<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://articles.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>The USDA Thinks That Disease-Ridden Meat is OK to Eat</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2000/07/23/diseased-meat.aspx</link><description>The USDA is imposing new rules reclassifying as &amp;quot;safe for human consumption&amp;quot; animal carcasses with cancers, tumors and open sores. Federal meat inspectors and consumer groups are protesting the move to classify tumors and open sores as aesthetic</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>re: The USDA Thinks That Disease-Ridden Meat is OK to Eat</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2000/07/23/diseased-meat.aspx#40290</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:13:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">24451277-a5aa-4add-96dc-64081bfd86fa:40290</guid><dc:creator>antbwill</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;good, informative article&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://articles.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=40290" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>