SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Share this article
Previous Article
Next Article
What is the Vitamin Most People in the U.S. are Deficient In?
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
February 11 2004 | 3,532 views

By John Jacob Cannell, MD, executive director of The Vitamin D Council

One thing most Americans seem to believe is that sunlight must be avoided for it causes skin cancer, especially malignant melanoma. We decided to give a little quiz about the subject.

1. What is the vitamin most people in the United States are deficient in?

    1. Vitamin C
    2. Vitamin K
    3. Vitamin D
    4. Vitamin E

The answer is 3, vitamin D.

2. Imagine that Dr. von Eschenbach, M.D., the director of the National Cancer Institute (NCI), visited his dermatologist who examined him and diagnosed a small squamous cell cancer on his nose. His dermatologist, who noted that Dr. von Eschenbach had the quaint custom of regularly exposing his body to short courses of noonday sunlight on the roof of the National Library of Medicine, advised Dr. von Eschenbach to now totally avoid the sun.

As Dr. von Eschenbach has read every scientific article ever written on cancer, his reaction was:

  • He thanked his dermatologist but knowing the prognosis is grim for those who develop squamous cell skin cancers, went home and wrote a will.

  • He immediately arranged to have a complete examination by an internist as Dr. von Eschenbach knows his chances of developing internal squamous cell cancers is much higher after being diagnosed with a squamous cell skin cancer.

  • He knew he must now avoid the sun entirely, so he bought cases of sunblock and lots of clothes that would totally protect his skin. He vowed to never let another ultraviolet ray of sunlight ever strike his unprotected skin.

  • He jumped up, smiled broadly, hugged his dermatologist, arranged to have the skin cancer removed, put some unblock on his face and hands, took of his shirt and changed into shorts for the walk to his car and then drove home to tell his loved ones the good news.

The correct answer is D. Dr. von Eschenbach knows that virtually all squamous cell skin cancers are easily treated when caught early and that fewer than 600 Americans die every year from squamous cell skin cancers compared to tens of thousands who may be dying from internal malignancies induced by vitamin D deficiency.

Furthermore, he knows the strong inverse relationship between squamous cell skin cancers and the subsequent development of internal cancers has been known more than 60 years. He also knows that inverse relationship led to one of the first modern theories of cancer (that squamous cell skin cancers conferred immunity against various visceral cancers), which is better explained by sun exposure increasing both squamous cell skin cancers and calcidiol levels.

Furthermore, he knows that the inverse association between sun exposure and several common internal malignancies is robust and has been documented repeatedly. Furthermore, he knows that one of the best things he can do to reduce his chance of getting up to 13 different serious internal cancers is to continue to maintain his healthful levels of serum calcidiol [25(OH) D] by consistent safe sun exposure. If he preferred to totally avoid the sun and oily fish, relying on vitamin D supplements instead, he would need to take between 3,000 to 5,000 IU of cholecalciferol a day to maintain a 25 (OH)D level above 40 ng/ml.

References:

3. The latest evidence suggests 21,000 Americans die every year from internal malignancies associated with inadequate UVB exposure?

A. True
B. False

True. Actually Grant feels the number is an underestimate and is coming out with an even more frightening estimate.

References:

  • Cancer March 15, 2002;94(6):1867-75

4. As malignant melanoma is caused by chronic sun exposure, the incidence of malignant melanoma is more common on the hands, is more common in those who work outdoors and is less common in those who use sunscreen.

A. True
B. False

False. Although malignant melanoma does increase with age, the increase is not dramatic as it is with the skin cancer most clearly associated with chronic sun-exposure, squamous cell skin cancer. And, unlike squamous cell carcinoma, malignant melanoma is most common on relatively less exposed areas (backs in men and upper legs in women), is less common in outdoor workers than indoor ones and evidence to date does not show regular sunscreen use reduces its incidence.

Instead of being caused by chronic sun-exposure, malignant melanoma is a multifactorial disease, the sun-exposure component of which appears to be best explained by repeated intermittent intense exposure (sunburn) in a population that usually avoids the sun (vitamin D-deficient population).

References:

5. For many years, the regular use of sunblock may have actually increased the incidence of melanoma.

A. True
B. False

True. Until a few years ago, sunblock usually blocked the burning (and vitamin D producing) UVB while allowing the more deeply penetrating, UVA. Thus, they may have contributed to the rising incidence of malignant melanoma by allowing users to stay in the sun for hours without burning, while their skin soaked up the highly penetrating UVA radiation.

The best sunlight recommendations to prevent malignant melanoma may turn out to be to regularly expose your entire unsunblocked skin to very short periods (one-third the time it takes for your skin to begin to redden) of direct noonday sunlight during the correct season of the year being careful to never let your skin get red or burn.

