FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
November 24 2007
71,161 Views

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

The U.S. May Have an Oil Reserve 3 Times Larger Than Saudi Arabia's

An underground lakebed in Colorado that spans 17,000 square miles holds at least 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil. This is three times the amount of oil currently sitting in Saudi Arabia’s reserves.

Why hasn’t this oil been snatched up yet? Because it’s not crude oil (the liquid type that’s pumped out of the ground) but oil shale, a type of rock that’s rich in kerogen, a fossil fuel that can be converted into gasoline and diesel.

Royal Dutch Shell has invested nearly 30 years and hundreds of millions of dollars into discovering a process that would make the oil shale usable, and Harold Vinegar, Shell’s chief scientist, says he’s done it.

Using a new technology called In Situ Conversion Process, or ICP, Shell believes it can produce large quantities of oil -- anywhere from 2 million to 5 million barrels a day -- without damaging the local environment.

The oil, Shell says, would sell at around $30 a barrel, as opposed to current prices of nearly $90 a barrel.

The United States goes through close to 21 million barrels of oil a day, and imports about 10 million. So even at its peak levels, Colorado’s oil shale could not support the U.S. population. Still, the idea of being closer to “energy independence” is appealing to many (especially Shell).

Already, Shell has filed 200 oil shale patents and is waiting on approvals from Colorado and the U.S. Department of the Interior to begin commercial production (as over 80 percent of U.S. oil shale is on federally owned land).

The whole idea of drilling into a vast span of the United States’ natural environment, however, is concerning. There is the possibility that the oil could leach into ground water and contaminate drinking water for countless numbers of people.

The process also uses a lot of water to refine the oil and purify the natural gas, and in a region where water is already scare and fights over water break out often, this is a serious issue.

Oil companies are notoriously greedy, and my guess would be that even if Shell begins producing oil for $30 a barrel, that savings will not get passed on to you. The price of gas has shot up beyond $3 per gallon and the oil companies -- not the people who are selling oil to the oil companies -- have record profits.
 
Perhaps the solution is not to fight over the natural resources that are left, but to come up with a renewable fuel source that will be safe for the environment and your health -- such as cars with hybrid engines that run on tiny amounts of water.

Sources:

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 62 )
Comment on this Article
  
  
Russ Bianchi
[ Joined on 09/06 ] [ Posted on November 2, 2007 ]
19 Points        
   
 
Savvy User

What this article is NOT saying, is that Shell's RETORT
(nicknamed 'Bake & Shake') process is highly polluting, to the deep water aquifers, of the ENTIRE Rocky Mountain range.

Drinking waters, where they are drilling, as well as many hundreds of miles from where they are drilling, to recover shale oil, via this injection steam, harsh chemical catalysts & harsh enzymes, adversely effect the water tables, with only getting about a 20% yield out of the shale rock plus sink holes for centuries to come.

Shell hired the former G.W. Bush, US Secretary of the Interior, about a year ago, as an 'insurance policy' to 'steam roll' Federal Bureau of Land Management tract approvals, on this Colorado deal.

The claim that protection areas, around the drilled shale tracts, are really super-cooled with a permafrost barrier, to stop geothermal migration of chemical pollutants in the Bake & Shake pump process (admittedly without having to mine or move rock) is indeed HIGHLY DUBIOUS, & does not account for maintaining said permafrost after Shell, or any oil company, decides to abandon any tract of shale. 

Hence, another EPA Superfund Site is in the making, at taxpayer ruined health, & expense, with massive permanent devastation of underground water aquifers, in another Teapot-Dome Meets Out Of Sight/Out Of Mind.

There is a process that mines shale tracts, in low draft scooping, without harming the air, land, or water, that gets up to 80% yields, of highly quaity oil from shale, at lower cost per barrel(s) than quoted in this article by at least 50% less. 

The Shell Bake & Shake retort method's viable alternative is called THE SMITH PROCESS; from a small independent in Utah, called Syntec.  

But the large oil companies don't want that process to succeed, because increased high quality & lower cost supply, not needing bottle necked and metered monopoly refinery capacity, lowers their massive profit margins.

