FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
January 31 2008
33,705 Views

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

Lipitor Ads Spark Congressional Probe

pfizer, lipitor, statin drugs, expensive drugs, dangerous drugsLipitor has been running a series of ads in which a kindly "doctor," Robert Jarvik, inventor of the artificial heart, tells viewers about the benefits of the cholesterol-lowering medication Lipitor. These ads, and their use of celebrity endorsers such as Jarvik, are now being investigated by Congress for potentially misleading viewers.

In the ads, Dr. Jarvik appears to be giving medical advice, but he has never obtained a license to practice or prescribe medicine.

Critics of the drug industry claim that such ads emotionally manipulate viewers and underemphasize the potential side effects of drugs.

The congressional probe focuses on the Lipitor ads, but will likely examine others, such as actress Sally Field‘s endorsement of the osteoporosis drug Boniva.



Dr. Mercola Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Some 30 years ago, hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol) was an affliction of middle-aged men with cholesterol over 300 plus other risk factors, such as smoking and obesity. Since then, the massive fear about this non-disease has been created largely by the drug companies. 

They have done this while simultaneously manipulating the definition of high cholesterol by controlling the government panels that are responsible for the definitions. This combination has led to absolutely spectacular profits of tens of billions of dollars, as their reward for their effective market manipulation.

By 1984 anyone (male or female) with cholesterol over 200 could receive the dreaded diagnosis and a prescription for pills. Then it was moved down to 180. Today, we’re down to recommended levels of less than 100 and drugs are prescribed to children as young as 10 years old.

This is Absolutely Insane!

I am always amazed by what these companies are able to get away with, but then again, perhaps it's not too surprising when you consider the costly involvement -- both in terms of lives and dollars -- of the U.S. in the Gulf War, which is forcing us into an inflationary recession.

Kind of makes the drug company manipulation resulting in tens of billions of dollars of profit, at the expense of hundreds of thousands of lives by not addressing the real causes, seem relatively insignificant in light of the bigger picture.

To top off the insanity, if you’ve had a heart attack, you get to take cholesterol-lowering medicines even if your cholesterol is already very low -- after all, if you had a heart attack your cholesterol must be “too high” at its current level, according to the prevailing theory.

But does anyone know whether the very low cholesterol levels currently recommended are actually beneficial?

No. In fact, there is no evidence to support their low target numbers, and, what's more, the combination of two or three statin drugs that patients can be prescribed to hit those targets will invariably do far more harm than good in the long run.

Pfizer in Legal Trouble Over Lipitor Again

This isn’t the first time Pfizer is in trouble over their fraudulent claims of what Lipitor can do for you. In 2005 they were sued by healthcare advocates for lying to women and seniors when they claimed Lipitor would reduce their risk of having a heart attack.

The group argued that the drug not only did not work, but that women who took Lipitor ran a 10 percent higher risk of heart attacks than those taking a placebo.

I don’t know the conclusion of that case, but it surely didn’t stop Pfizer from plowing forward with even more absurd claims, which the FDA bought hook line and sinker.

In 2005 Pfizer sold almost $11 billion worth of Lipitor, but after the FDA approved it for reducing stroke and heart attacks risks among diabetics their sales rose to $13 billion in 2006.

This is an unbelievable “oversight” by the FDA, in light of the fact that Lipitor can double the risk of a deadly stroke for diabetics!

Why Statins are Your WORST Option

Statins such as Lipitor are a particularly bad choice for diabetics, but they are a poor treatment even if your only worry is your heart health.

