The ''Experts'' Are Wrong About Raw Milk

re: The ''Experts'' Are Wrong About Raw Milk

laurzeburg — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:21:52 GMT

I hope this isn't a stupid question but since many people say there's harmful bacteria in raw milk that can effect the immune system does that mean it could be harmful to the calves that drink it also? Idk i dont really no alot about cows =]

re: The ''Experts'' Are Wrong About Raw Milk

cellhealth — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 15:57:19 GMT

I must be missing something! Audrey's comment above that the cows producing the raw milk only produce what they normally do in one year - Audrey, like so many other people seem to forget why a cow produces milk in the first place - it is clearly not for the sake of keeping humans happy - it is for their own young, which generally have been removed, just so you strange humans can drink the bodily fluid of an animal. Each cow has to be pregnant - go through the 9 nine months of carrying their calf - have the calf taken away - so that you strange humans can steal the milk destined for their calf. All mammals in the world allow their young to access the mother's milk - there is only one mammal in the world that continues to drink milk beyond the weaning stage and that is the allegedly intelligent mammal - humans, who continue drinking the bodily fluid of an animal for ever – no one queries why so many people have allergies or intolerances to milk – how about it’s not a natural food for humans – can that be so difficult to understand – the research involving milk consumption and how it is detrimental to our health is enormous – go to www.notmilk.com – and see for yourself.

Annalyn's plight is clearly serious, in having the twins taken away, however she does state, that one of the main reasons they were taken away was the consumption of raw millk, so I guess there were other reasons! So do the twins a favour and stop them drinking milk altogether. Sorry to be so blunt but the evidence concerning milk is overwhelming. Enjoy the site.

re: The ''Experts'' Are Wrong About Raw Milk

Annalyn — Tue, 12 May 2009 01:42:30 GMT

We have twins who have been on the Weston A. Price raw milk formula for several months. They have done very well on it. But they have been taken away from us, and one of the main reasons cited by the doctors is the raw milk. We need somebody to testify at trial about the benefits of raw milk. Can you recommend someone?

re: The ''Experts'' Are Wrong About Raw Milk

jack6 — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 17:16:26 GMT

I have been drinking raw misk since December of last year. I no longer have phlem after drinking it. And boy does it taste good.

re: The ''Experts'' Are Wrong About Raw Milk

Audrey Bradbury — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:28:15 GMT

I am sure you are aware of Michael Schmidt's Glencolton Farm, in Durham, Ontario, which was raided in November 2006, and Michael's court case which comes up in May 2008. I am one of his milk share members, and was involved in picking up the dairy products from his farm for local Milk Share members in the Barrie, Ontario, area.

We definitely need all the backing we can get to allow raw milk from regulated farms to be sold in Ontario - so many of us depend on it. Michael's biodynamic farm is efficiently run and spotlessly clean, and the animals are gentle and treated as friends, and grass fed of course. They are not forced to produce more milk than is normal for a cow to produce in a year.

It is very appropriate that this article is in your newsletter now, and I hope to see more of them. Any help you can give us would be very much appreciated.

No thinking person, who is aware that their very existence depends of the quality of the food they consume, would want to drink the pasteurised homogenized milk sold in the grocery stores, coming from ill treated and improperly fed cows raised on factory farms.