By
Bronwyn Hancock
Vaccination
Information Service
We have all been repeatedly told that vaccination is both
safe and protective of children against dangerous diseases.
Many parents upon learning of adverse effects realize that
their trust has been betrayed--that vaccines are not safe
at all. However, it is common for them to continue to trust
that vaccines are effective and that the diseases they purportedly
prevent are dangerous. This creates a terrible dilemma for
these parents, who end up feeling that either way they are
taking a risk.
However, with more investigation increasing numbers of parents
are discovering that nature is not so cruel as to force such
a difficult dilemma on them. The full reality is that not
only do childhood illnesses (provided they are properly managed)
have a priming and maturing role in immune system development
rather than being dangerous to unvaccinated children[1], but
also vaccines have never prevented any diseases. Other factors
have clearly been responsible for the declines that have occurred,
and the very toxic and invasive nature of vaccines that causes
the observed adverse effects also makes them counterproductive
for their very purpose of protecting against diseases.
Rather than discussing the statistical evidence, false assumptions
and misinterpretations relating to the myth of vaccination
effectiveness, which are covered by various books and Web
sites, what is far less widely known, and what I will cover
here, is the actual effect that vaccines have on the immune
system, which causes them to be counterproductive.
I must give credit for my awareness of this to Dr. Viera
Scheibner, who is arguably unsurpassed in her width of knowledge
and depth of understanding of the vaccination issue, having
studied over 100,000 pages of medical research on the subject.
Having worked closely with her over a number of years, I have
read much of the most revealing research that she has uncovered.
There are two main causes of the problem: the toxic nature
of the ingredients in vaccines and the invasive form of delivery.
Ingredients, the Injection Process
and the Result
At the bottom of this article is a brochure that summarizes
the subject and starts with a list of the ingredients in vaccines.
In respect to these, first there are those that are poisonous
by their very nature regardless of how they are administered
such as formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum compounds, phenol,
acetone and antifreeze. It is well established that such poisons,
even on their own, are immune system SENSITIZERS. This means
they make the immune system more sensitive, or less able to
cope appropriately with foreign substances that it encounters.
Then there are other ingredients such as animal organ tissue
and blood that our bodies would not have a problem with IF
they entered the body orally because our digestive system
breaks down foreign proteins, unusable in that form, into
their constituent amino acids, which are then absorbable and
useable by the body.
However, our immune systems have not been designed to deal
with foreign proteins being injected. In fact the injection
of any foreign substance is well known to suppress the proper
functioning of the immune system[2], and vaccination is no
exception[3].
Effects
The immune system becomes derailed and confused, and often
even when these proteins subsequently are encountered by a
natural portal of entry (e.g. through the digestive system
or lungs), the immune system reacts. This of course is what
is known as an allergic response. One manifestation of this,
asthma, kills over 10,000 people annually in the United States.
Other effects include more serious "atypical" forms
of the targeted diseases[4] and a reversed ratio of T4 and
T8 cells[5] that characterizes a host of modern immunodeficiencies
including autoimmune diseases, cancer (now in the young),
chronic fatigue syndrome and AIDS. All of these conditions
were unknown before the vaccination era. (See accompanying
brochure for a more complete list of vaccination effects.)
Bypassing Vital Defenses
Another problem with the injection process in respect to
any viruses and bacteria that are being administered is that
very important outer levels of defense are bypassed, giving
them deep access into the body to cause damage. Hence, for
example, the now well known finding of the vaccine strain
of the measles virus in the gut of a significant proportion
of autistic children.
It has also been found that animal, bacterial and viral DNA,
when injected, can be incorporated into the recipient’s
DNA[6]. No wonder vaccination has been linked to cancer, particularly
considering vaccine ingredients even include animal cancer
cells (used for the culturing of viruses because they continue
to multiply).
