FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
January 16 2000
6,456 Views

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

Dangers of Canola Oil

 

Although canola oil is not a favorite oil with me for a number of reasons (none of which were listed in the article), the statement suggesting that because it is used as an industrial oil it is therefore not edible is not valid. Flax oil is also used as an industrial oil for paint and linoleum, etc. But when it is prepared as a food it is edible. Most oils have been used at one time or another as industrial products. In my opinion, one of the most edible oils is coconut oil, which is used for many industrial products, especially for soaps and cosmetics.

Olive oil apparently has been used to make soap for as long as it has been used as a food oil. Perhaps the most blatant error and comparison made by Mr. Lynn, though, is that regarding canola oil and mustard gas, which chemically has absolutely no relationship to mustard oil or any other mustard plant. Mustard gas is 2,2'-dichlorodiethyl sulfide and its preparation using ethylene and sulfur chloride is given in the Merck Index. It received its name because of the yellowish color of the gas and the sulfur odor.

Canola and regular rapeseed oils are extracted from the seeds of several of the brassica plants - the same family of plants from which we get vegetables such as Brussels sprouts, broccoli, cabbage, kale, mustard greens, and several other vegetables.

Of course, there is not much fat in these vegetables; but what fat there is in some of them, e.g., mustard greens, is as much as 29 percent erucic acid. Also, since glycosides (typical are stevioside and other flavonoids) are basically water soluble, I would not expect to find much of them in any oil. Those glucosinolates found in rapeseed meal after the oil has removed from the seeds are the same goiterogens that are found in the brassica vegetables. One problem with canola oil is that it has to be partially hydrogenated or refined before it is used commercially and consequently is a source of trans fatty acids; sometimes at very high levels.

Another problem is that it is too unsaturated to be used exclusively in the diet; some of the undesirable effects caused by feeding canola can be rectified if the diet is made higher in saturated fatty acids.

Mary G. Enig, Ph.D., Director Nutritional Sciences Division Enig Associates, Inc.

marye@enig.com FAX:(301)680-8100

DR MERCOLA'S



Dr. MercolaDr. Mercola's Comments:

What a great honor to have Dr. Enig respond to the article last week on canola oil. Dr. Enig is a professor of biochemistry at the University of Maryland who is one of the top biochemists in the country. She is the main scientist in this country who has brought the dangers of trans fat to the public attention. Her web site on trans fat is phenomenal.

Sally Fallon, the author of Nourishing Traditions, has agreed to provide this newsletter with a definitive update on soy which she is writing and should be available in the next month. It will be about 10,000 words, so please keep posted as it should be excellent.

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 3 )
Comment on this Article
  
  
chuckandro
[ Joined on 04/07 ] [ Posted on August 14, 2008 ]
       
   
 
Novice User

Would very much like to know if canola oil is good for my family or not.  After I found that it was a good source of omega 3, I purchased it unrefined, bulk from the local co-op.  I thought that I had found the perfect duo of fats--olive oil for salad dressings, etc. and canola for salads plus sauteing, etc.  (A long time ago I had heard that canola was bad for our livers--but now thought that my find at the co-op and omega 3 info was the truth.  PLEASE advise me!

Thank you,

Roberta

 [ Reply ]
  
  
C Ed Wright
[ Joined on 06/07 ] [ Posted on July 21, 2008 ]
       
   
 
Savvy User

Ultimately, the titles leave us wondering what "Dangers of Canola Oil" we should "Beware" of.

 [ Reply ]
  
  
C Ed Wright
[ Joined on 06/07 ] [ Posted on July 21, 2008 ]
       
   
 
Savvy User

This article comes across as a little confusing because it apparently refutes a number of misstatements in another article by a Mr. Lynn that are not reiterated here, and so the points of refutation seem to jump around without much development or connection.  In the end, it raises more questions than it answers so very incompletely.  The only real point that comes across clearly & completely is that Mr. Lynn obviously doesn't know what he's talking about, especially if he thinks mustard gas comes from mustard; the intellectual inverse equivalent of thinking baby blue is the color of babies.

 [ Reply ]

 
Truste
 
Mercola