<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://articles.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Top Blood Pressure Number Key For Gauging Heart Disease Risk</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2002/03/30/blood-pressure-part-eight.aspx</link><description>The top number in a blood pressure reading is the best way to determine a man's heart attack and stroke risk, and should be used to guide treatment. But many doctors continue to treat patients based on the lower number, and the study authors believe this</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Top Blood Pressure Number Key For Gauging Heart Disease Risk</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2002/03/30/blood-pressure-part-eight.aspx#38333</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:08:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:38333</guid><dc:creator>cathyoberg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am having trouble finding standards for Low Blood Pressure for those who are taking several medications for high blood pressure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dizziness and fatigue seem to be a problem when diastolic pressure is between 52-64 in my husband. Some doctors say it can't be too low, but it seems dangerous to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://articles.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=38333" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>