|
Children with head lice (Pediculus capitis) are
usually sent home from school immediately in order to avoid spreading
the infection to other children. However, problems including overdiagnosis
of head lice and an inability to accurately differentiate between active
and extinct infestations may lead to unnecessary absenteeism and multiple
treatments.
"Children, particularly, are burdened more
by anti-louse policies than by the lice themselves," said lead author
Dr. Richard J. Pollack, of the department of immunology and infectious
diseases at Harvard School of Public Health, according to Reuters Health.
He also suggests that "these policies are unjustified and often discriminate
against the non-infested child."
-
Researchers asked physicians, school nurses
and parent-volunteers to submit hair specimens that they thought contained
lice or louse eggs.
-
According to their report, only about 60% of
the 614 specimens submitted contained lice or their eggs, although
only half of these (30% of the samples) contained a living louse or
nit (louse eggs).
-
About 5% of samples contained some other bug,
such as book lice or bedbugs and 35% contained only dandruff, fibers,
dirt, scabs, skin cells or knotted hair
-
Researchers discovered that physicians were
the least accurate of all the head inspectors, including the parents.
"Flipping a coin might provide a more
accurate 'diagnosis' than that currently delivered in schools and homes
by well-intentioned but misinformed non-experts," Dr. Pollack
said.
The researchers stress the importance of physically
removing all nits, alive or dead, using a fine-tooth comb, otherwise they
could stay attached to the hair for months or even years.
The study's findings suggest that non-infested children
may be excluded from school unnecessarily, and that "No-nit"
policies "are often counterproductive when applied and appear not
to affect prevalence."
"Schools might be advised to repeal their
draconian quarantine requirements when dealing with presumed cases of
head louse infestations, as this is not a public health problem,"
he advised.
The Pediatric Infectious
Disease Journal August, 2000;19:689-693.
|