<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://articles.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Artificial Light: Plain Common Sense Vs. Scientific Theoretical Irrationality</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/07/11/artificial-light.aspx</link><description>Part 1 of 3 ( Part 2 , Part 3 ) By John Ott The trend in today's modern architecture is, to say the least, confusing. Does it really make any difference what kind of artificial lighting is used? More and more buildings are now either constructed with</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>