SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Share this article
Previous Article
Do Environmental Chemicals Harm Humans?
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
March 06 2004 | 3,164 views

Over the past seven decades humans have experienced significant changes in diet, lifestyle and social practices, all of which may have profound effects on human health. According to researchers, environmental and lifestyle factors play a major role in human disease--accounting for perhaps 75 percent of most cancers.

It is suspected that environmental chemicals also play a role in these negative health effects, however researchers attempting to establish a link between environmental chemical exposures and health problems have found it to be a daunting task, as adverse effects may not show up until many years after exposure (for example, in adulthood after fetal exposure).

They suggest that exposure to chemicals may pose the greatest threat to pregnant women, which then may affect the health of the fetus later in life. They recommend that women reduce their use of cosmetics and body creams, which often contain chemicals, and seek to avoid other chemical exposures prior to becoming pregnant to lessen this risk.

Researchers offered the following points in their clinical review of the issue:

  • Synthetic chemicals are pervasive in the environment, but understanding of their potential to cause harm is limited

  • Several recent studies have shown associations between prenatal or postnatal exposure to certain pesticides or phthalates and reproductive disorders in humans

  • Reproductive effects of environmental chemicals in (aquatic) wildlife are well established; these may provide sentinels for human effects, especially on the fetus

  • Recent discoveries raise possibilities of effects of common environmental chemicals on endogenous hormones

The researchers also suggest six key recommendations to reduce the release of chemicals into the environment. These include:

  • All chemicals "of concern" in current use (especially those not safety tested) should be sorted into "categories of concern" according to hazard assessment; the most hazardous to be selected for further investigation

  • Chemicals found in unexpected environmental compartments or at unexpected concentrations, or associated with unusual biological phenomena, should be investigated

  • Where synthetic chemicals are found in raised concentrations in biological fluids such as breast milk and in tissues of humans, marine mammals, or top predators, regulatory steps should be taken to remove them from the market immediately

New legislation should prohibit marketing of any chemical for which basic environmental safety data is not registered

British Medical Journal February 21, 2004;328:447-451 (Free Full-Text Article)


Dr. Mercola''s Comments
Dr. Mercola's Comments:
Follow me on facebook

The health effects of these chemicals will not be completely known for many years to come. In the meantime, they will likely harm many people needlessly. It is just a ridiculous policy to place the burden of proof on the government to prove the chemicals harmful in order for them to be restricted or removed. It should be required that the manufacturers prove that they are safe BEFORE they are even allowed on the market.

For instance, here is a list of the health effects of just one type of chemical, phthalates, a chemical commonly used in plastics. They have been associated with:

  • Declining sperm counts
  • Increase in sexual deformities
  • Increase in testicular cancer
  • Early puberty

Investigators found that oral doses of phthalates in rats had the following effects:

  • Increase in kidney weight in rats (both sexes)
  • Increase in liver weight (males)
  • Decrease in the weight of the ovaries
  • Decrease in body weight gain (males)
  • Decrease in testosterone levels
  • Increase in follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)

The effects of these chemicals on the endocrine system, particularly during pregnancy, breastfeeding and childhood are very disturbing.

It is criminal to wait for further results while people continue to be exposed. The precautionary principle dictates that pregnant women and babies should not be exposed to substances unless they have been shown to be essentially safe.

For more information on this important topic, check out Dr. Rapp’s new book, "Our Toxic World: A Wake Up Call," which expands on this topic in great depth.

Related Articles:

/sites/articles/archive/2001/12/01/immunizations2.aspx

/sites/articles/archive/2001/12/12/breast-milk-part-one.aspx

/sites/articles/archive/2000/10/01/chlorine-part-one.aspx

/sites/articles/archive/2001/03/31/chemicals.aspx

/sites/articles/archive/2000/12/31/cosmetics.aspx

/sites/articles/archive/2001/01/21/chemicals-puberty.aspx





Share this article
Previous Article
Comment on This Article Community Comments (0)

 
Share this article
Previous Article
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.