Dr. Mercola March 06 2002 5,462 views
Amid ongoing controversy about the ability of mammography exams to lower women's risk of death from breast cancer, US health officials February 21 released new clinical guidelines recommending even more widespread use of mammograms to detect the disease.
The new guidelines, issued by the US Preventive Services Task Force, call on all women over 40 to receive screening mammograms every 1 to 2 years, though the specific interval is left up to women and their doctors.
Previous recommendations issued by the task force in 1989 and 1996 reserved screening for women over 50 years of age.
Officials said they did not have strong enough scientific evidence to recommend the age at which women should receive their first mammogram, or at exactly what interval they should go for repeat screenings.
Officials gave widespread mammography strong backing even as scientists continue to grapple with the ramifications of a Danish study released in October 2001 that questioned the value of mammogram screening in reducing breast cancer mortality.
The authors of that study, published in the British medical journal The Lancet, concluded that previous research showing a benefit was flawed and that widespread mammogram screening is unjustified.
Specifically, the Danish researchers argued that earlier studies in Europe and North America were improperly randomized and that they used a faulty definition of breast cancer survival.
Reviewers had been working on the guidelines since first convening in 1998 and that last October's Danish review did not cause them to speed up their release. Still, the National Cancer Institute offered its endorsement to the new recommendations before its scientific review committee issued a report on the overall quality of mammography data.
Officials stressed that mammography screening is not foolproof.
The technology carries a first-time false positive rate of up to 6%. False positives can lead to expensive repeat screenings and can sometimes result in unnecessary invasive procedures including biopsies and surgeries.
Reuters Washington February 21, 2002
Let me summarize this for you.
The European experts' formal review cannot find any evidence for the benefit of mammograms.
Screening mammography provides about 1,000 times greater radiation exposure than that from a chest X-ray.
Even the National Cancer Institute finds that monthly breast self-examination (BSE) following brief training, coupled with annual clinical breast examination (CBE) by a trained health care professional, is at least as effective as mammography.
I don't get it. I just don't understand how these U.S. "experts" can come up with a recommendation to increase the use of mammography and add billions of wasted dollars to our health care budget with no benefit and causing increased cancers in many women.
This just doesn't add up from my perspective.
Bottom line?
Avoid mammograms and be diligent about regular breast self-exams. Breast cancer is the leading cancer in women and is a real issue.
Take proactive steps by stopping estrogen replacement therapy unless you have had your ovaries removed.
Also, increase your vitamin D intake.
Related Articles:
More on the Dangers of Mammography Should You Get a Mammogram? Mammograms Worthless Over Breast Exam Alone Continued Debate Over Mammograms' Value Medicine Mum on Mammography: Do the Math
More on the Dangers of Mammography
Should You Get a Mammogram?
Mammograms Worthless Over Breast Exam Alone
Continued Debate Over Mammograms' Value
Medicine Mum on Mammography: Do the Math
THANK YOU FOR ALL THE GREAT INFORMATION ON HEALTH ISSUES! IN NOVEMBER OF 2007 IT WAS ADVISED THAT I TAKE BONE DENSITY MEDICATION, CALCITONIN. I SPRAYED THIS IN MY NOSE THREE TIMES. TWICE ON THE RIGHT SIDE. THE FOURTH DAY I COULD HARDLY GET OUT OF BED, MY LOWER BACK WAS AFFECTED. IT TOOK TWO WEEKS BEFORE I COULD STRAIGHTEN UP. THE BACK PAIN AND BONE PAIN IN THE RIBS WAS SO EXTREME THAT IT WAS 6 MONTHS BEFORE I COULD WEAR A BRA. I STARTED P.T FOR MY BACK. DIDN'T HELP. CHIROPRACTOR WAS BETTER. TWO DAYS AFTER I TOOK THE MEDICATION MY LEFT KNEE STARTED SWELLING AND I GOT A LUMP ON MY ELBOW. MY NOSE STARTED BLEEDING! WHEN I HAD MY BREAST EXAM IN MAY OF 2008, I HAD CYST,
DURING THE 19 MONTHS!! I HAVE HAD TO HAVE KNEE SURGERY, NOSE BLEEDS ALMOST EVERY DAY,ARE ABOUT EVERY 3 WEEKS NOW, THE LUMP ON THE ELBOW WENT FROM A MARBLE SIZE TO A GOLF BALL SIZE IN THREE MONTHS AND SURGERY ON THE ELBOW. I HAVE BEEN IN P.T SENSE EARLY 2-2009 FOR BACK AND KNEE. THIS MEDICATON SEEMED TO HAVE AN AFFECT ON MY B-12 FOR SOME REASON AND I HAVE TO TAKE B-12 SHOTS.
GOOD NEWS! I AM FINALLY GETTING BACK ON TRACK WITH MY HEALTH FOOD @ NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS. A GREAT P.T. I AM BACK TO THE GYM 2 TWICE A WEEK AND I FINISH THE P.T NEXT WEEK. KNEE IS NOT SWELLING AS MUCH. THE MAMMOGRAM IS NOW NORMAL! I AM 76 AND WAS IN GREAT SHAPE AND WORKED OUT 3 TIMES A WEEK BEFORE THIS MEDICATION.
TWO OTHER BONE DENSITY MED THAT I TRIED WERE SIDE AFFECTS TOO. I BROKE OUT IN BLISTERS, LOOKED LIKE CHICKEN POX, THE OTHER ONE I WAS SO OUT OF IT I DON'T REMEMBER MUCH FOR ONE WEEK. MY WHOLE BODY WAS AFFECTED, BONE PAIN AND HEADACHE, COULDN'T MOVE MY ARMS, COULDN'T BEND AT THE ELBOWS. IT TOOK ABOUT 3 MONTHS BEFORE I WAS BACK ON TRACK.
I AM STILL WORKING WITH THE SAME DOCTOR ON V-D AND BONE CALCIUM. SO FAR I HAVE NOT LOST ANY MORE BONE DENSITIY.
WITH MY AGE AND BONE LOSS I HAVE TO EXERCISE! I FEEL BETTER AND I AM NOT STIFF, DON'T HURT MY SELF AND BETTER BALANCE. NELLIE