What Causes Most Car Accidents?

Previous Article Next Article
March 26, 2003 | 28,663 views

While cell phones have recently sprung up as a common cause of car accidents, a study, the largest to date on crashes involving distracted drivers, found that rubbernecking causes far more accidents than cell phone use.

The largest number of accidents was caused by drivers looking at other accidents, traffic or roadside incidents. Comparatively, cell phone use ranked as the sixth highest cause. The study included data on more than 2,700 accidents involving distracted drivers between June and November 2002.

Moreover, some 98 percent of the accidents reported involved a single distracted driver.

According to the study, rubbernecking accounted for 16 percent of accidents reported. This was followed by driver fatigue, which was responsible for 12 percent, looking at scenery or landmarks (10 percent), passenger or child distractions (nine percent), adjusting the radio, tape or CD player (seven percent), and cell phone use (five percent).

Distractions from inside the vehicle accounted for 62 percent of the distractions reported while distractions from outside the vehicle accounted for 35 percent, and three percent of the distractions were undetermined.

Of the crashes that occurred in rural areas, nearly two-thirds of the crashes reported, common causes included driver fatigue, insects entering or striking the vehicle, or animals and unrestrained pet distractions.

In urban areas, automobile accidents caused by distracted drivers were often due to drivers looking at other crashes, traffic or vehicles, or cell phone use.

Researchers say that the findings likely apply to many regions in the United States because the study included a mix of rural and urban counties, a diverse ethnic population, and varying road conditions and types.

The Washington Post March 17, 2003

So cell phonesappear to only be a minor influence in car accidents. It isnot clear to me if this is just because not as many peopleare using them in the car and it takes awhile for the statisticsto manifest themselves, or if indeed it is not a major risk.

What is clearis that rubbernecking is something that is best avoided. WhenI use to drive in on the Chicago expressway to college 30years ago, one of the major challenges I had was the trafficdelays that resulted from those who had to slow down or stopto see an accident in the opposite facing lanes.

It turns outthat this behavior actually causes accidents in addition towasting the time of all those on the road. So if you findthat you engage in this habit please consider revising it.

RelatedArticles:

CellPhones: How Risky are They Really?