FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
March 22 2008
Can Greasy Hair Protect Your Lungs?

hair, hair care, personal care products, air pollution, air quality, ozone, ionic filters, ozone generators, chemical reactions, dangerous chemicalsGreasy hair might reduce the amount of ozone you breathe in. When researchers exposed samples of washed and unwashed hair to ozone for 24 hours, they found that the unwashed hair absorbed around seven times as much ozone.

Ground-level ozone can cause respiratory problems, and it has been associated with increased mortality. Having greasy hair could reduce your ozone exposure.

However, unwashed hair samples did produce more secondary-reaction products created from the interaction between ozone and hair oil.



Dr. MercolaDr. Mercola's Comments:

My first thought when reading this article was, “Is there even ONE good reason for clogging up the information highway with this kind of nonsense?”  

Well. Since no one was around to answer me, I decided to do some digging, and will share my findings with all you loyal readers who deserve to know the answer to this pressing question, and perhaps -- at least partially -- restore your faith in the mental faculties of our educated scholars. 

Turns out this research may not be the result of an LSD experiment gone wrong after all.   

(On a side note, if you don’t have much hair, like me, then this is not a big deal. But I will start some investigational ADULT stem cell topical therapy soon, and there is a 90 percent chance I will have a full head of hair in one year -- so at that time I’ll be paying more attention to my hair care. Dr. Phil starts it this week.) 

Personal Care Products and Indoor Air Pollution 

After unearthing some information about the author of this study, Associate Professor of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Glenn C. Morrison, I found that this is merely a small part of a much larger investigation into the physics and chemistry of indoor air pollution -- something that does concern us all, more so than deciding whether or not washing our hair will affect our lifespan to any measurable degree. 

According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), indoor air is up to five times more polluted than outdoor air, on average. So, considering the fact that you spend about 90 percent of your life indoors, the study of indoor pollution is a worthy one. 

Their main aim is to determine what kinds of chemical pollutants are created indoors, and how they accumulate in indoor environments. Related projects include “secondary pollutant emissions in homes,“ and “pollutant transport to indoor surfaces,” for example.  

Morrison states:  

Since proximity to a pollutant source is as important at the source strength, we have begun evaluating pollutant dynamics and chemistry in the region around the human body, specifically the head region.  

“We have learned that ozone flux to human hair is very fast, and that ozone reactions with human sebum will be responsible for lower ozone exposure, but also responsible for higher exposure to oxidation products such as aldehydes and ketones.” 

Aha, here’s where it actually gets interesting, albeit meandering, so stay with me. 

They found that dirty hair absorbs seven times the amount of ozone -- a respiratory irritant -- compared to clean hair.  

This means, when you let your hair go to funk, you inhale one-seventh the amount of ozone as your squeaky clean neighbor (since your hair absorbed more of it). 

But, the ozone level is only lowered because of the chemical reactions that take place with the squalene in your skin, AND while ozone levels are lowered, secondary chemical reactions create yet another nasty byproduct: 4-oxopentanal, which is a different respiratory irritant.  

Are you still with me? 

To recap the finding, grungy hair does NOT necessarily mean healthier air around your head, due to the secondary byproduct being produced, and Glenn Morrison states that this finding, in and of itself, may not mean anything. 

But, in another published study, “Personal reactive clouds: Introducing the concept of near-head chemistry,” co-authored by Morrison, they found that ozone reactions with certain chemicals contained in personal care products can lead to elevated, and potentially harmful levels of ozonides, which rapidly decompose into carbonyl compounds such as aldehydes and ketones.  

In plain English, your personal care products can spell double-trouble for your health.  

First, by being absorbed into your skin -- which I’ve written about before -- and as described here, through the process of chemical reactions with your skin and hair. Hence the reason for this grungy hair study.  

Morrison underscores just how little we know about ozone -- that unstable oxygen molecule (O3) that oxidizes anything it bumps into -- and how we may be exposed to unknown toxins simply because we don’t understand how it reacts with our body chemistry.  

What Health Concerns ARE Implicated by This Study? 

In conclusion, this “nonsensical” study actually points out two important areas of potential health hazards, due to the secondary chemical reactions that occur with ozone. 

