SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Growing Number of Parents Use Religion to Avoid Vaccines

Many states are seeing increases in the rate of religious exemptions from vaccinations claimed for kindergarteners, according to a review of states‘ vaccination records and data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted by the Associated Press.

A growing number of parents are claiming religious exemptions to avoid vaccinations for their children because they are skeptical of the shots’ effectiveness or are concerned about potential side effects, including autism.

The number of parents choosing not to vaccinate is still small, as only a few thousand children were not vaccinated, compared with 3.7 million vaccinated, among children who entered kindergarten in 2005.

While all 50 states have immunization requirements, 28 allow parents to opt out for medical or religious reasons. Another 20 states allow parents to opt out for personal or philosophical reasons as well. Mississippi and West Virginia allow parents to opt out for medical reasons only.

In 20 of the 28 states that allow exemptions for medical or religious reasons, religious exemptions have doubled or tripled from 2003 to 2007.

Public health officials say that un-vaccinated children could spread diseases to others or trigger an outbreak that could put the lives of many at risk.

Sources:



Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

More parents are clearly starting to understand that vaccinations are not a miracle cure-all that will keep their children from getting sick. Instead, they are seeing the truth: that vaccines carry the risk of serious side effects, including autism.

Are you surprised that the increase in reported cases of autism has not only slowed, but actually has reversed now that thimerosal, a mercury-based vaccine preservative, has finally been removed from most childhood vaccines? I’m not, and neither are regular readers of this newsletter. I’ve been pointing out the dangers of this vaccine additive since 1999.

The topic of vaccinations is always emotional for both sides of the camp. People who have not done their research are quick to say that it is ignorant to avoid vaccinations. However, this is quite the oxymoron because mothers with college educations and higher incomes are those who are LESS likely to vaccinate their children.

Children whose mothers had less than a high school education were 16 percent more likely to have received vaccinations than toddlers whose mothers had graduated college.

Of course, anyone, regardless of education level or income, is capable of making an educated decision about whether or not to vaccinate their children. But college-educated women are perhaps more likely to have read articles questioning vaccine safety -- or at least to have heard about such controversies.

The trend toward not vaccinating has been growing for some time now. One study found 93 percent of pediatricians and 60 percent of family physicians said at least one parent had refused a vaccine for their child in 2003. Also, 69 percent of the physicians said that the number of concerns from parents had increased significantly.

And rightfully so.

Vaccines given to newborns contain an array of potentially toxic chemicals including:
  • Formaldehyde
  • Aluminum phosphate (toxic and carcinogenic)
  • Antibiotics
  • Phenols (corrosive to skin and toxic)
  • Live viruses and various other components
There is an entire chapter in my book Take Control of Your Health devoted to this very topic, including what you should know before vaccinating, and what to do if you decide not to.

Now, I am not here to tell you what to do regarding your child’s vaccinations, but I do urge you to please do the research for yourself so you can make an informed decision.


Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (48)
 
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2007

If my children were not grown, I would have absolutely NO problem using a religious exemption.  I look at a religious exemption this way:

I believe God created the earth and everything man needs to survive, prevent and cure disease. He did NOT create foods with harmful amounts of toxic chemicals, altered bacteria, viruses etc. I'm not aware of vaccines and hypodermics in the Garden of Eden. Therefore, I can honestly say that my religious beliefs prevent me from getting vaccinated (or my children if they were not already grown). Every time a doctor orders a vaccine be given, he's breaking the Hippocratic oath!!!

My fear is they will soon start enforcing penalties.


 
Patty D
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2007
Patty D  
Replied

david
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 8/2006
david  
 
Posted On Oct 20, 2007
Patty, you said,
"Every time a doctor orders a vaccine be given, he's breaking the Hippocratic oath!!! "......'first do no harm'....
since this applies every time they prescribe a drug which causes adverse health reactions, or slowly kills you, this is quite some problem for medicos and maybe contributes to their high suicide rates and personal drug use, as the realisation of their position dawns?


BeyondOrganic
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
BeyondOrganic  
 
Posted On Oct 22, 2007
Well said Patty D.!!  I would absolutely use a religious exemption if I didn't have the option of using philosophical.  I believe that God gave us a perfect immune system.  Injecting poisons can only damage that perfection!   

