<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://articles.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Diet, Not Fillings, is Your Major Source of Mercury Risk</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/04/09/diet-mercury.aspx</link><description>One in 12 U.S. women of childbearing age have potentially hazardous levels of mercury in their blood as a result of consuming fish, according to government scientists. The findings support previous recommendations that pregnant women limit their dietary</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Diet, Not Fillings, is Your Major Source of Mercury Ris</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/04/09/diet-mercury.aspx#37158</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:09:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:37158</guid><dc:creator>not_worried</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not so quick to condemn amalgam fillings. At least not until the alternatives are far better than they are now. I have had to replace three composite fillings already, all in under five years. The silver fillings they replaced lasted 30+ years. &amp;nbsp;As the composite fillings go bad, I am having them re-replaced with amalgam.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://articles.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=37158" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>