<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://articles.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Eggs Not a Likely Source of Salmonella Contamination</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/02/05/eggs-salmonella-part-two.aspx</link><description>Is salmonella really a significant threat when eating eggs raw? To understand either side of the issue, it’s helpful to first understand the infection. Salmonella, discovered in 1887 by American veterinarian Daniel Elmer Salmon, is a large genus of bacteria</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>