References:

6. Pretend that Kenneth, director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, was asked if the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) recommendations to totally avoid sunlight might have helped cause the rising incidence of melanoma and other diseases over the last 20 years by contributing to the current pandemic of vitamin D deficiency. What should his answer be?

A. Yes
B. No

Yes. The American Academy of Dermatology press releases and spokesmen are particularly misinformed about vitamin D and appear to be giving information that increase the risks of developing a multitude of vitamin D deficiency-related illness (including hypertension, heart disease, cancer, autoimmune disease, diabetes, depression, and, perhaps, even malignant melanoma).

Raymond L. Cornelison Jr., MD, president of the American Academy of Dermatology said, " People who practice proper sun protection and are concerned that they are not getting enough vitamin D should either take a multivitamin or drink a few glasses of vitamin D-fortified milk every day. The dangers of exposing oneself to carcinogenic UV light from the sun, even for a few minutes, are firmly established, particularly since dietary intake of vitamin D can completely and easily fulfill our needs."

Dr. Cornelison and the AAD are putting their member dermatologists at risk for future malpractice liability with such incompetent advice. When dermatologists assume control of the vitamin D system by recommending their patients terminate sun exposure, they are required to ensure their patients have an adequate vitamin D status and that can only be assured by 25(OH) D (calcidiol) levels. Dr. Cornelison seems to be unaware that diet, without sunlight, can rarely supply adequate vitamin D and that one multivitamin (400 IU of vitamin D) a day, without sunlight, will actually ensure vitamin D deficiency.

Just like an anesthesiologist, who assumes responsibility for the airway on the patient she intubates, dermatologists who tell patients to totally avoid the sun assume responsibility for their patients' vitamin D system. A number of academic dermatologists have said just that. See if you can pick out the following quote in the two references listed below: "It would seem mandatory to ensure an adequate vitamin D3 status if sun exposure were seriously curtailed, certainly in relation to carcinoma of breast, prostate and colon and probably also malignant melanoma." Coming from an academic dermatology center, it sounds like the kind of statement that juries take into account when trying to decide the applicable Standards of Care.

References:

Humans evolved naked in the sun and have lived most of our time on earth within 30 degrees of the equator. Clothes are a recent addition, as are the vitamin D-reducing effects of cities, indoor work, automobiles and sunblock. We will ask one more question.

7. The majority of Americans have 25(OH)D (calcidiol) levels most similar to which of the following groups:

A. Old World, non-human primates living in the wild.
B. New World non-human primates living in the wild.
C. Modern-day agricultural humans living near the equator.
D. Modern-day humans spending some of their time in a natural state (lifeguards).
E. Lab rats.

You guessed it!


Dr. Mercola''s Comments
Dr. Mercola's Comments:
Follow me on facebook

It is difficult to appreciate that one is at the beginning of a revolution when you are there. Who among you realized that the Web would be what it is today 10 years ago. Virtually no one. Similarly, we are in the midst of a radical revision of vitamin D understanding. The leading vitamin D scientists in the world have changed their position within the last few years and have started the warning sirens that most of traditional medicine was dead wrong when it comes to sun avoidance. Following the ridiculous recommendations of avoiding the sun has caused a minimum of 20,000 extra cancers per year, and it is far more likely the number actually exceeds 50,000.

That is just cancer deaths, folks. It does not include heart disease or autoimmune diseases like MS or rheumatoid arthritis. The old RDA of 400 units was only put together to prevent rickets. It was established long before the appreciation of sun exposure and optimized vitamin D levels. The requirements for vitamin D are far closer to 10 times the current RDA, or 4,000 units. If you only took the RDA of 400 units of vitamin D and avoided the sun you can be virtually guaranteed you would be vitamin D deficient, just like over 85 percent of the country currently is.

If you are a health care professional I would strongly urge you to consider subscribing to Dr. Cannell's excellent vitamin D newsletter. The top vitamin D scientists in the world write it, and it is sent to the top scientists in the world with the intention of sparking the important changes that need to occur in the U.S. recommendations. I have learned quite a bit about vitamin D already, but it seems that every issue Dr. Cannel surprises me with new and exciting information about the health benefits of vitamin D.

Related Articles:

Up to 70 Percent of Americans May be Deficient in Vitamin D--Find Out Why You Don't Want to be One of Them

Why You Need to Have Your Vitamin D Level Tested Now

Breakthrough Updates You Need to Know on Vitamin D

Test Values and Treatment for Vitamin D Deficiency

How Much Vitamin D is Too Much? Take This Vitamin D Quiz to Find Out!

RDAs of Vitamin D Far Too Low





Share this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Comment on This Article Community Comments (0)

 
Share this article
Previous Article
Next Article
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.