FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
September 10 2000
723 Views

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

Chest X-Rays Ineffective

 

Yet another high-tech medical intervention fails to show benefit

Screening smokers several times a year with chest X-rays does not reduce their odds of dying from lung cancer and may lead some people to undergo unnecessary treatment for lung tumors that would never have been fatal, new research suggests. The findings call into question the wisdom of using a relatively new, more powerful lung screening technique to detect lung cancer.

  • Researchers at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) assigned more than 9,000 male smokers to undergo a chest X-ray and sputum cytology (examining phlegm under the microscope to detect cancer cells) three times a year for 6 years or were advised to have the same tests only once a year.

  • The first participants were enrolled in 1971, and by 1983, men who underwent frequent screening were no less likely to die from lung cancer than other men.

  • Even after an average of more than 20 years of follow-up, the results were still the same.

"We found no reduction in lung cancer mortality," said one of the researchers in comments to Reuters Health. As a matter of fact, in the intense-screening group, 337 men died from lung cancer, compared with only 303 of the men who were advised to be screened just once a year.

  • According to the authors, the chest x-rays seem to detect some very small or slow-growing lung tumors that may never threaten lives.

  • Additionally, procedures and surgery to evaluate or remove these detected growths can be risky.

Dr. Pamela M. Marcus, of the NCI said that the idea that some lung tumors may be present for years without ever causing symptoms is "pretty heretical," towards the current beliefs. The results of the study should also give doctors second thoughts about using a powerful new imaging test, known as spiral computed tomography (CT), to screen for lung cancer. Although it may be capable of detecting lung lesions in their early stages, there is no proof that the test can reduce lung-cancer deaths.

"It hasn't been shown that spiral CT reduces lung cancer mortality," Dr. Marcus said. "We shouldn't be jumping on the spiral CT bandwagon yet."

Journal of the National Cancer Institute August 16, 2000; 92.



Dr. Mercola Dr. Mercola's Comments:
Well folks here we have it straight from the chiefs at the National Cancer Institute. Screening smokers with chest X-rays is not a helpful screening procedure for lung cancer. As a matter of fact, more men died in the more frequently x-rayed group. This study helps to highlight an important concept that many people are confused about. Screening is not a form of prevention. Additionally, when the screening practices expose the patient to dangerous radiation, they may actually RAISE the cancer risk.

The data collection system of the autonomic nervous system that I described recently however is one of the most exciting tools currently available to identify cancers at an early stage. The technique is completely investigational at this time, but it absolutely non-toxic and very inexpensive. It will be able to detect cancers at far earlier stages than traditional methods. I will likely be offering a 14-hour video instruction course in the near future on how this technique can be performed so stay tuned.

Related Articles:

Vitamins Improve Lung Function

Veggies and Fruits May Improve Lung Function

Fruits And Vegetables Lower Lung Cancer Risk

Vitamin E May Reduce Lung Cancer Risk in Smokers

Mixing Household Cleaners Can Damage Lungs

Vitamins C and E Protect Lungs from Ozone

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 0 )
Comment on this Article

 
Truste
 
Mercola