Off Target in the War on Cancer

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

pfarley — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:24:42 GMT

The article was very interesting and informative, but I think you forgot one very important step to fighting cancer. That step I think is the most important step, that of PRAYER !!! God is the source of all healing.

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

Patrick McGean — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:11:13 GMT

Cancer is the War within our cells.

Aquaverde, 9 Sept 08, mentioned Dr Otto Warburg and his proof that cancer is a result cellular metabolism without intracellular oxygen, anaerobic cellular biology. We, the Live Blood and Cellular Matrix Study believe that the acidosis or intracellular fermentation is a result of the lack of integrity or flexibility of the cell membrane.

We believe that this is a result of a sulfur deficiency resulting from the use of chemical fertilizers in Germany, 50 to 70 years before the same deficiency was experienced in the rest of Europe. The US did not adopt these chemical plant foods until 1954.

Germany began using coal tar based chemical fertilizers in 1860, the rest of Europe did

not beginning using these fertilizers until after they were developed by Farbin I.G. in

1938 from crude oil. We believe that this use of coal tar based chemical fertilizers is

why Dr Otto Warburg saw more patients with cancer compared to his contemporaries.

It could be the same reason why Dr. Alzheimer saw more women “lost in their own minds” long before the same symptoms were described anywhere else. Chemical fertilizers are cracked at 380 F., sulfur vaporizes at 271 F. There is no bio available

Sulfur in ammonium sulfate or nitrate.

Cellular biology is often overlooked when we consider Lung Cancer, or Breast Cancer

or any cancer which is described by the effected organs or systems. Every case of

Cancer begins with one cell which undergoes anaerobic cellular metabolism and continues with the same fermentation using the trapped carbon dioxide over and over again. Until tumors arise or the cells are metastasized into a surrounding or a distant matrix of cells the process is just as simple as described by Dr. Warburg’s Noble proof.

Using the above time line and the available numbers of epidemiology cancer has increased many times faster than the population rates since these chemical fertilizers have become the economic rule of industrialized nations. The cancer rates of cultures which still employ organic farming practices are considerably less than those of the industrialized nations.

We agree with all 12 of the suggestions proposed by D. Mercola and believe that if these

are examined from a cellular biological perspective each and everyone can be related to

the health of the cell membrane. Cells without a cell membrane are like humans without

skin. Every cell within the body human has a cell membrane. The cell membrane is

the protector, the gate keeper for nutrition and the gases for cellular metabolism. When

the cell membrane looses its pliability and becomes aplastic fluid osmosis can still occur

but the transport of oxygen, the giant gas molecule may be inhibited, and the revolving door for carbon dioxide elimination is inhibited or stopped completely. No oxygen in, no carbon dioxide out.

Our Study has been investigating the return of sulfur to the diets of our Study members

Since 1999. We have no reports of miracle cures for cancer, but nor have any of our Study members reported a new diagnosis of cancer or a higher stage levels of their existing diagnosed cancer. Those who were already diagnosed with some form of cancer are still with the Study save for two women with stage four lymphoma. Cellular biology has a difficult battle when it comes to any stage four disease process. In both cases of invasive lymphoma the only pain relief was achieved with Organic Sulfur and the abandonment of narcotics for pain relief.

Our Study members who were confronted with chemotherapy either for a first time or as a follow up and took sulfur during their therapy suffered none of the common side effects of chemotherapy. Their cancer cell counts decreased but at the same time their white blood counts remained normal or above normal. Chemotherapy is designed to kill cells, often healthy cells to stem the tide of the cancer. Infections were also not reported in any of our Study members.

We can not supply the type of “proof” that Otto Warburg did in his Noble Prize work.

But nowhere in his proof did he site the cause for this increase in anaerobic cellular metabolism. Linus Pauling also a Noble Prize recipient stated often that if we look very

closely we will find a mineral deficiency as the cause of our modern diseases.

We are what we eat, breathe and come in contact during our journey though life. As

Dr. Mercola cites how we perceive our health i.e. our psychology of our health is just

as important, worry and you become more acidic, you sleep less, your body becomes

incapable of processing the foods we need for cellular energy. Prevention is the best

method to address any disease especially cancer. How we spend our money for the food

we eat is how we change the battlefield of cancer. I would point to Dr. Mercola’s first

point of reducing processed food. Preservatives are a major part of the additives found in processed food and they prevent normal cellular biology to avoid spoilage on the shelves. How do these preservatives effect our cellular biology? Just ask a mortician why less embalming fluid is require to embalm our older generation with their already preserved skin.

The Live Blood and Cellular Matrix Study is ongoing and we are accepting new Study

Members including those who may be concerned they are predisposed for cancer.

