FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
April 21 2004
1,695 Views

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

Low Doses of Radiation Might Actually be Good for You

 
Citizens of Sacramento had the city close down its nuclear power plant for fear of what the radiation might do. Instead, the district put up windmills, on which a windy day are capable of producing 1 percent of what the power plant did. In addition to the windmill, a photovoltaic solar plant was built, which has generated one-third of 1 percent of that power.

Since 1990, eight nuclear power plants have been shut down in the United States, none ordered after 1974 were finished and orders to build another power plant hasn’t happened since 1978. However, the 103 remaining nuclear reactors in the United States produce 7.6 percent of the nation’s energy, as electricity.

Presently there are 442 nuclear power plants in existence worldwide, with 35 under construction and 24 of them in Asia.

Beliefs that resulted in fears of radiation:

  • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determined that any amount of exposure to ionizing radiation was harmful. The EPA set very strict regulatory limits for public exposure to radiation at 15 and 100 mrem (millirem) a year, which is the level radioactive sites must achieve before they can be released to the public.

  • People have developed "radiophobia," the fear of any level of ionizing radiation, due to the news media and deeply-manifested devastation over the loss of lives caused by the atomic bombs that were dropped during World War II.

  • Another belief, which seems to be the most correctable, is the belief that radiation dose and its biological effects are believed to conform to the "Linear model," which predicts the number of cancer deaths assumed to be caused by low doses of radiation.

On the contrary, other experts stated that low doses of ionizing radiation do not cause cancer and could have a beneficial effect on a person’s health. Studies have shown that low to moderate doses of radiation have decreased the risks of cancer, however government agencies and the media chose to ignore this data.

Each year Americans are exposed to an average 200 mrem of natural and medical radiation. Natural radiation comes from uranium found in the bricks and plaster from buildings. Radioactive potassium, a naturally occurring radioactive isotope of potassium, produces about 25 mrem of radiation per year, which exceeds the EPA safety limit.

Significant findings that challenge earlier beliefs on the dangers caused by radiation:

  • A study of people living in Ramsar, Iran, who are exposed to natural radiation levels of 79,000 mrem per year, have not shown increased cases of cancer. Since the radiation levels exceed the EPA’s radiation safety standard allotment by 5,266 mrem, this study contradicts the "linear hypothesis."

  • Experts found that radiation in small doses has had protective effects on cellular function by stimulating the immune system defenses, which prevents oxidative DNA damage and suppresses cancer.

  • Another study revealed that the survivors in Nagasaki, who received 1,000 to 19,000 mrem of radiation, had lower cases of cancer and are living longer than the non-irradiated population.

  • The radiation hormesis model explained why residents living in high-radon-level areas such as Japan, Germany and central Europe have shown decreased cases of cancer.

It is important that the people of Sacramento understand that low to moderate doses of radiation are not harmful and evidence has proven that radiation at these levels can actually be beneficial to one’s health. Also, experts stated that people who are afraid of nuclear power plants could set their fears aside, because nuclear power has been reported to be the cleanest and safest form of energy on the planet for generating electricity.

Lew Rockwell April 2, 2004

Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Spring, 2004;9(1) (PDF File)



Dr. Mercola Dr. Mercola's Comments:

The two above articles expand on the concept of how exposure to small amounts of ionizing radiation may actually increase longevity. I don't have the technical expertise to carefully analyze these arguments one way or the other, but I know enough about health that it seems to be a reasonable hypothesis based on similar beneficial items.

Most of you know that I have long been opposed to radiation exposure and I have posted articles by Dr. Gofman who is a nuclear physicist and medical doctor on how exposure to X-rays may increase cancer and heart disease. However, we all, me included, need to be open to the possibility that some of our foundational understandings of how the body works may be seriously flawed. It appears that exposure to X-ray radiation may be one of them.

It is a well-accepted fact that excessive exposure to radiation is deadly and needs to be avoided.

If we examine another well-known beneficial factor for human health, exercise, we may have some helpful comparisons. It is certainly possible to over-exercise to a point that it is fatal to nearly 100 percent of humans. However, at smaller doses it becomes a highly beneficial and essential part of health.

Exercise is a stress that helps our body adjust and actually become healthier.

Most of us are not aware that Americans are exposed to an average 200 mrem of natural and medical radiation per year. Natural background radiation comes from cosmic rays, isotopes of uranium and thorium in the bricks, plaster, and concrete of buildings, and radioactive potassium.

Radioactive potassium in our bodies generates about 25 mrem of radiation per year--more than the EPA safety limit. In my view it is not such a great leap of faith to believe that exposure to something naturally in our environment may actually be beneficial.

I don't know about you, but this perspective sure makes me feel better about getting my teeth X-rayed.

Related Articles:

Preventing Pathogenic Food Poisoning: Sanitation Not Irradiation

Many in the Scientific Community Are Opposed to Irradiation

Reconsider Having Screening Full-Body CT Scans

Hands-Free Mobile Phones May Increase Radiation Exposure

Radiation For Breast Cancer May Not Extend Life

Vitamin D for Cancer

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 0 )
Comment on this Article

 
Truste
 
Mercola