Uncle Russ

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
Russ Bianchi
[ Joined on 09/06 ]  [ Posted on November 2, 2007]
5 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
POST SCRIPT: Proven and vetted shale oil reserves in the Rocky Mountain region alone, not accounting for other shale tracts in the Dakota and elsewhere could fuels the USA and 100% of all cruse needs for at least the next 25 years and replace 100% of all expensive foreign oil at ONE TENTH the cost per barrel.  The large oil companies don't like that fact getting out either, it tends to hurt their bottom lines...
Mercola
  
AZhiker
[ Joined on 01/07 ]  [ Posted on November 24, 2007]
7 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

I am surprised Shell needs to steamroll BLM as the land management agency hasn't had the money to put gas in their biologist vehicles or hire enough law enforcement, but had dozens of positions available to  process oil and gas exploration permits. (read: 1,000s). Most people on this blog probably haven't been to Wyoming recently to see what used to be clear clean air and wide open spaces is OWNED by Halliburton and is all about getting the oil out asap. Be afraid Colorado, be very afraid. All of this is going to look like nothing when they start pulling the shale oil out. Hunting, fishing, backpacking...  

BTW, if you are in Nevada, California or Arizona, this is affecting your water shed too.

Mercola
  
seajayp
[ Joined on 06/06 ]  [ Posted on November 24, 2007]
4 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

You are RIGHT ON and BIG OIL does NOT want any alternative fuel. Go to:

search.comcast.net/search

and read about a SENSIBLE alternative to BIG OIL

C.J.

Mercola
  
drwolfman
[ Joined on 08/06 ]  [ Posted on November 26, 2007]
       
   
Novice User
  Mercola

The fuel type (gasoline) is not so much the problem as it is the poor design of American car engines.  Of course this poor design is planned so one does not get good gas mileage.  The computer in the car is one of those designs that hinders modifications that will increase mileage. There are some people that have done research and experiments that have increased mileage 2X to 10X with the car engines presently in use.  Anyone interested in increasing mileage of their present car check out the following web sites and learn what to do:  www.preignitioncc.com/wolftech   and   www.brightgreen.us

  
  
ThomasT
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on November 24, 2007 ]
13 Points        
   
 
Apprentice User

Another red herring from big oil. In-car-hydrogen from electrolysis was patented by Garrett in US in1935, Radio pulse produced  hydrogen from watervapour was  up and running in Switzerland in mid 70s, on 300 tractots and trucks. Dismantled by the corrupt govt. the same corrupt goverment who put a gag order on the scientist who was about to expose he carcinogenic properties of the microwave oven. Newmannn`s electric machine, refused a paten for 30 years, Beardons motionless electronic generator patented, but nobody dare manufacture. Captured et tech at area 51, top secret. Somebody from big oil please look usd in the eye and tell us that in an era when  we can send a color TV pic back from planet Mars , we cannot eficiently split a water molecule nor find another so called over-unity effect. Big oil will not allow its trillion dollar dirty business collapsed, much like Big Cancer and their trillion dollare no -cure fraud...

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
tvf
[ Joined on 10/06 ]  [ Posted on November 24, 2007]
       
   
Novice User
  Mercola

It is interesting that when I was back in high school (I'm 68 now) we kids easily produced hydrogen and oxygen from water simply by putting positive and negative electrodes into it and capturing the gas bubbles in test tubes on each side.  All we used was a simple battery.  It is utterly amazing that such an easy process has not been commercially harnessed - perhaps that is what the Garrett patent is all about.

Mercola
  
JulejuleLMT
[ Joined on 04/07 ]  [ Posted on November 25, 2007]
5 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola

HONDA has come up with the FCX Clarity, a fuel cell vehicle that runs on electricity powered by hydrogen, and emits only water vapor and heat into the air. It does not run on gasoline

A number of hydrogen refueling stations can be found in Southern California with others in development. Honda is also working to develop a Home Energy Station that may eventually supply energy to the home while filling up the car right inside the garage.

Way to go my fave car manufacterer!!

