|
Low-energy acoustic "shock-wave
therapy" appears to be an effective treatment for heel pain due to
chronic plantar fasciitis and may help patients avoid surgery.
The use of such therapy for
musculoskeletal disorders is controversial, lead author and colleagues
note. However, there have been some reports suggesting that it could be
beneficial for patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.
Plantar fasciitis is heel pain
that is usually worse first thing in the morning or after a period of
inactivity; it is also often worse when walking bare foot. The pain is
due to inflammation of the plantar fascia, a band of tissue that supports
the bottom of the foot during walking.
As
many as 6 million people may suffer from plantar fasciitis.
The investigators looked at
97 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis who were treated with one of
two shock-wave regimens. All the patients had tried a number of different
treatments with little success, including anti-inflammatory drugs, shock-absorbing
shoe inserts, stretching exercises, night splints, casts, corticosteroid
injections, physical therapy, icing, ultrasound and radiation therapy.
Patients in group I received
three applications of 1,000 impulses of low-energy shock waves, while
those in group II received three applications of 10 impulses. Because
the shock waves are considered to be low-energy, anesthesia is unnecessary,
although the treatment is unpleasant.
The US Food and Drug Administration has approved a device that
delivers high-energy acoustic shock waves for treating plantar fasciitis,
but anesthesia is necessary for the treatment.
At 6 months, those in group
I had better function and less pain than those in group II. Five years
later, the differences were less pronounced, but outcomes were still better
in group I.
The researchers say the difference
is due to the fact that many patients in group II had, by that time, undergone
surgery that led to major improvements.
At 5 years, fewer patients
in group I (13%) had undergone surgery than patients in group II (58%).
Journal
of Bone and Joint Surgery 2002;84-A:335-341
|