<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://articles.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Something Rotten at the Core of Science?</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/02/28/scientific-research-part-one.aspx</link><description>by David F. Horrobin BioMedNet A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision and an analysis of the peer review system substantiate complaints about this fundamental aspect of scientific research. Far from filtering out junk science, peer review may be blocking</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: Something Rotten at the Core of Science?</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/02/28/scientific-research-part-one.aspx#39645</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:55:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:39645</guid><dc:creator>Outlook</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I really couldn't understand the content. I think I understood the flavor.....but I'm not a scientist nor a politition. I wanted to understand and maybe I got the message: most public messages and reports are a cover up.???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://articles.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=39645" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>