By
Brian Shilhavy
First
published in the coconut-info
discussion group
There is a war brewing in U.S. nutrition. While stalwarts such
as Mary Enig, Sally Fallon, Bruce Fife and others have been in the
trenches fighting this war for years now with little publicity,
Gary Taubes entered the battle in July 2002 with his article What
if it's All Been a Big Fat Lie? This was published in the New
York Times, and later Time Magazine ran it as their cover story.
In this article Gary Taubes easily showed everyone that low-fat
diets don't work: they don't lead to weight loss, and they don't
prevent heart disease. The scientific literature on this point is
overwhelming. Why the media picked up Taubes' message when others
have been saying the same thing for years is not clear to me, but
Gary Taubes made Dr. Atkins and the low-carb diets overnight successes.
Taubes and Atkins were viciously attacked by the Diet Dictocrats
(to borrow a term I believe was coined by Sally Fallon), but it
didn't matter. In general, low-fat diets don't work, and low-carb
diets do, and people could easily figure this out for themselves,
at least in terms of weight loss.
But some people just don't get it, and low-fat diet proponents
aren't going away just yet. The media continues to promote low-fat
and anti-saturated fat thinking. On Google you can sign up for media
alerts on certain search terms, and I have one set for "coconut
oil," which brings me daily e-mail from Google of all stories
published on the Internet each day using the term "coconut
oil." Other than just simple recipes that might use coconut
along with some "oil" that come up, the majority of stories
I browse through each day are condemning trans fatty acids and lumping
them together with saturated fats, including "coconut oil."
What one group is the most responsible for getting this anti-saturated
fats and anti-coconut oil message out to the media? Without a doubt
it is CSPI (the Center for Science in the Public Interest). CSPI
is the most responsible for turning the public against tropical
oils and getting coconut oil removed from the U.S. food industry.
They are a multi-million-dollar "non-profit" group that
claims to know more about nutrition than the public. Their mission
in life is to protect you from the dangers of fats. And, unfortunately,
the wording they publish on their own "nutritional expertise"
often is drafted for bills in Congress--such is their influence.
Fortunately, in my Google alerts recently I did find one positive
article in the media by a minority voice calling CSPI to task. (Note:
Dr.
Mary Enig has been calling CSPI to task for many years). This
article was written and published today by Sandy Szwarc, an
editor at Better Homes and Gardens.
Sandy alerts us to a study published by CSPI of chain restaurants
that claimed kids' menus offered few healthful choices and that
without labeling parents were unaware that what they were ordering
was high in calories, bad fats and salt. It coincided with Sen.
Tom Harkin's (D-Iowa) introduction of a bill requiring point-of-purchase
labels for calories, fat and salt at all chain restaurants. This
"study" was carried by every major newspaper and TV network
in America in early March 2004, showing just how much influence
CSPI has over the media.
But Sandy, unlike many others in the media, did not just accept
CSPIs claims at face value. She has apparently done her homework
on CSPI, as she states:
"CSPI's study was an egregious example that anything can
be called a "study" nowadays. It wasn't a clinical trial
that proved restaurant meals cause childhood obesity or have anything
to do with it--there's no evidence of that. It wasn't published
in a peer-reviewed journal, but in a CSPI fund-raiser, their Nutrition
Action Healthletter. Most appalling, their sampling wasn't impartial
or representative of restaurant meals; nor were their evaluation
criteria based on sound nutrition."
Sandy goes on to show many of the flaws in CSPI's "research,"
including their historic anti-fat
campaigns against coconut oil.
The most alarming information in this article is the fact that
CSPI is considered the authority on nutrition to many politicians,
and certain bills are now before Congress that would force nutritional
labeling for restaurants, AND also require their nutritional advice
to be published to
the American public.
So please be informed about this. The Diet Dictocrats are starting
to lose the battle in the free enterprise market place, where folks
like you are making informed decisions about your dietary choices
(and becoming healthier and slimmer as a result!) So the only course
left to them is in the political arena, by trying to legislate what
it is proper nutrition for you and your children, and by bringing
pressure against the food industry when they don't conform to their
standards.
So the war rages on. The question now is when is the media going
to wake up and give equal time to the other side? Publishing Gary
Taubes article was a step in the right direction, and articles like
this one from Sandy Szwarc give us some hope.
As I said, most of the articles I get on coconut oil each day by
Google are negative, and promote
the CSPI dogma of lumping saturated fats and coconut oil together
with trans fatty acids. Be educated yourself on these issues by
reviewing the research.
|