 
 
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2007
I want to see Gov. Rick Perry, his entire staff, his ex staff now on the Merck payroll, and the entire Texas State leigslature's kids, grand kids, nieces and nephews innoculated with Merck's Gardisil, before they railroad one single public school kid into having to be injected...

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
Replied

BeyondOrganic
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
BeyondOrganic  
 
Posted On Nov 10, 2007

I 2nd that!!!



EQ
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
EQ  
 
Posted On Nov 12, 2007

3rd!


 
 
 
Posted On Nov 10, 2007

I have a son on the autistic spectrum and with ADHD.  He has had very high levels of metals in his body, has food intolerances, chemical sensitivities, allergies, chronic fungal, bacterial, and viral infections, and possible seizures.  We have chosen to use holistic and biomedical approaches to heal him, and it is definitely helping.  When we first started to learn about how to heal my son, I was shouting to the world about the good news.  Only to find that few people want to hear about what I have learned.

You see, it requires having to re-learn everything you think you know.  You need to challenge what your doctors are telling you.  These are the very people who are supposed to keep you healthy.  It's so easy to just put your health into someone's hands.  Ignorance is bliss.  If you don't know how harmful conventional medicine is, then it is someone else's fault.  Plus, the government is there to protect us - right?

I still talk to anyone who will listen, but I've had to learn that most people are too afraid (and lazy) to do the research and put their health in their own hands.  The biomedical movement (in the autism world) is having a huge impact (especially thanks to Jenny McCarthy).  My fear is that the government and big business will double their efforts to squash the doctors and parents who follow that approach.

If they take away my right to treat my child in a holistic manner, then all progress will be lost.  If enough parents band together, we can make a difference.  Here we are trying to protect our children and provide them with the absolute best health, and we are being ridiculed (and in some cases having our children taken away).  It's such a shame.  What will our country be like in 20-30 years when all of these sick children are in the work force?  With autism rates of 1 in 150, will there be enough able minded men and women to keep this country afloat?  We are all going to pay for this abuse of medical power.

My .02 cents!

Jen


 
jenn_palmer
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 6/2007
jenn_palmer  
Replied

jstarr
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 12/2006
jstarr  
 
Posted On Nov 11, 2007

Jen, if you have time could you please contact me at jwalsh2000@msn.com? My oldest son has ADHD and a not-yet-diagnosed learning disability/processing disorder and I am trying to treat him without meds but it's hard to get access to any non-medicinal support because, as you know, everyone covered by insurance wants to write a prescription and see him in 3 months. I am slowly building an aresenal of references and information but would love to find out more about what other like-minded parents are doing and having success with.

Thanks,

Jen S.


 
 
 
Posted On Nov 10, 2007

I love this quote

"Public health officials say that un-vaccinated children could spread diseases to others or trigger an outbreak that could put the lives of many at risk."

So, answer me this, do these vaccinations work, or not? If they do, how can someone who has taken the vaccine be put at risk by someone who didn't?

Perception beats Reality. Marketing trumps Truth.


 
Dr Rik
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 11/2006
Dr Rik  
 
 
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2007
What I am even more afraid of is the Federal Government will declare the constitution "null and Void", which is even less than a "god damned piece of paper".  We need Ron Paul for president.

Mary

 
mmc88121
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 11/2006
mmc88121  
Replied

katieannpc
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
katieannpc  
 
Posted On Oct 23, 2007
Ron Paul isn't in the mainstream yet......and most people are really not happy with the "front runners" on either side yet. Will Ron Paul run as Independent?? I think he should. He would have a better chance at winning. I can't wait until his message gets into the mainstream.


farac
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2007
farac  
 
Posted On Nov 10, 2007

Mary,

I had written a long reply on why Ron Paul is not right for President, but that is pointless. He's your and much to my dismay Mercola's guy. Libertarianism is a serious business. And Ron Paul scares the hell outta me. Good Luck.



Birdlady
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
Birdlady  
 
Posted On Nov 10, 2007

I am curious to hear why Ron Paul would be horrible as President. Do you not agree with libertarian mindset or do you have another person in mind?


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.