Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

coraljc — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:14:03 GMT

Read Light's Out by TS Wiley and Dr Bent Formby, and Sex, Lies and Menopause by TS Wiley, Dr Julie Taguchi and Dr Bent Formby.

The information is priceless, esp where it pertains to the physiological contributing factors to breast cancer, diabetes, heart disease etc.

Bio-mimetic hormone replacement therapy is not even in the same category with Premarin and Prempro found to induce cancer.

There is some controversy about TS Wiley's credentials, but her knowledge is astounding as a medical researcher. As a 59 year old breast cancer

survivor, I have become a very educated person where it comes to nutritional, sleep patterns and emotional components of this too-common imbalance.

I've found that after only 3 months of being on the Wiley protocols, my energy level has dramatically increased, I sleep better, I've lost excess weight EASILY

since the cravings for sugar and carbs have abated. My bloodwork clearly demonstrates that my calcium is now staying IN my bones,

rather than losing it daily, which has contributed to advanced osteoporosis. I feel stronger and healthier everyday now. Better than in 15 years!

Do the reading on the research of generous, REAL healing-motivated doctors like Dr Mercola. They are the real deal, and not the pill-pushers in the pockets of big

pharmaceutical companies who actually SUPPRESS the truth for profit. Western medicine is great for emergencies, but often their "cures" lead to far worse imbalances

in brain/body chemistry. Massage, 8-9 hours a night of sleep, regular relaxation, meditation and gentle but consistent exercise (walking is best!) can offer a return

to a state of well-being in a way that no synthetic drugs can. Getting back in sync with the natural lunar cycle for women, is the best way to prevent and heal

from the artificial conditions we impose on our bodies. Emotional balance, self-care and a refusal to collude in our own unhappiness are tickets to a better quality of life!

Thanks Dr Mercola, for your great work!

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

Anvanya — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:08:47 GMT

I can personally testify to the efficacy of the German New Medicine. After a diagnosis of breast cancer in August of 2007, I had a lumpectomy and a lymph node removal. However, when I had my very first chempotherapy infusion, it nearly killed me. Luckily, I have learned to listen to my body, and I then refused any more treatments. Instead I began GNM sessions and have been able to let go of an entire complex of conflicts which contributed to the developement of the cancer and several other medical conditions, notably asthma. Incidentally, the oncological radiation doctor informed me after she had read my file that "It is as if you never had any cancer at all, because of the results of the two surgeries and path lab reports." This was BEFORE I had my first GNM session. YET - the oncologist wanted me to continue with poisonous chemotherapy treatments!

I cannot say enough good about GNM and the practitioner who helps me. Would that I were able to convince others in my family to try it for their serious medical conditions.

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

Midas1 — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:45:14 GMT

Follow the money and you'll always find the answer. Big Pharma's average cost for one chemo treatment is $7,000. Up to one-half is kicked back from the drug company to your doctor. Chemo is nothing more than the most barbaric, putrid "treatment" in existence. Chemo kills more people than it helps. What makes sense about destroying the immune system? Nothing. In fact, we're still using the same crappy chemo agents such as adriamycin that we used in the 1970s. Are we to believe we have nothing better in all these years? Once people stop consider their doctor to be God is the time when we might see change. I would never undergo chemotherapy because it is a sure way to die. I also don't want the too-often resulting renal failure, hearing loss, cardiac damage, etc., etc., etc.,.... An epidemic of good health is the last thing Big Pharma wants. Cancer pays!! Oncology is one of the biggest profit centers for most hospitals.

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

Sophielou — Fri, 04 Jan 2008 03:54:07 GMT

I was diagnosed on 12-21-88 w/breast cancer (after 2 negative mammograms) and went thru lumpectomy and then mastectomy. there was node involvement. Had 12 chemo treatments over 7 months and 19 years later I'm still here. Mother had double mastectomy and colo/rectal cancer. Hereditary factor. I was 51 yrs old and not over weight when diagnosed and ate well. At the time I did smoke.

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

muttonmom — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:34:52 GMT

I know the pressure that the Dr. can try. I was diagnosed with Breast Cancer in July of 07. And before I knew what was happening they had me set up for surgery, chemo and GOD knows what else. I done some research and found some herbs on the net and bought them. Then I found a natural Dr. and have been doing acupuncture and nutrition therapy. The tumor was rather large and is now over half gone. I feel better than I have in years with this program.

You can survive in spite of the main stream Dr.

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

aziegler_203 — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 02:02:01 GMT

Read Louise Hay's You Can Heal Your Life! It's fantastic. www.hayhouse.com.

It's all about healing yourself with your thoughts. Must read for anyone who is ill, or even who isn't and wants to stay healthy.

