"Convenience" Foods Don’t Really Save Time
August 23 2007
|
33,384
views
The first academic study tracking the dinner routines of American families unearthed some surprising discoveries. It turns out that “convenience foods” don’t really save you any time in the kitchen, compared to cooking dinner from scratch.
Of the 64 weeknight dinners observed, 70 percent were home-cooked, meaning they were prepared at home, but virtually all of them included some form of packaged convenience food, such as stir-fry mixes, pre-made chicken dishes, frozen vegetables, and canned soup, for example.
Despite these conveniences, dinner wasn’t done much faster. The difference between meals involving more than 50 percent convenience foods, compared to limited use of such items (between 20 to 50 percent), was negligible. Meals still took an average of 52 minutes to prepare.
The only difference seen was the amount of time spent on hands-on preparation, where the use of convenience foods saved an average of 10 to 12 minutes.
Another interesting fact was that only three families worked from cookbooks, and no one referred to food articles from magazines while cooking.
British Food Journal July 2007; 109(7): 531-547
Eurekalert August 7, 2007