Now, statins do lower LDL (bad) cholesterol very well. The problem is they lower it too well, because cholesterol is still a necessary and natural chemical that your body needs. Cholesterol:

  • Waterproofs your cell walls
  • Helps repair cells
  • Is vital for digesting fats, regulating hormone levels, and neurological function

Despite cholesterol's infamous reputation, having too little of it in your body is as dangerous, if not more so, than too much. Therefore, the result of taking statin drugs can be numerous dangerous side effects, including:

  • Muscle pain and weakness (most likely due to the depletion of Co-Q10)
  • Dizziness and cognitive impairment,
  • Depression
  • Pancreatitis
  • Increased cancer risk
  • Heart failure

The last one is rather counter to the whole supposed point of cholesterol-lowering drugs, don't you think?

And there is this additional evidence that it more than doubles your risk of stroke if you are diabetic, in return for no benefits whatsoever -- unless you enjoy anything on this list; these are the possible consequences of taking statins in strong doses or for a lengthy period of time:

  • Depression of mental acuity
  • Anemia
  • Acidosis
  • Frequent fevers
  • Cataracts

What is Your Underlying Problem, and How Can You Treat THAT?

Make no mistake, Lipitor completely fails to treat the underlying problems causing your high levels of cholesterol. Statins are non-specific inhibitors of a number of very important liver enzymes, including the enzyme that causes your liver to make cholesterol when it is stimulated by high insulin levels.

A far more sensible treatment therefore, is to simply shut down the enzyme that makes cholesterol by reducing your insulin and leptin levels, which is the underlying cause of your high cholesterol. 

By eliminating sugar and most grains, you won’t cause this important enzyme to be blocked, and you also will not block other vital coenzymes such as CoQ10.

This is also exactly what you should be doing if you are diabetic.

To normalize your cholesterol level naturally, and keep your diabetes under control at the same time, these three primary strategies work well 99 percent of the time if properly implemented:

  • Exercise daily
  • Eat a low grain, low sugar diet
  • Take a high quality omega-3 supplement

The omega-3 fats in krill oil or fish oil will influence your HDL cholesterol levels far more safely and effectively than taking a pill -- and for a small fraction of the cost.

I must say I really got a kick out of Robert Jarvik’s public statement where he says in closing:  

“I am a medical scientist specializing in advanced technology to treat heart failure who understands that no one in his or her right mind would want  an artificial heart if it could be avoided with preventive medicine.” 

I didn’t say it was a good kick. 

To infer that statin drugs are somehow related to preventive medicine is again a grossly misleading statement. There is nothing preventive about these drugs; they do not fix any underlying health issues that might cause problems in the future. Instead they raise your risks of other serious health complications that might cost you your life far sooner than your high cholesterol might have.


Related Articles:

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 34 )
Comment on this Article
  
  
Mr.AK
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on January 15, 2008 ]
26 Points        
   
 
Apprentice User
Yeah - the Jarvik ads made me gag, but nowhere near as much as sweet little Sally Fields talking about good she is to her body, and then 'taking care' of it with drugs. Yech! I wanted to throw up. It has to be the most replulsive ad I've ever seen.
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
Casie Girl
[ Joined on 03/07 ]  [ Posted on January 15, 2008]
9 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola
Mr.AK, I completely agree with you.  My opinion of Sally Fields (who I adore as an actress) has completely changed.  I have  lost a lot of respect.  There are many celebrities who "sell out" to big corporations: Brook Shields (Colgate, I think?), Toby Keith (Ford Trucks) to name a few.  It is so sad and disappointing.  People see celebrities endorse something and they think "Oh it must be good!"
Mercola
  
Kissamee
[ Joined on 12/07 ]  [ Posted on January 16, 2008]
7 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola
re: Sally and Boniva, please, it's hard to set apart a time once a week to take a calcium pill?  Then she's taking a $300.00 pill once a month?  Calcium without Vitamin D too I'll bet, no doubt she takes no magnesium either. Science gets a teeny piece of the puzzle and runs with it like they know it all.  They have always been this way, Hippoctates had it right "let your food and drink be your medicine"

Kel
Mercola
  
Sheila C
[ Joined on 12/06 ]  [ Posted on January 19, 2008]
-18 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola
Hi kel, I have never found a calcium supplement that did not have magnesium and vitamin D in it.  What brand of calcium are you talking about?  Is that the kind they use at the hospital?
Mercola
  
Kissamee
[ Joined on 12/07 ]  [ Posted on January 19, 2008]
12 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola
Sheila, have a navel window installed, I see them all the time.