*Info taken from Honda website, automobiles.honda.com/fcx-clarity

  
  
mmc88121
[ Joined on 11/06 ] [ Posted on November 2, 2007 ]
10 Points        
   
 
Moderator User
While, I believe we should conserve energy.  I have difficulty believing what the oil companies and the Government tell us.  I would recommend the  book  The Energy Non-Crisis by Lindsey Williams.  He worked in the Alaska Pipeline area as a ministerial consultant to several oil companies, but was not actually employed by any of the companies.

Mary
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
georgeIV
[ Joined on 01/08 ]  [ Posted on January 15, 2008]
       
   
Novice User
  Mercola

You are absolutely CORRECT. In the book The Energy Non-Crisis by Lindsey Williams, he tells us how the U.S. ALREADY has over 200 years of oil on hand. View the documentary here...

video.google.com/googleplayer.swf

  
  
4Hand Healthy
[ Joined on 06/07 ] [ Posted on November 24, 2007 ]
7 Points        
   
 
Apprentice User

Get the bicycles out.. again! Seriously, if we would ALL stay home only ONE day per week, we could cut oil consumption by as much as  15 per cent. THAT would get the attention of the oil companies!!

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
The Dogs of War
[ Joined on 11/07 ]  [ Posted on November 24, 2007]
5 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

in the 1920's Trains, Public Tranist and bicycles, horses and environmentally friendly forms of transport were the norm.

We must adapt, or accept the imminent collapse. In fact we may be about 15 years too late.

George Bush may not be the Anti Christ, but i am sure they have spoken.

Cheers.

google olduvai hypothesis.

Thing Change. Captilsm must also change. We need to find a way to be happier and healthier without working so much and consuming so much. can it be done?

Mercola
  
T_rex
[ Joined on 06/07 ]  [ Posted on November 25, 2007]
8 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

I have take the bicycle so seriously for the past 4 years I have owned no motor vehicle of any kind relying entirely on a bicyle for my transportation needs. I have vowed never again to drive a car that runs on hydrocarbon fuels. Not only do they promote this unquenchable thirst for oil and greed, but they  fill the atmosphere with CO2 causing the ominous climatic changes we've been observing lately.

The way to go, I believe, is electric motors powered by hydrogen cells or some other type of battery not yet invented, that will not contain any toxic chemicals such as lead or cadmium or... is lithium a toxic chemical ?.

Mercola
  
Magnolia
[ Joined on 06/06 ]  [ Posted on November 25, 2007]
1 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola

Very good idea, 4Hand Healthy, but not practical for those of us in service industries where vehicles are used to get us and our equiplment to the clients we serve. I do restrict personal driving considerably and often stop off at the grocery store, bank, post office, etc., on the way to or from a client. Saving fuel should be everyone's concern.

  
  
pisces
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on November 23, 2007 ]
7 Points        
   
 
Novice User

On the radio today, one author relayed that it would take 100,000 years for the planet to reabsorb (in CO2) what we have released in the last 50 years. (Sobering thought)

I've also been a strong proponent of diesel engines and ran across some material suggesting that the PM1 particulates from gasolines were far more pervasive and lung irritating than the PM10 particulates from diesels. This was supposedly because the PM10s, because of their much larger size, could not nestle as deep into the lungs as the PM1s.

Anyway, Europe and England have some 70-90 mpg diesels on the market and none of them are allowed in this country. And you may also notice that with all the fuss over gas prices and with global warming becoming a daily news item, our speed limits have not changed one bit. Those idiots on both sides of the aisle still don't "get it". Our middle class is in the toilet, our manufacturing base has been outsourced to India and wherever, and they're too busy back stabbing each other, trying to get to the center of the stage.

Be careful who you vote for. The most popular candidates are the ones doing the most damage.

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
Karen L
[ Joined on 02/07 ]  [ Posted on November 24, 2007]
3 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

A very good reason to not return any incumbent to office.  Career politicians have ruined this country, despite their party affiliation. There must be something in the water in DC and in the state houses that changes politicians after they have been in office. They no longer represent the people, but themselves and special interests. Return NO incumbents to office, period!

Mercola