<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://articles.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Scientists Find Fluoridation Outdated &amp; Question Its</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/12/22/fluoridation-part-two.aspx</link><description>Fluoridation may be immoral with benefits exaggerated and risks minimized. Ethically, it cannot be argued that past benefits, by themselves, justify continuing the practice of fluoridation. Fluoridation is a scientific controversy and substantial benefits</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>