Some Babies Just Cannot Cope
Some babies lose the battle against the invasive toxic assault
of vaccination in hours, days or weeks. If the parents are
"lucky" it is diagnosed as cot death, or if an organ
fails it is classified simply as failure of that organ (e.g.
kidney failure). However, if injuries such as subdural hematomas
or retinal hemorrhages are found, the parents (or other care-giver)
find themselves falsely accused of murder in the form of "shaken
baby" syndrome.
Vaccine-Induced Antibodies Do NOT
Indicate Immunity
What causes confusion to many medical doctors is that part
of the sensitization reaction to vaccination is the production
of antibodies. This is falsely equated with the opposite,
intended effect, which is to bring immunity. The aluminum
compounds are even included for this very purpose (as "adjuvants")
to artificially force the production of a significant number
of virus-specific IgG antibodies, because the immune system
does not naturally produce them (in significant levels) on
demand by injections[7].
However, the IgG antibodies thus produced only show that
there has been exposure to that virus. Their presence does
not mean immunity. The secretory IgA antibody, which does
NOT get produced by injections because injections bypass the
outer level processes of the immune system, has been found
to be a far better measure of immunity[8].
This is why contracting tetanus, the well known way being
by a deep puncture wound, which is just like an injection,
does not bring immunity. The result is even said to be "sensitization"
to tetanus in the future. Immunity can develop, however, if
the bacteria enter via the natural portals of entry, often
without the person even being ill with it. When it comes in
through the natural portals of entry it is also in its aerobic
form, which does not produce the neurotoxins that cause the
characteristic tetanus symptoms such as locked jaw and tetanic
spasms.
Variations in Effects Occur, but
No-one Benefits
The fact that some children do not have noticeable adverse
effects to vaccination does not mean that for them the procedure
is beneficial, it is just that we have great variations in:
-
level, type and time of manifestation of susceptibility
between individuals, and
-
levels of toxins between vaccine batches--there is a
lack of control of toxicity levels
The effects are also accumulative, so a child who reacts
very little, if at all, after one dose could be badly affected,
even killed, by a subsequent dose.
Summary
Vaccination does nothing clever. With all of its good intent
it just ends up being an injection of a large variety of different
kinds of poisons deep into the body. The effect is an increase,
not decrease, in susceptibility to the very disease it is
trying to prevent; a host of immune system problems and damage
to any organ or system. Even its purpose is unwanted interference--an
attempt to prevent diseases that have an important role in
immune system development.
For more information on vaccination visit the Vaccination
Information Service Web site.
References:
[1]
Ronne 1985 Lancet:1-5; West 1966 Cancer:1001-1007; Wrensch
et al. 2001 Am J Epidemiology 154:161-165; Alm et al. Lancet
353: 1485-1488; Johnston and Openshaw BMJ 2001 322:377-378
[2]
Mosby’s Medical, Nursing and Allied Health Dictionary
- see "anaphylaxis" (=sensitization)
[3]
Kind, L.S. Sensitivity of pertussis-inoculated mice to endotoxin.
J Immunology 1959:82 p32-7; Samore and Siber. Effect of
Pertussis Toxin on Susceptibility of Infant Rats to Haem
In Type b (=Hib). The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1992
165:945-8; Schreurs AJ, Nijkamp FP. Bronchial hyper-reactivity
to histamine induced by Haemophilus influenzae vaccination.
Agents Actions 1984 Oct,15(3-4):211-5.
[4]
Ibid -- see "atypical measles"
[5]
Eibl 1984 NEJM: 198-199; Rook and Zumla 1997 Lancet:1831-1833
[6]
Stroun, M; Anker, P.(Department of Plant Physiology,University
of Geneva) World Medicine, September 22, 1971 and (same
authors) International Review of Cytology, 1977, Volume
51.
[7]
Dirty Secrets, New Scientist, 2 Nov 1996, pp 26-29
[8]
Bellanti, J. Biologic significance of the secretory IgA
immunoglobulins (E. Mead Johnson Award Address), Pediatrics,
Nov 1971, Vol 48, No. 5, pp 715-729.