<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://articles.mercola.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>More Faulty Reasoning In the Debate Over the Bible Diet</title><link>http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/03/21/bible-diet.aspx</link><description>By Bill Sardi The debate over the "Bible diet," appearing at www.mercola.com, needs an addendum. It certainly requires rebuttal since it's obvious conclusion is that "God had a bad idea there." The Book of Genesis did originally prescribe a plant food</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator></channel></rss>