FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
December 18 2002
44,886 Views

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

Diet Success - Know Your Nutritional Typing - Part 2

 

Part 1 of 2 (Part 2)

By William Wolcott, Founder, The Healthexcel System of Metabolic Typing
Author, The Metabolic Typing Diet (Doubleday)

As a reader of this web site, it is likely that you've reached the point where you think or even know that nutrition is important if you ever want to get well and stay well. It's just common sense, right?

But you may also have come to feel that the field of nutrition is quite baffling. And that even though there is more information available today than ever before, that it's also become harder to find what's really right for you or to decide just what you should do.

In a very real sense, the information explosion over the last 10 years has quite possibly brought more confusion than clarity to your quest for health. As a result, you may have found yourself asking questions like:

  • Why is it that my best friend's nutritional supplements work absolute miracles, but make me feel lousy?
  • How can one best selling book say one thing about nutrition, and the other bestseller say just the opposite?
  • Why will a certain diet give my friend energy and help to lose weight but make me tired and gain weight?
  • Why can't I get rid of my candida overgrowth problem, even though I've followed an "anti-candida" diet?
  • How can someone eat the best organic foods, take the finest nutritional supplements that money can buy, get plenty of rest, exercise regularly... and still not feel well?

Or maybe your concern is with more serious issues like...

  • Why are two thirds of Americans overweight?
  • How can so many people be obese when people are more diet-, health- and exercise-conscious than ever before?
  • Why is degenerative disease skyrocketing?
  • Why are younger and younger people falling prey to diseases of the aged?
  • Why are cancer, heart disease and diabetes increasing each year?

And if you're a health professional working with nutrition, you may also be baffled by questions such as...

  • Why does a low fat, low protein, high complex carbohydrate diet raise cholesterol in some people instead of lower it like it does in other people?
  • Why does taking a nutritional product or protocol help one person with a problem but not another with the same problem?
  • If nutrition is so important, why doesn't it work for so many people?

Everywhere you look, there are contradictions. Your friend tells you one thing. You read about just the opposite in a health magazine. And a hot new bestseller at your local book store says something quite different altogether. In fact, that's another problem -- wall-to-wall books on health and nutrition, most of which just contradict each other.

And, maybe you've learned from your own experience that what works for one person, doesn't help a second and can actually make a third person worse! Don't worry, it's not you. Even scientific researchers are confused by their findings because most studies on nutrients conclude that while helpful to a certain percentage of people with a certain condition, the studied nutrients don't help or even worsen the same condition in other test subjects.

So how can there be so much confusion and contradiction about something that is supposed to be so good for you?

The unfortunate reason is that the majority of the people talking about nutrition know just enough to be dangerous. They know that nutrition can be the answer, but they don't know how to use it properly. And, yes, it is a two-edged sword: If you use it properly, it can help make you well. But, make no mistake. If you use it improperly, it can help make you sick or keep you that way.

You know. Take this nutrient for that condition. A magic bullet. One standard nutritional remedy for each problem or a universal diet that is supposed to work for everyone.

But, your own experience and all the contradictory books and articles that you've ever read, aside from making the field of nutrition confusing, frustrating and sometimes downright baffling, have already shown you that this approach doesn't work. And your common sense agrees. You know that you are unique! You know one shoe size doesn't fit all. You know that everyone is as unique as their fingerprints. So, why would anyone ever think that one diet is right for everyone? Or, that what works nutritionally for one person would work for another as well?

The fact is, you really can eat the best organic foods, exercise regularly, drink plenty of fluids, get sufficient rest, take the finest supplements that money can buy... and still not feel well, or even start feeling worse than before!

So, what is the answer? The answer is to find out what is right for you!

Not what some book says. Not what a friend says. Not what the latest fad says is right. You need to find out exactly what is right for YOU! A nutritional program that is tailored specifically for your kind of metabolism and that will meet the special and unique nutritional needs of the one and only you.

Bottom line? Unless you match your nutrition to your metabolism, you'll only be wasting your time and money!

So why is it so hard to find right answers? How do you know who to believe or who to trust?

The answer is to this universal dilemma is that for decades, the wrong questions have been asked. Ask wrong questions and you're bound to get wrong answers to your needs.

The problem is that the quest for the "holy grail" in nutrition has been to find that "right diet," that "healthy diet" that is right for all people. And the quest has been to find the one right nutritional protocol for each condition.

But what has been missed is the undeniable fact that on a biochemical level each of us is as unique as we are in our fingerprints. Actually our uniqueness extends far beyond just our fingerprints and encompasses virtually every aspect of ourselves -- personality, behavior, temperament, external physical traits, internal size, shape, placement and efficiency of all of our organs and glands, and rates of our cellular metabolism. Simply put, our DNA is unique.

