By
Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.
Dr. Rapin expressed her concern over public opinion when this information
eventually gets out. She says (page 197), they are going to be captured
by the public and we had better make sure that "a) We council
them carefully and b) that we pursue this because of the very important
public health and public implications of the data." "The
stakes are very high ... ," Dr. Johnson adds.
From this how can one conclude anything other than the fact that
at least these scientists were extremely concerned by what was discovered
by this study examining the vaccine safety datalink material? They
were obviously terrified the information would leak out to the public.
Stamped in bold letters at the top of each page of the study were
the words "DO NOT COPY OR RELEASE" and "CONFIDENTIAL."
This is not the wording one would expect on a clinical study of
vaccine safety. Instead, you would expect it on top-secret NSA or
CIA files. Why was this information being secreted?
Vaccine Confidential
The answer is obvious: It might endanger the vaccine program and
indict the federal regulatory agencies for ignoring this danger
for so many years. Our society is littered with millions of children
who have been harmed in one degree or another by this vaccine policy.
In addition, let us not forget the millions of parents who have
had to watch helplessly as their children have been destroyed by
this devastating vaccine program.
Dr. Bernier, on page 198, says, "The negative findings need
to be pinned down and published." Why was he so insistent that
the "negative findings" be published? Because he said,
"Other less responsible parties will treat this as a signal."
By that he means, a signal of a problem with thimerosal-containing
vaccines.
From this, I assume he wants a paper that says only that nothing
was found by the study. As we shall see, he gets his wish.
In addition, on page 198, Dr. Rapin notes that a study in California
found a 300 percent increase in autism following the introduction
of certain vaccines. She quickly attributes this to better physician
recognition. Two things are critical to note at this point.
-
Dr. Rapin makes this assertion or better physician recognition
without any data at all, just her wishful thinking. If someone
pointing out the dangers of vaccines were to do that, she would
scream "junk science."
-
Dr. Weil, on page 207, attacks this reasoning when he says,
"The number of dose-related relationships are linear
and statistically significant. You can play with this all you
want. They are linear. They are statistically significant."
In other words, how can you argue with results that show a strong
dose/response relationship between the dose of mercury and neurodevelopmental
outcomes? The higher the mercury levels in the children, the
greater the number of neurological problems.
He continues by saying that the increase in neurobehavioral problems
is probably real. He tells them that he works in a school system
with special education programs and "I have to say the number
of kids getting help in special education is growing nationally
and state by state at a rate not seen before. So there is some kind
of increase. We can argue about what it is due to." (page 207)
The "Eureka" Moment
Dr. Johnson seems to be impressed by the findings as well. He says
on page 199, "This association leads me to favor a recommendation
that infants up to two-years-old not be immunized with thimerosal
containing vaccines if suitable alternative preparations are available."
Incredibly, he quickly adds, "I do not believe the diagnosis
justified compensation in the Vaccine Compensation Program at this
point." It is interesting to note that one of our experts
in attendance is Dr. Vito Caserta, the Chief Officer for the Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program.
At this point, Dr. Johnson tells the group about his concerns for
his own grandchild. On page 200, he says, "Forgive this personal
comment, but I got called out at 8:00 for an emergency call and
my daughter-in-law delivered a son by c-section. Our first male
in the line of the next generation and I do not want that grandson
to get a Thimerosal containing vaccine until we know better what
is going on. It will probably take a long time. In the meantime,
and I know there are probably implications for this internationally,
but in the meanwhile I think I want that grandson to only be given
Thimerosal-free vaccines."
So, we have a scientist sitting on this panel who will eventually
make policy concerning all of the children in this country, as well
as other countries, who is terrified about his new grandson getting
a thimerosal-containing vaccine, but is not concerned enough about
your children to speak out and try to stop this insanity. He allows
a cover up to take place after this meeting adjourns and remains
silent.
It is also interesting to note, although he feels the answers will
be a long time coming, in the meantime, his grandson will be protected.
Nevertheless, the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy
of Family Practice, AMA, CDC and every other organization will
endorse these vaccines and proclaim them to be safe as spring water,
but Dr. Johnson and some of the others will keep their silence.
>> Continue to Part 5
[Part
1, Part
2 , Part
3, Part
4, Part
5]
