http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/02/19/ultrasound-scans.aspxBy Dr. Sarah Buckley E-mail: sarahjbuckley@uqconnect.net When I was pregnant with my first baby in 1990, I decided against having a scan. This was a rather unusual decision as my partner and I are both doctors and had even done pregnancy scans ourselvesenCommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/02/19/ultrasound-scans.aspx#37369Tue, 27 May 2008 18:24:13 GMT24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:37369rwhenny69<p>I guess no one cares anymore about finding out if there baby is alive before they have it?</p> <p>I guess you dont care that the placenta might be covering the opening to the cervix and cause the </p> <p>death of the mother and fetus during birth?</p> <p>I guess you dont care about anything other than your way of thinking? </p> <p>Don't you think honestly if ultrasound was harmful( which it is not when the proper equipment and </p> <p>educated technologist or physician perform the exam) if they were harmful they would still be performing them 30 years later.</p> <p>I think it would be wise for you to research this topic again and not publish such misleading information.</p> <img src="http://articles.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=37369" width="1" height="1">