Standardized nutritional approaches fail to recognize that, for genetic reasons, people are all very different from one another on a biochemical or metabolic level. Due to widely varying hereditary influences, we all process or utilize foods and nutrients very differently. Thus, the very same nutritional protocol that enables one person to lead a long healthy life full of robust health can cause serious illness in someone else. As the ancient Roman philosopher Lucretius once said, "One man's food is another's poison." It turns out, his statement is quite literally true.

What accounts for all this metabolic individuality?

At any given point in time, there are a number of factors that determine peoples' unique nutritional requirements, but none is more significant than a person's ancestral heritage. It's a matter of classic Darwinian principles of evolution and adaptation, natural selection, genetic mutation and survival of the fittest. Over thousands of years of evolutionary history, people in different parts of the world developed very specific dietary needs as an adaptation mechanism, in response to many unique aspects of their habitats and lifestyles -- including climate, geography, vegetation, and naturally occurring food supplies.

As an example, people from cold northern regions of the world have historically relied very heavily on animal protein, simply because that's the primary food source available in wintry climates. Thus they have radically different nutritional needs than people from tropical regions, where the environment is rich in vegetative diversity year round.

In the early part of the 20th century, a brilliant scientist by the name of Weston Price, DDS, demonstrated this in no uncertain terms. He traveled all over the world and sought out all the indigenous populations to study their diet and their health. His discoveries were remarkable and extremely important. What he discovered was that:

  • The diets of all the indigenous peoples were tremendously varied (being dependent on geography, climate and the food stuffs naturally available)
  • Yet those indigenous people who followed their ancestral diets were robustly healthy.
  • But those who moved away or for other reasons strayed from their ancestral diet developed degenerative processes.

What can we learn from this?

  • First and foremost, there is no one diet that is right for everyone, i.e., there never has been and there never will be a universally healthy diet.
  • Second, the only healthy diet is the one that meets one's genetically-based requirements -- not what some book or diet expert says is right. Eat a diet that is right for your metabolic type and not only can you stay healthy but you can reverse degenerative conditions as well.
  • Third, there are no good foods and there are no bad foods, except in terms of foods that are right or wrong for your genetic makeup. Think meat is bad for you? Then how do you explain the Inuit (Eskimo) who eats up to 10 pounds of meat a day, yet there isn't even a word in their language for cancer or heart disease. Think a high carb diet is bad for you? Then how do you explain the Quetchus of South America or the East Indians who have lived for countless generations on a near vegetarian diet? Think dairy is bad for you? Then how do you explain the Swiss whose ancestral diet was largely based on dairy and rye?

Your body is designed to be healthy. Good health is your birthright. The ability to experience radiant health is part of the genetic code built into every cell in your body. What you need to do in order to reclaim your birthright is to understand what your body needs as opposed to someone else's, in order to function the way it was intended it to. In short, you need to eat right for your metabolic type.

In a previous era, before the age of modern transportation, cultures were isolated and peoples' metabolic makeup and corresponding dietary needs were very clear. But in today's day and age, due to extensive intermingling of cultures, we've become a true "genetic melting pot." In the U.S. in particular, most of us have many different ethnic and hereditary influences. As a result, few of us have a distinct ancestral heritage or readily identifiable dietary needs.

Fortunately, however, through the research that has been done over the past 25 years, there is available a systematic, testable, repeatable and verifiable advanced nutritional technology that enables people to discover their own unique dietary needs with a very high degree of precision. This technology is known as Metabolic Typing. Through metabolic typing those often mysterious, seemingly unanswerable questions become perfectly clear and answerable indeed.

Once you know your metabolic type and you know what foods are right for you and what foods are wrong for you, then you need a simple to follow, step-by-step plan to help you transition into a healthy lifestyle that you can follow for the rest of your life. You'll find none better than Dr. Mercola's Nutrition Plan.

[ Continue to Part 2 ]



Dr. Mercola Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Foundational to my entire dietary and health program, provided for you in detail in my new book, Dr. Mercola's Total Health Program, is metabolic typing. There are different metabolic types of people, as William Wolcott points out in the article above, and each body type demands more of certain types of food and less of another.

This is why you may respond well to a low-carb diet while, say, your best friend, on the same exact diet, may not. This understanding of the different metabolic types is built into my nutrition plan -- I make general recommendations about all the various foods, but urge you, just as I insist with my patients here at the clinic, to understand your metabolic type in order to consume the optimal amount of each of those foods.