Kel
Mercola
  
Kissamee
[ Joined on 12/07 ]  [ Posted on January 19, 2008]
10 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola
I've seen some of these celebrities in other places, [no script=no clue] I rarely take anything they say as anything but drivel from the mouth of an idiot.

Thank you Sheila for your input, you really have a lot to offer this group.  We appreciate all your wisdom, do stay and be our herald.

Kel
Mercola
  
timmid1
[ Joined on 05/07 ]  [ Posted on January 31, 2008]
3 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

This is very disappointing because it all assumes that high cholesterol is bad.  There is no good evidence to support that idea -- an idea which was sold on faulty research back in the '50s and which is only now being seriously questioned.  Modern research does seems to be showing that the problem mis-diagnosed as high cholesterol is actually a problem with vascular inflammation, and that the body creates cholesterol as a way to treat the inflammation.

Not only are these drugs bad for you, they are prescribed to treat a condition, allegedly high cholesterol, which may not even be unhealthy.

  
  
Patty D
[ Joined on 06/07 ] [ Posted on January 15, 2008 ]
17 Points        
   
 
Savvy User
Unfortunately, because he was awarded his MD degree, I think he can get away with calling himself "doctor" even though he was never licensed because it's still a doctoral degree just like a PhD.  What I'm hoping is that they find because he does have the MD, that he IS giving medical advice without a license and ban the ads.  Much as I like Sally Fields, same thing, ban the ads.  Ideally, ALL direct to consumer ads on TV, in written material, online etc would be banned again.  This is one of the worst things to ever happen to the health of Americans because of constant bombardment with the message that there is a pill for every and anything. 

Even before I turned to natural health, as an RN I was against advertising because I knew that people, always searching for the easy answer, would overlook possible side effects with the attitude "it won't happen to me".  What I've found totally amazing, is, as I've stopped my prescriptions, the information on side-effects I've found on alternative health sites that have NEVER appeared in official publications and explained so much of what was happening to me.
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
T_rex
[ Joined on 06/07 ]  [ Posted on January 31, 2008]
4 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

Having a license to give medical advice means nothing in my book because I consider drug-based medical science to be a complete fraud.

  
  
katieannpc
[ Joined on 02/07 ] [ Posted on January 14, 2008 ]
14 Points        
   
 
Savvy User
Well, well....who would have thought that the inventor of the artificial heart isn't licensed to practiced medicine! Has he ever practiced? Sounds like he's an engineer not a doctor.... I know Sally Fields isn't a Dr. and I really like her - she's a great actress! I was very disappointed to see her endorsing Boniva......

The article goes on to say
 
"But what is the evidence that [the celebrities] actually tried other medicines for treating the same problem at appropriate doses?" asked Dr. Sidney Wolf, the head of the health research group at Public Citizen. "My guess is no. For the average viewer, they would be able to get another drug that is equally effective, and equally safe, at a much lower price."

How many of these celebrities tried diet, exercise and natural remedies? 

One more thing...my husband has skewed colesterol...high LDL & Triglycerides low HDL - well his question is this ..." What is my body doing with it??" We are on a good diet - and getting better, everything that he has tried Gemfrabrozal (i know that's not spelled right) and Omacor - which he is off both now....Gem he was off of a long time ago, Omacor off of within the last year. Even on those meds, the ratios were still backwards from where they "should" be.....so what is his body doing with the colesterol...and what could the consequences be of altering it?? We will be sticking with diet and exercise...no statins for us!
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
foxtroter
[ Joined on 09/06 ]  [ Posted on January 14, 2008]
13 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
1)  Wikipedia says: "Jarvik received his M.D. in 1976 from the University of Utah. He did not complete an internship or residency and has never been licensed to practice medicine."