First, personal care products that are sprayed or applied to your skin (such as lotions, hair spray and perfume) can cause secondary chemical reactions, causing you to be exposed to high levels of potentially dangerous compounds. 

And second, it also points out yet another reason for avoiding ozone generators and ionic air filters in your home.  

Although ozone generators work for removing odors, killing mold and mildew, it can also kill small animals with enough exposure. And what this research tells us is that there may be many more secondary reactions that we’re just not familiar with yet that can harm your health. 

To wrap this up, I recommend you review the related articles below about BAU Biologie & Ecology for more information on how to improve everything from your indoor air quality, to the health of your entire home.


Related Articles:

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 61 )
Comment on this Article
  
  
PPARGammaGirl
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on March 1, 2008 ]
16 Points        
   
 
Savvy User

Who on earth thinks up these daft studies? And who is silly enough to pay for them? Suggestions for further study:


The protective effect of an umbrella when it rains


The damaging effects of sticking your head in an operational meat grinder


Are blue jelly beans better than red jelly beans in the reduction of greenhouse gases?

The association between giraffe populations and upper arboreal defoliation levels
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
New to Natural
[ Joined on 11/07 ]  [ Posted on March 3, 2008]
4 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
Who's silly enough to pay for them?  The United States Government, which in turn means that "we" are. 
Mercola
  
LadyPam
[ Joined on 02/08 ]  [ Posted on March 20, 2008]
7 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

Anyone doing a PhD has to write an original paper, or (help) work on some original, doctorate-approved research. This means academics keep having to come up with new ideas for a study. Some are paid for by Big Pharma, of course.

I haven't seen it published anywhere, but I'm certain the big boys at the top of Big Food and Big Pharma have commissioned a study that proves that it IS possible to get a camel through the eye of a needle. You just have to put the camel in a blender first.

  
  
Aaltrude
[ Joined on 04/07 ] [ Posted on March 2, 2008 ]
8 Points        
   
 
Savvy User
I agree with GammaGirls comment about this being a daft study but it does also give another example that perhaps we are a bit too obsessed with being "clean" and allowing ourselves to wallow in a bit more dirt may actually be healthy for us.
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
PPARGammaGirl
[ Joined on 06/06 ]  [ Posted on March 2, 2008]
7 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
I don't obsess over being clean - I obsess over whether I pong.
Mercola
  
Aaltrude
[ Joined on 04/07 ]  [ Posted on March 2, 2008]
6 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
GammaGirl, I know what you mean, baking soda works well as a deodorant. I am fortunate in that I am only mixing with other people a few times each week. It means I can time my showers to co-incide with when I am going in to town.
Mercola
  
seg
[ Joined on 11/06 ]  [ Posted on March 3, 2008]
3 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
This study pongs period.....
  
  
HealthDoc
[ Joined on 02/08 ] [ Posted on March 3, 2008 ]
5 Points        
   
 
Novice User
Ozone has been all mixed up by the media!  Ozone is GOOD for us!  ozone is created by lightning, wave action, many functions of nature.  It's purpose is to clean the air.  One of the hydrogens splits off the O3 leaving O2 and goes and combines with something else in the air like dust, or other free radicals which then settles out to the ground.  Greasy hair is dirtier so of course more ozone would combine with the grease and dirt to help clean it up!  Ozone is OK in your lungs too.  Just don't get it too concentrated.  If you're a smoker for instance, the ozone will combine with all the garbage in your brochial tubes and lungs and then your body will need to go to work getting it out thus creating increased "symptoms" which is the cleansing reaction as the body trys to get well by getting rid of toxins.  An "Ozone Action Day" is false terminology!  What they really mean is the ozone is too low to clean the air naturally so we will have a high "SMOG" day (but that's not politcally correct so they say "ozone action day" instead).  That's why the hole in the ozone is a problem.  It allows more toxic stuff into our environment.  If ozone was sooooo bad for us, don't you think they would ban ozone generators that clean the air in our homes and offices?
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
Charisse
[ Joined on 10/07 ]  [ Posted on March 4, 2008]
       
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola
I always though t that neg ions were good for you, the ozone by product when neg ionization takes place is not....Neg ionization does in fact occur with waves, waterfalls, shower, certain weather, etc...ozone is a by product...that 's why high concentrations  of ozone are bad....that's what the new research is finding out, I believe....
Mercola
  
Beccadog
[ Joined on 10/07 ]  [ Posted on March 20, 2008]
1 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

The Environmental Protection Agency during the 1990's did warn the public not to purchase ozonators because it was harmful to health. It was all over their web pages within the US EPA.  

