Systemic lupus erythematosus is one of the innumerable
recognized side effects of a number of vaccinations. One
of the best papers (if not the best on this) is by Ayvazian
and Badger (1948), and it has not lost any of its punch
and relevance since it was published.
They describe three cases of nurses who were literally
vaccinated to death. The authors surveyed a group
of 750 nurses who trained at a large municipal hospital
between 1932 and 1946, and detailed the cases of three nurses
who were vaccinated with a multitude of vaccines over a
period of time and developed and succumbed to disseminated
Typically, these nurses were given the following tests
and vaccines in short succession:
the Schick test;
three days later, the Dick test;
seven days later, typhoid-paratyphoid
seven days later, another typhoid-paratyphoid
vaccine (a double dose);
seven days later, the third typhoid-paratyphoid
and seven days later, the fourth typhoid-paratyphoid
Every time, the recipient developed local erythema and/or
fever and malaise, but it did not deter the doctor from
administering yet another series of vaccines, starting only
14 days after the first lot of tests and typhoid-paratyphoid
This time, after all these injections, one of the trainee
nurses was given her first injection of scarlet fever streptococcus
toxin with "no ill results".
One week later, she was given the second injection of streptococcus
toxin, after which she developed joint pains and fever.
She did not report these reactions to the health office.
Nine days later, she returned and received the third injection
of a fourfold dose of streptococcus, after which she developed
severe joint pain in the fingers and knees and a sore throat.
She was hospitalized for five days and discharged with
the diagnosis "Dick-toxin reaction". Only five
days later her inoculations were continued, first in
lower and then in gradually increasing doses so that the
series included a total of 10 instead of the usual seven
injections. Epinephrine was administered with each of these
injections of streptococcus toxin and toxin-antitoxin.
Two months after the last lot, the trainee nurse was re-admitted
to the hospital with swelling and pain of the ankles and
toes and tenderness of the joints of both hands, which had
been constant since the first Dick test five months earlier.
The diagnosis was "rheumatic arthritis."
She was given aspirin, but two weeks later the pain
came back and she developed chills and fever, sore throat
and cough. One month later, the trainee nurse was readmitted
to hospital for two weeks, and during this admission a streptococcus
vaccine was started in small doses, but because of her severe
reaction "further vaccines were refused."
The diagnosis after this admission was "rheumatoid
arthritis and infectious mononucleosis".
Four months later, the trainee nurse noticed skin eruptions
over her nose and both cheeks, and her saliva became foul.
The skin and cheeks, upper lips and the bridge of the nose
were covered with purplish red, mottled and indurated rash
eruptions. Two months later, the eruptions spread over much
of the body. A year later, the trainee nurse died, but not before developing severe symptoms of high fever,
tachycardia, diarrhea and showing abnormal blood tests.
It was not enough that this unfortunate trainee nurse died;
there were another two cases reported, almost identical
to the first case. We shall never know how many of the remaining
747 trainee nurses developed less lethal, but still health-incapacitating.
If someone said that this type of "medical treatment'
had been given to the inmates of the Nazi concentration
camps, I would not be surprised. However, this type of "medical
treatment" was and is being given with impunity to
millions of babies, children, teenagers and adults in so-called
free and democratic countries as well as in the Third World.
Meanwhile, the health authorities refuse to accept that
vaccines cause such reactions and even deaths.
Vaccination: A Safety
The conclusions which follow the study of relevant medical
and immunological literature dealing with vaccines and the
adjuvants used in vaccines is that the absolute safety
of these substances can never be guaranteed.
According to Gupta et al. (1993), the toxicity of adjuvants
can be ascribed in part to the unintended stimulation of
various mechanisms of the immune response. That's why the
safety and adjuvancy must be balanced to get the maximum
immune stimulation with minimum side effects.
My conclusion is that such balance is impossible to
achieve, even if we fully understood the immune system
and the full spectrum of deleterious effects of foreign
antigens and other toxic substances such as vaccine and
drug adjuvants and medications on the immune system of humans,
and particularly on the immature immune system of babies
and small children.
Injecting any foreign substance straight into the bloodstream
will only cause anaphylactic (sensitization) reactions.
Nature, over thousands and thousands of years, has developed
effective immune responses; yet man, without respect
for nature, demonstrably causes more harm than good.
Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated
non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in
injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or
care as to their effects. Data collection on reactions to
vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness
of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over.
The fact that natural infectious diseases have beneficial
effect on the maturation and development of the immune system
is ignored or deliberately suppressed.
Consequently, parents of small children and any potential
recipients of vaccines and any orthodox medications should
be wary of any member of the medical establishment (which
is little more than a highly politicized business system)
extolling the nonexistent virtues of vaccination.
You can go on to the more technically oriented manuscript
which details many of the specifics of vaccine adjuvants.