SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
$75,000 Offered For MD to Publicly Drink Vaccine Additives

Jock Doubleday, director of the California non-profit corporation Natural Woman, Natural Man, Inc., has offered $75,000 to the first medical doctor or pharmaceutical company CEO who publicly drinks a mixture of standard vaccine additives.

The additives would be the same as those contained in the vaccines recommended for a 6-year-old according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, and the dose would be body-weight calibrated. It would include, but not be limited to:

  • Thimerosal (a mercury derivative)
  • Ethylene glycol (antifreeze)
  • Phenol (a disinfectant dye)
  • Aluminum
  • Benzethonium chloride (a disinfectant)
  • Formaldehyde (a preservative and disinfectant)

On August 1, 2007, if no one has taken the challenge, the offer will be increased to $90,000 and will increase at a rate of $5,000 per month until someone accepts.

Vaccination Liberation Press Release

Jock Doubleday’s Vaccination Liberation



Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Not surprisingly, this offer has been on the table since 2001, but no one has been willing to take that toxic chemical cocktail -- except for the children who innocently go in for their routine vaccinations. With the average amount of loans for medical students now well in excess of $100,000 you might have thought some doctor would have tried to cash in on this so they could accelerate the payment of their student loans.

In addition to the vaccine additives listed above, others can include ammonium sulfate, amphotericin B, pig blood, rabbit brain, monkey kidney, betapropiolactone, tri(n)butylphosphate, and a laundry list of other chemicals. The mercury-based preservative thimerosal, in particular, is dangerous. Mercury is a poison and potent neurotoxin. Injecting it into a child, whose nervous system is rapidly developing, can have terrible consequences.

From the evidence I have reviewed and my own clinical experience it is clear that mercury is one of the reasons autism skyrocketed in the last 10 years. Autism has started to decrease now that some the vaccines have eliminated mercury, but be wary; many vaccines still do contain thimerosal, no matter what you may have heard.

And even those vaccines without thimerosal still contain an incredible number of dangerous chemicals. When the mercury is removed, it is typically replaced with another toxic additive that is frequently just as health-harming. The aluminum hydroxide used in many vaccines has been linked to symptoms associated with Parkinson's, ALS, and Alzheimer's. Phenols, methanol, isopropyl, and 2-pheoxyethanol are other ingredients which are corrosive or toxic.

The bottom line is, if you are a parent and are considering vaccinating your child, please read up on the potentially devastating side effects of vaccines before doing so. It could mean the difference between life and death.  Avoid the fear mongering and take some time to read ALL sides of the issue, not just the propaganda conventional pediatrician will present to you.  Most educated parents that I know that have done a careful analysis of the data invariably chose not to vaccinate their children.



Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (106)
 
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
This article deserves so much more attention than say Paris Hilton. Imagine if it was on the front of a major newspaper, so many parents who just don't have the info or just don't know would be exposed. They might question their doc a little more before giving in.

 
Coeli
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 6/2006
Coeli  
Replied

ilvsockmonkeys
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2007
ilvsockmonkeys  
 
Posted On Jul 06, 2007
Why has this been so low key? I'm happy to send this article out!


Katy B
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
Katy B  
 
Posted On Jul 06, 2007
This idea deserves world-wide publicity and the resultant lack of takers should be well publicised also.  I think Merck and Squabb CEO's need to be canvassed by a reporter and camera.


Katy B
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
Katy B  
 
Posted On Jul 06, 2007
sockmonkey, just copy and paste or send the url, I opted for copy and paste.

 
 
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
Let's not forget that any bonehead who takes him up on this proposal will still be getting off easier than the 6 year old because of how it gets into the body. The digestive system has "filters" in place, such as bile which can bind to mercury and prevent absorption, hydrochloric acid, 70% of the lymphatic system is wrapped around the small intestine to protect the inside of the body from absorbing toxins,  and most anything we eat goes straight to the liver where toxins are removed. The six year old gets it straight into circulation, without a fully developed blood brain barrier, and quite possibly a weaker immune system. There is no protection coming in by needle through the skin.

 
phooey
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 2/2007
phooey  
Replied

melmac
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2007
melmac  
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
I think you are right. The offer should require that the "pacient" be injected with the mix.


cheftodd
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
cheftodd  
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
good point, it should be a big intermuscular needle, jam it way down in there.


phooey
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
phooey  
 
Posted On Jul 06, 2007
I thoroughly enjoy the way you all think. It almost brought a tear to my eye.


ilvsockmonkeys
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2007
ilvsockmonkeys  
 
Posted On Jul 07, 2007
I'm just wondering if the dose was tinkered to fit with the adult's weight would it matter if it was injected or not. Nothing like a shot of mercury.  Yum.  :) 



ilvsockmonkeys
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2007
ilvsockmonkeys  
 
Posted On Jul 07, 2007
Gammagirl, I'm not arguing drinking a concoction is the best way to get vaccinated.  I think you are correct.  If it were easy to drink instead of getting a shot the companies would do it that way because it would be cheaper :).  