Our Study began with a concern that cancers which do not respond to conventional cut,

burn or poison therapies may respond to aerobic cellular biology aided by returning

sulfur to one’s diet. Healthy aerobic cellular biology may be the key to prevention of cancer and many of our modern disease concerns.

Patrick McGean

Study Director

organicsulfur@sisna.com

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

davidcmcm — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:30:33 GMT

I was following GNM closely, receiving regular posts and reading them avidly. I received a request for funds to help with research. I sent some money and since then have never had another bit of contact from them. How should I read this, I think I was a little misled. David

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

lcraig — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:58:27 GMT

Read "The China Study" by Dr Campbell. The article is right in all the other things that can cause cancer, but the basic reason we catch cancer and all the other deseases we die from in our diet. We are the richest nation in the world and the sickess. We can afford to eat what ever we want. Basically we eat to much meat. Animal protein is stronger that our bodies can handle and the problem builds up over your life time. I have reversed my prostate cancer by reducing animal meat by a large quantity. I eat only organic, I don't care what the cost, and have added a lot more vegetable to my diet. There have been many studies and books written on the subject, but some how never get read by the public. No one wants to give up meat. My strength and edurance is as good as its ever been, my skin is much healthier since this change, open sores have completly dissapeared. By changing our diets we can reduce the cause of cancer by more than half. Read the book even if you don not want give up your prescious meat.

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

go getter — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:52:04 GMT

I'm on board with the many that say that if the body is alkaline cancer can not grow . This does take a fair amount of effort on one's part but it is worth it . It gives you peace of mind knowing that you can not get cancer if you are alkaline. There are many cures for cancer that have been suppressed by Big Pharma. No money if they can not patent as a drug. Just to list a few, Vitamin C intravenously, Vitamin B17 also know as laetrile ,and the biggest one is Hemp Oil (NOT from the seeds) but from a female plant when in the flowering stage,the active ingredient is THC. If curious go to a site at www.phoenixtears.ca

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

Leee-la — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:32:56 GMT

I am also an alkaline diet believer. I also believe we are getting cancer from the animals from factory farming. How can a person be healthy eating the cruelty, terror and pain of these animals. Leila

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

bolleber40 — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:29:15 GMT

There is one additional thought to consider, and that is when some people look at the list of lifestyle changes they must make, they will shrug and continue in their desctructive ways because it takes genuine effort to make those kinds of changes. Many won't want to give up their hamburgers, diet cokes, cholesterol pills, grudges against people, and all the other factors that are contributing to a cancer incubation vehicle. I tried to get my ex-husband to make a few small dietary changes so he would stop taking a pill everyday for acid reflux, but he preferred not to stop eating the things that caused the problem and wanted to continue with the 'easy' solution of popping a pill. You can lead them to the trough of wellness but you can't make them change their unhealthy ways.

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

ThomasT — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:05:35 GMT

And..if you have read all that, then go out and invest in The Prevention and Cure For All Cancers, 2007, H R Clark, PhD ND, and get up to date on the science. You will then confidently ignore any misinformation that uses the words treatment, and/or risk reduction. This work is based on the precise idendification of the active virii, bacteria, parasites, chemicals, metals, radioactive elements etc that cause cancer and their pathways taken. This was done by using her patented synchrometer, (a resonance comparison device). Interestingly, the authoress was threatened with imprisonment in the USA should she publish, but her lawyers won out on freedom of speech. This work is privately published as no Medical nor Scientific Journal would ever allow its publication, as that would dent/kill a mega-billion dollar industry. Have the courage to go outside the controllers, and save some lives, plus your own. And, by the way, it is an insuklt to a 40-years researcher/cell biologist, to call this junk science, as one chef has already done on these forums.

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

aquaverde — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:27:35 GMT

I learned about the health-promoting virtues of having alkaline body fluids through googling this subject, writing such entries as: "staying healthy with an alkaline diet", "preventing cancer with an alkaline diet", etc. There is a wealth of accessible information online for anyone wishing to become knowledgeable about this very affordable practice for helping to be in optimal health. I've learned that having an alkaline pH level not only prevents cancer, it also creates an environment in your body where harmful bacteria and a vast number of viruses cannot thrive.

When I began eating in such a way that my pH level is consistently slightly alkaline almost 3 years ago, I haven't been sick once nor have had any colds. I've learned that I can test my pH level through the use of litmus paper that I buy at Super Supplements for this purpose. I test my urine, since testing saliva isn't accurate unless it's done at least 2 hours after eating.