2)  Have you considered the effects of high levels of cortisol due to lack of proper sleep or sleeping with lights on?  High levels of cortisol results in insulin resistance which can result in your husband's cholesterol results.

3)  The body is storing the "bad fat" on the walls of his arteries.

4)  Triglyceride to HDL should be no greater than 2:1.  Anything greater than this is a pseudo marker for hyperinsulinemia.  I would have fasting level of insulin performed. Your husband's abnormal cholesterol levels might indicate diabetes is on its way.
Mercola
  
Russ Bianchi
[ Joined on 09/06 ]  [ Posted on January 14, 2008]
10 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
Ask yourselves the Occum's Razor question ("Invariably the simplest answer tends to be the correct one"): Do I want to take a drug that destroys the liver, per disclosure in the black box fine print of Lipitor, within 5 to 10 years?

If your answer is YES, then please consider that these slick and highly costly nation TV ads from Pfizer can, and do, employ the BEST make up artists money can buy, and even then, Robert Jarvik's skin (from the liver being killed off) looks pasty, pale, sickly, if not cadaver like.

Lipitor, it's NOT for anyone, anymore.

Want lower YOUR LDL (bad) cholesterol safely and at lower cost with no harmful side effects?  Eat for your metabolic typing, regularly exercise, and consume lots of dark green, fresh, leafy vegetables with regular exposure to sunshine, for starters.
  
  
Bounderball
[ Joined on 01/08 ] [ Posted on January 31, 2008 ]
11 Points        
   
 
Novice User

Doc,

Start by telling you how much I love almost everything you do, and make every patient subscribe to your newsletter.  

This is your website and I expect your flavor throughout, with that said I feel you diminish your impact for the general public by throwing in the reference to the war within an article on Lipitor.  I'm not disagreeing with you but when I print this off and give it to those patients taking unnecessary medications they read the reference to the war and "discount" the info because of the political input in a health article.

 [ Reply ]
  
  
EQ
[ Joined on 03/07 ] [ Posted on January 15, 2008 ]
7 Points        
   
 
Savvy User
While I don't trust this drug, I've got to also say that the lack of a license to practice medicine is not what turns me off.  There are many people out there who aren't licensed by the AMA who'd I'd trust way more than those who are approved by the drug pushers.  But Jarvik isn't one of them.
 [ Reply ]
  
  
Tom White
[ Joined on 12/07 ] [ Posted on January 31, 2008 ]
6 Points        
   
 
Novice User

I am so tired of seeing Jarvik's add. I refused to take Lipitor and then my doctor wanted me to take vytorin (do 2 wrongs make a right?). My numbers were barely outside of the recommended levels.

What I find even more disturbing is that after reading and taking most of the advice Dr. Mercola gives as far as diet an so forth, I am greatly saddened by one paragraph in this article. It seems the good doctor is starting to inject his non medical political views into this argument. I love his sage advice, but prefer to get my political advice elsewhere. The economy and the Gulf War and his political views of it should be saved for another platform. I don't visit this site and get the daily emails for that.

"I am always amazed by what these companies are able to get away with, but then again, perhaps it's not too surprising when you consider the costly involvement -- both in terms of lives and dollars -- of the U.S. in the Gulf War, which is forcing us into an inflationary recession."

 [ Reply ]
  
  
Cherylmcmahon
[ Joined on 12/07 ] [ Posted on January 31, 2008 ]
5 Points        
   
 
Novice User

Just because they endorse a product doesn't mean that they actually take it.

I doubt very much if Jarvik or Fields actually take the drug that they endorse.

I think they are smarter than that.  But money talks obviously

CM

 [ Reply ]
  
  
SilverHair01
[ Joined on 01/08 ] [ Posted on January 15, 2008 ]
5 Points