Myriad scientific studies have linked ground-level ozone exposure to a variety of problems, including:

airway irritation, coughing, and pain when taking a deep breath; wheezing and breathing difficulties during exercise or outdoor activities; aggravation of asthma and increased susceptibility to respiratory illnesses like pneumonia and bronchitis; and, permanent lung damage with repeated exposures.

Ground level ozone damages public health and plant life, including that of trees and ecosystems.  For more, see: www.epa.gov/.../health.html

Ozone is only good where it protects the Earth from UV rays. Ground level ozone is dangerous and is caused by the burning of fossil fuels, including coal, oil, gasoline, and even natural gas (which puts formaldehyde into the air)! Manmade ozone is far greater than that made by nature.

www.powerscorecard.org/issue_detail.cfm

Some countries use ozone to purify water and claim it safer than chlorine.  I don't have the details.

Mercola
  
MaxPont
[ Joined on 09/07 ]  [ Posted on March 21, 2008]
4 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

People who read this board should know better than to dismiss things just because the establishment claims that they are dangerous or ineffective. The problem with smog is most likely not the ozone but all the other dangerous gases. It has just been more convenient to blame a natural substance than the exhaust fumes from cars.

Just do a search for “OZONE THERAPY” and you will find an abundance of links about how ozone could be used as a therapy, even intravenously (!)

The theory behind the use of ozone for therapeutic purposes is that all higher cells are aerobic and can survive in an oxygen rich atmosphere. The cell membrane is coated with antioxidants that protect the cell. Lower life forms such a virus, cancer cells and many bacteria are anaerobic and die if exposed to oxygen.

If invaded or damaged, the body creates pro-oxidant free radicals (e.g. hydrogen peroxide) as one of its main defense to kill the invaders. Many conventional cancer therapies are pro-oxidants that use the same mechanism to kill the cancer cells. Ozone is just a very aggressive free radical that will oxidize (“burn”) away dead cells, bacteria, cancer cells and other debris inside the body.

If the normal cells in the body are nourished with antioxidants they will be protected and the ozone therapy will be harmless.

The negative reactions reported by people who are exposed to ozone are caused by side effects from the strong purging reaction inside the body. If a normal (unhealthy) adult is exposed to ozone, the gas will enter the bloodstream and react with debris, dead cells, bacteria, and proto-cancer cells and kill these cells. The result is that the level of dead toxic residues in the bloodstream goes up, which puts the liver and kidneys under a lot of extra strain. The body reacts with fatigue and headache while it is purging the unwanted substances.

  
  
Dekalb
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on March 1, 2008 ]
5 Points        
   
 
Apprentice User
It probably collects dust and other airborn particles as well before you can inhale them. I'm throwing out my shampoo!
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
Aaltrude
[ Joined on 04/07 ]  [ Posted on March 3, 2008]
1 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
I threw out the shampoo long ago because of all the poisons contained in commercial shampoos. I wash my with plain old home made soap. I think it works better than the commercial junk anyway.
Mercola
  
LadyPam
[ Joined on 02/08 ]  [ Posted on March 20, 2008]
       
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

I don't wash my hair more than twice a week but I must admit I've had little success using proper soap. Either it's a bar and it takes half an hour to dissolve enough to actually clean all the hair, or I pre-dissolve it in a bottle to make a gel (as I use for handwashing in the kitchen) and it takes half the bottle. Then of course you need a little lemon juice or vinegar in the final rinse to remove the dulling alkaline effects of the soap.

I used to know a woman who stopped washing her hair. She kept it short and claimed she had 'detoxxed' and 'rehabbed' her hair. After all, animals don't need soap.

Mercola
  
Aaltrude
[ Joined on 04/07 ]  [ Posted on March 20, 2008]