Many people believe that you have to practically be a vegetarian to maintain an alkaline pH level. This isn't true at all. I still incorporate acid producing foods into my diet such as meat, fish, dairy, a few carbs such as sprouted bread and potatoes, and even a cup of coffee in the morning. To make sure my body stays alkaline, I take calcium/magnesium supplements as well as trace mineral supplements, all of which produce an alkaline pH level to outweigh the acidic environment my body would have otherwise produced with my consumption of acid-producing foods. I also make sure over half of every meal consists of raw or very lightly steamed vegetables. I generally snack on a couple pieces of raw fruit every day. Refined foods and sugar are eaten very rarely.

It's pretty easy staying alkaline, once you've learned through testing your urine a few times a day initially to see how you're doing. After a while, you understand the proportions of raw veggies and fruit you need as well as alkalizing minerals to stay alkaline.

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

aquaverde — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:32:55 GMT

Dr. Mercola has addressed many aspects of preventing cancer. However, I am wondering why in his newsletters I've never read anything regarding the incorporation of a regular diet that keeps your pH level slightly alkaline as being key to the prevention of cancerous cells developing. He has mentioned the importance of eating a very high percentage of raw vegatables but hasn't linked the practice of doing this to having an alkaline pH level in your body. Having an alkaline pH level, through my research on this topic, is key to remaining cancer-free.

Otto Warburg proved the underlying cause for all forms of cancer when he won two Nobel Prizes 50 years ago, showing that cancer is caused by a lack of oxygen respiration in cells. in The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancer he states that: "The cause of cancer is no longer a mystery. We know it occurs whenever any cell is denied 60% of its oxygen requirements. Cancer, above all other diseases, has countless secondary causes. But, even for cancer, there is only one prime cause. Summarized in a few words, the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of the respiration of oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar." Having enough oxygen in the body to prevent cancerous cells from developing happens when a person's pH level is slightly alkaline, rather than acidic.

Mercola states the importance of eating raw fruits and vegatables but doesn't connect that in doing this, your body's pH level will be alkaline. Doing this is essential for having enough oxygen in your body fluids, as Warburg proved, to prevent cancer from developing. Informing people on a massive scale about how to keep their pH level consistently alkaline through diet is mandatory to turn the stats around regarding the cases of cancer that continue growing.

I would like Dr. Mercola to addreess the Alkaline diet in his newsletter as a very comprehensive way of taking control over the ability to prevent cancer from developing in the first place

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

linni77 — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:32:17 GMT

There is a cure for breast, prostrate cancer, colon cancer which has received no publicity; and no further action that I can see.

Immunotherapy of metastatic breast cancer patients with vitamin D-binding protein-derived macrophage activating factor (GcMAF).

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.../queryd.fcgi

Immunotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer with vitamin D-binding protein-derived macrophage-activating factor, GcMAF.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.../queryd.fcgi

Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer with Gc Protein-Derived Macrophage-Activating Factor, GcMAF.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.../queryd.fcgi

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

Nathan_203 — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:25:28 GMT

Unfortunately all the money is spent is on finding a "cure" ie drugs, instead of healing, that is, restoring to health.
The media, by creating fear and stress pushes the idea of fighting your disease, and when you see it as a battle, you become locked in.

Check out Friends With Cancer where they have a different attitude to healing and learn to focus on health.
See http://friendswithcancer.com.au

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

Cheryl Rounds — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:55:24 GMT

For great info on cancer and alternative cures see www.cancertutor.com

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

Rogway — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 02:42:12 GMT

I never could get the whole article but...a little story.

I have studied closely a giant tumor on a man's neck. I have studied closely the big knots on my apple tree. They look about 95% identicle. The shape, little red knots. yellowish skin color the whole works. I was told my tree had a fungus.

I always have talked to my apple tree ever since it began to grow. I told it how pretty it is, I praised it, bragged on it an so on and it has flourished. Me and my apple tree are friends.

I can't recall ever having any problem with worms, no worms on or in those apples. Could the worms know that fungus might led to cancer as some reports I have read suggest and are smarter than the thousands of reserchers, scientist and all those putting up billions for more cancer research, or, since I am always nice to my apple tree, it is re-paying the favor by keeping the worms away, or is it trying to tell me something about fungus?

So, one day I mixed up some stuff and droped it on two of the biggest knots on my tree, and guess what, yep you're right, the knots began to dry up. I will watch and listen more to mother nature. True story.

re: Off Target in the War on Cancer

mama bear — Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:15:03 GMT

Actually, Aaltrude, I don't agree. There is no profit in finding a cure-just keeping the status quo with more drug options fueling big pharma profits. I believe there are natural cures such as herbs and strict diet for cancer. Unfortunately there is no profit from them so they are banned by the FDA. I cringe when misguided people are walking for the cure, volleying for the cure, etc because the biggest sponsors of these events are the drug companies like Astra Zenica, Merck, etc.