I think the intent of the "dare" is not to get vaccinated.  It is to prove how deadly is the poison in the vaccination.  Doubleday would body-calibrate the dose and it's bottoms up.  That's just my opinion.  I would guess it would be pretty dangerous in itself, even though your body has all these great built in ways to remove toxins.  For example, mercury is in fish (some areas), in teeth fillings, etc.  and it affects people.  I wouldn't want to drink it outright.  No one has accepted the challenge because they know it is dangerous and/or if they believe it is not dangerous the thought of the possibility scares them.  As it should.


Gary_Greenfield
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
Gary_Greenfield  
 
Posted On Jul 19, 2007

Great idea! I'm thinking someone should make a similar offer to someone who will drink a small cocktail of those "harmless" chemical perticides, herbicides and fertilizers that are routinely sprayed on conventional agriculture. Couldn't hurt, right?



ChrisS
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2007
ChrisS  
 
Posted On Jul 20, 2007

Here is a little twist on the whole affair.  Perhaps we could take up a collection for the injectable challenge with all of the adjustments for body weight.  I pledge $1000.00.  Perhaps the media will notice when all of us who have suffered for this criminal scam put our money where our mouth's are and really raise the ante.  Anyone interested can email me at cmstivanello@nac.net .  It is a permutation of my name not a handle as I am somewhat known in my community for spreading the word about these issues and promoting resources such as Dr. Mercola's clinic and site.  This is not an industry or a business for me, just a passion.  Who would like to join?


 
 
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
I sent my local news station an email to see if they would put this out there on the headlines in their healthbeat segment.  I don't think enough doctors know about this let alone the public.  Hopefully a good investigative journalist will probe doctors as to why they wouldn't consider doing it themselves...at least the public should be made more aware of the actual issues. 

Nothing will probably get done; but, I thought I'd throw it out there to them anyway.  I did this once before concerning our South Texas Blood and Tissue Center (regarding not having the charter to do therapeutic phlebotomies for hemochromatosis patients and they did do some digging and have been keeping me updated on the issue).  So, who knows.  I could get somebody who just really wants to stir something up...or not.    

 
A.M.E.
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
A.M.E.  
Replied

cheftodd
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
cheftodd  
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
Maybe we should send it to Rick Perry, see what he does with it?


Coeli
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
Coeli  
 
Posted On Jul 19, 2007

AME, your awesome! That's the kind of motivation our news needs. I think I will do that with my local paper, I live in a very earthy progressive town, so there is a good chance they would be very interested in the story. Thanks for the idea!



Christian Ryan D.O.
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 8/2006
Christian Ryan D.O.  
 
Posted On Jul 20, 2007

A.M.E. I also live in Texas and know the problem the state has put and restrictions they place on some jobs that are not really legal my job tries to force us yearly to get a TB TEST C RYAN DO


 
 
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
I'm unofficially nominating Jock for a Nobel Prize in Medicine for his clear contribution to the health and happiness of the planet, in exposing the OVERT corruption, toxicity, hypocrisy, and criminality of Big Pharma.

This guy, who I've never heard of, is putting his money where his mouth is, in something I believe is LONG overdue, outing the Pharma Executive Suite(s) and have suggested is the ONLY way to stop the crooked approval and regulatory process of dangerous and unneeded drug brands flooding the airwaves and population at a rate that makes the era of tobacco product commercials in the 40's, 50's and 60's look like amateur hour.

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
Replied

Katy B
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
Katy B  
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
This really is putting your money where your mouth is, I want to see what hapens after the person drinks it, I want to see the long term [if there is one] health results.


cheftodd
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
cheftodd  
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
can I add some money to that, and my pink glow in the dark banana!  this needs to be on Springer, or a reality show

 
 
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
This post was deleted because it violated our Terms Of Use :
Submit stories or comments linking to affiliate programs, multi-level marketing schemes, or off-topic content or any other system that will result in your personal financial or commercial gain.

 
organicmum
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 4/2007
organicmum  
Replied

nanciesweb
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
nanciesweb  
 
Posted On Jul 05, 2007
Unfortunately, by law in all states, they HAVE to give the "lecture".  In Indiana, they made us sign a waver saying that they gave us the "info" (a.k.a. "lecture") and we still refused.  It seemed, though, that the pediatrician was all for us not vaccinating.

I hope she's still there when we move back.


KathieJamisonCote
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
KathieJamisonCote  
 
Posted On Jul 09, 2007
Hi nanciesweb - I understand about the "laws being set in place" and they state the "lecture needs to be said" BUT ISN'T ABOUT TIME that bravery and courage take root and these "puppets of pharma" stop reciting what many know to be wrong?

 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.