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

StephanieThomas — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 01:26:17 GMT

I agree I have never know anyone with cancer that has had standard treatment live very long. My sisters mother in-law was given 3-6 months to live and decided not to do anything. Well it is three months later and she is still very heathly and mri showed no growth in her tumor pancreatic. I feel to each his own. If it works for you go ahead. But I have not had any good experiences with testing. Try to find your own way. Good luck

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

Riki — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:16:05 GMT

I just lost a niece to cancer. She was only 20, and pregnant. She was a happy, sweet, beautiful girl, engaged to be married to her sweetheart of 6 years. Her website talks of how excited she is and her fiance talks of how happy he is to be marrying Nancy and spending the rest of his life with her. :(

She was about 16-20 weeks pregnant and feeling VERY sick. She went to a walk-in clinic (Primary Health) and they told her nothing was wrong with her.

Her fiance finally took her to a major hospital emergency room because she was so weak. They figured out she had non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. Her WBC's were 400,000.

They convinced her that her only chance of survival was to induce labor. Her tiny baby girl lived for 25 minutes in her arms before dying.

They drugged her up so she would relax and conserve energy for healing, then pumped her full of chemo/radiation. She never woke up again. Her organs failed, she couldn't breathe on her own, she was on life support. The doctors convinced her family that she wasn't going to make it and they should just "pull the plug".

How can a young vibrant girl walk into an emergency room, get a diagnosis of cancer, and be gone in three weeks????????????? It's devastating.

I hope to get comments on this, the whole family is devastated, as is her fiance and her friends.

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

TXlady — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:39:07 GMT

Hi, this is my very first post. Let me start by wishing all of you a healthy and prosperous 2008! My question is about metabolic typing. I read the book, and attempted the self test questions. I'm frustrated because I can't answer the questions regarding red meat and how I feel if I eat this at breakfast, or in the evening etc. I haven't touched red meat in any form for over 20 years, I just don't like it. My question is: how do I find out what my nutrional type is if I can't answer those questions?

Thanks in advance for any help/advice you can give me,

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

jbell — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:05:20 GMT

Anyone who cares at all about any of the reproductive cancers that are rampant these days, should read the works of Dr. John Lee, M.D., whether they are a patient or pracitioner or both. These readily available works include the best explanaitons I have ever read or heard, as well as the best protocols for recovering to good health. In fact, I thik these approaches are so effective that I bet my own life on them. When I was diagnosed nearly 3 years ago with prostate cancer at a little over 54 years of age, I followed Dr. Lee's protocols rather than the conventional route that the good folks at Kaiser were pushing very hard. A few months later I was "miraculously" free of disease. My closed-minded, ignorant urologist was amazed, but not enough to even read Dr. Lee's work, even though I bought him his very own copy. Talk about brain-washed by the "system"! Folks, as long as big pharma controls the "standards of care", and even a good part of the curriculum of required continuing education for health care practitioners, we cannot trust the medical establishment to be the guardians of our health. That is why we must all become our own experts about our own health, and just use physicians when we must as our servents and the mostly dumb technicians they often turn out to be. We also need to work to overturn the legal and economic forces that are certain to increasingly seek to disempower us when it comes to our own health.

Here's a pretty good website for getting started with familiarizing yourself with Dr. Lee's highly effective work.

http://www.johnleemd.com/

I have helped lots and lots of women with breast and other reproductive cancers towards recovering their health by getting them going on this learning. I wish I could get all doctors who have anything to do with this to at least look at this body of knowledge.

Also, for general health education that really makes sense, check this out:

www.yourownhealthandfitness.org

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

BerrySongbird — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 05:43:58 GMT

This is fascinating, take a look at Henry Wright's book "A More Excellent Way", he also confirms that our emotions have tremendous consequences on our health. It's a great read. I highly recommend it.

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

DizzyIzzy1 — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:22:51 GMT

Anyone else wonder about the amount of aluminium in your average deodorant?

I don't see that it helps, and to be honest, there are alternatives that work far better anyway. I switched to using rock crystal (ammonium alum) deodorant a few months ago and it works far better than any of my old, standard-issue aluminium ones anyway!! Plus it's lasting forever, I think one of them will probably see me through the rest of this year.

If there's an alternative and it works, why bother with something that's got the potential to do harm?

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

mama bear — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 21:45:35 GMT

I wouldn't consider chemo if I had a cancer diagnosis. I have seen too many people go straight to their death with chemo. However, that is their choice. Just don't force "conventional" medicine upon me.

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

go getter — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:04:12 GMT

Your newsletter is the best source of health on the planet,and I have used EFT successfully on myself and introduced it to many of my clients.

I follow all your advice in many of my health issues with great success. You have gone back and revised things that you have said, (as new informatiom is researched )and that to me is a person who lives from integrity. Many thanks and a fruitful New Year! June

re: Does Chemo for Breast Cancer Cause More Harm Than Good?

fearz — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:28:12 GMT

Cancer was not a health issue 100 years ago and has gradually become a significant risk. I find it hard to believe that their is more unresolved conflict now than in the past. But their has been unquestionably more chemicals, processed foods, and GMO's in our lives during the past 100 years.