My new book provides a deeper understanding of metabolic typing and a test to assess your general type. William Wolcott, who contributed the article above, is the author of The Metabolic Typing Diet; this is also an important read providing all you need to know about metabolic typing, and a perfect companion book to mine. However you learn your metabolic type, I strongly urge you to do so -- otherwise you are not even giving your body a fair chance to succeed at a proper diet.

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 6 )
Comment on this Article
  
  
You Are What You Eat
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on September 20, 2008 ]
       
   
 
Novice User

Lately I have been feeling like total crap, Freezing to the point of of numb hands, my hairs are sticking up from my arms and legs, total exhaustions, anxiety and i think it has relation to my diet..I carefully watch what i eat everyday, my days starts with some raw eggs and a piece of fruit then some type of raw organic meat made with ghee, some sprouted grain bread to make an amazing burger..but to my conclusion its been making me feel ill, and i know its not the raw food because i used to eat this all the time and have a great workout. Now i feel cold don't move much and feel like im already dead, and its sucks/ has to change. I personally think my adrenal glands are exhausted from my lifestyle change. Moved from a warmer climate to a cold climate. and with that change came the change of me eating more raw fat and protein..Hasnt helped..it has however raised my adrenaline enough to want to really kick ass..IN other words i think this diet has increased my flight to fight response and totally killed my way of life : (  If i were to change back to Carb and protein type, what carbs can i eat besides pineapples apples maybe some cauliflower(makes me feel great)..Please help honestly i can wait to live normally again!

 [ Reply ]
  
  
bob taylor
[ Joined on 05/07 ] [ Posted on March 15, 2008 ]
       
   
 
Novice User

i need to know what type of metabolic type i am.  i know i do so much better on a high protien diet than on a high carbo diet.  i go to a cafeteria and find myself going for the salad bar and the meat of the day.

i get along so much better on that kind of diet than if i just ate high carbo and vegetables.  i get so sleepy after eating high carbos than vegetables and protien.  when i go out i do not usually go to a

italian restaurant diet.  although i do love to  eat Eastern india food which is very flavorful and satisfying. my wife nancy goes for italian ever time, she loves her toast and bagels and i get along on scrambled eggs and sausage.  so we are often at odds over the meals we prepare.  she loves potatoes and carrots along with onions in our beef stew and i go for brussel sprouts and brocholi  and beans.  help?

 [ Reply ]
  
  
Nub
[ Joined on 10/07 ] [ Posted on March 11, 2008 ]
       
   
 
This user is BELOW novice level and all their comments need to be reviewed with great caution.

Why is there a link to Pt. 2 at the bottom of the page that is Pt. 2? (and another link to Pt. 2 at the top)

 [ Reply ]
  
  
dendo
[ Joined on 02/08 ] [ Posted on March 4, 2008 ]
       
   
 
Novice User

I think your diet is far more complex than just a "Metabolic typing" - seasons, availability, what someone is trying to achieve - loose weight, build muscle... Using extreme examples of people eating extreme diets in areas where that might be the case is an over simplification. I think a balanced natural diet, listening to your body, and eating what your body is calling for at the time, is far more important. I think that although there might be some merit to this idea it is being given too much credit for being the solution - just another fade diet. Please respond to this, I would like to know what you think.

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
mommaterra
[ Joined on 03/08 ]  [ Posted on April 19, 2008]
       
   
Novice User
  Mercola

I have found, as a diabetic, that most of us who are diabetic are also quite sensitive to carbs.  Some of the 'proof' in typing onself is in factors like this.  Variations for diabetics are in food fat comfort.  I can eat 80% food fat calories, and be quite comfy; not everyone is Inuit.  Still, I have to stick to maybe 5% carbs.  I have a friend who is 64 years old, a farmer and an avid baker and grain-eater, who is completely comfortable on her way of eating.  Certainly good, fresh foods are important, but there are truly ancestral variations, and one single plan does NOT fit for all.  It's easy to disparage others' eating styles as fad diets, but if they work for health, and are comfortable, then there's no fad.  

The other thing that Mercola and so many others miss is the natural variation in body adiposity.  Why is it that we can 'get' those other variations (food content, height, etc.) but we can't accept that not everyone is set up to be thin.  Especially we can't let women, who need fat for childbearing, be fat at all.  We get arrogant and confuse aethetics (and control of women) with health.  Remember, fat women live longest in all those longitudinal studies, and unless you insist that death is healthier, it's pretty clear that fatness equals better health!

  
  
Strongheart
[ Joined on 01/08 ] [ Posted on March 4, 2008 ]
       
   
 
Novice User

The links to part 1 and part 2 are screwed up.

 [ Reply ]

 
Truste
 
Mercola