WHITEWASH!

Change
the world, indeed! Gandhi was the racist

pointman who helped amalgamate India in readiness for UN (UNelected)

global governance.

Gandhi
was all for “purity of type”. Think -- eugenics, total DNA

databases, mandatory vaccinations... hmm...

The
Myth of Mahatma Gandhi

Laughter

the best medicine? An old article about

the bulge in Gandhi's loin cloth and his subsequent demise:

Lively, you are ignorant that is all I can say.

This is a mudslinging attempt by BJP and RSS political parties in India.

You are actually believing what someone is writing. Anyone has the right to write anything.

I dont know if you are a fan or Mercola.com or you just come here as a troll.(dont take it personally I am not accusing, I am only reasoning). Because if you really are a fan of mercola then you should know that there are many articles that "badmouth" Dr. Mercola on the internet. Would you believe that?? Not only Dr. Mercola but other health advocists and many others who are fighting for our "freedom".(like Vandana Shiva who is against GM).

I will give you some knowledge. Nathuram Ghodse killed Gandhi. He was RSS member. RSS is a sort of Predeccesor to the BJP party(current opposition in India) The congress party hijacked Gandhis name(indira Gandhi, and now Sonia Gandhi). They are not descendants of Gandhi at all , but many ignorant ppl believe that and that is why they get votes.

Now during the many elections issue raised, the BJP party exposed the Congress Dyansty, i.e. how Nehru(first prime minister of India) was never a freedom fighter and how is father had "contacts" in the British Empire.

The Congress also went back in History and accused the RSS of killing Gandhi.(just like many blame jews or Romans for the death of jesus) BJP tried to defend themselves. Gandhi assasin was a misled and confused man and many believe he was brainwashed to kill Gandhi as Gandhi would have changed this country.(as it was going to the dogs and is still).

When they could not defend themselves they launched a mudslinging campaign against Gandhi. It has been around 20 years since this campaign was launched. Earlier generation(mine and my fathers...I am 31 btw) never believed it. Cause my fathers generation were alive. But many ignorant people in mine generation and current generation believed this lies. Be careful what you believe and dont be misled to hate sucha great man

Absolutely! BE it, don't dream it.

I've been a fan of Mohandas Ghandi ever since I learned about him and his teachings.  However, I'd like to point out that he himself didn't want the title 'Mahatma' (which means great spirit or great soul). Probably because of his humility. We all have something to learn from him.

Perhaps the main article should be given in full.

Quote PART ONE:

GANDHI WAS LOYAL TO IMPERIALISM

By Velu Annamalai, Ph.D.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. might have heard the word of non-violence from Gandhi, but it is certain that Dr. King did not know the true colors of Mr. Gandhi.

From the beginning to the end, M.K. Gandhi was loyal to imperialism. The Western news media and their Indian allies by a massive propaganda exercise created the illusion of sainthood around Gandhi and made people believe that he fought Apartheid in South Africa, and in the process of doing so developed a new method of non-violent struggle called satyagraha.

Nothing is farther from the truth. Gandhi, for the major part of his life, worshipped British imperialism and too often proudly proclaimed himself a lover of the Empire. He was Kipling's Gunga Din in flesh and blood.

To understand Gandhi's politics in South Africa, it is essential to note the three fundamental trends which all along persisted underneath all his activities. They were:

(1) his loyalty to the British Empire,

(2) his apathy with regard to the Indian "lower castes", India's indigenous population, and

(3) his virulent anti-African racism.

Gandhi was once thrown out of a train compartment which was reserved exclusively for the Whites. It was not that Gandhi was fighting on behalf of the local Africans that he broke the rule in getting into a Whites' compartment. No! that was not the reason. Gandhi was so furious that he and his merchant caste Indians (Banias) were treated on par with the local Africans. This is the real reason for his fighting race discrimination in South Africa, and he had absolutely no concern about the pitiable way the Africans were treated by the Whites.

On June 2, 1906 he commented in the Indian Opinion that "Thanks to the Court's decision, only clean Indians (meaning upper caste Hindu Indians) or colored people other than Kaffirs, can now travel in the trains."

Quote, PART TWO:

During the `Kaffir Wars' in South Africa he was a regular Gunga Din, who volunteered to organize a brigade of Indians to put down the Zulu uprising and was decorated himself for valor under fire.

Gandhi said on September 26, 1896 about the African people:

"Ours is one continued struggle sought to be inflicted upon us by the Europeans, who desire to degrade us to the level of the raw Kaffir, whose occupation is hunting and whose sole ambition is to collect a certain number of cattle to buy a wife, and then pass his life in indolence and nakedness."

Again in an editorial on the Natal Municipal Corporation Bill, in the Indian Opinion of March 18, 1905, Gandhi wrote: "Clause 200 makes provision for registration of persons belonging to uncivilized races (meaning the local Africans), resident and employed within the Borough. One can understand the necessity of registration of Kaffirs who will not work, but why should registration be required for indentured Indians...?" Again on September 9, 1905, Gandhi wrote about the local Africans as: "in the majority of cases it compels the native to work for at least a few days a year" (meaning that the locals are lazy).

Nothing could be farther from the truth that Gandhi fought against Apartheid, which many propagandists in later years wanted people to believe. He was all in favor of continuation of White domination and the oppression of Blacks in South Africa.

In the Indian Opinion of March 25, 1905, Gandhi wrote on a Bill regulating firearms: "In the instance of firearms, the Asiatic has been most improperly bracketed with the natives. The British Indian does not need any such restrictions as are imposed by the Bill on the natives regarding the carrying of fire-arms. The prominent race can remain so by preventing the native from arming himself. Is there the slightest vestige of justification for so preventing the British Indians?"

Quote, PART THREE:

Gandhi always advised Indians not to align with other political groups in either colored or African communities. He was strongly opposed to the commingling of races. In the Indian Opinion of September 4, 1904, Gandhi wrote: "Under my suggestion, the Town Council (of Johannesburg) must withdraw the Kaffirs from the Location. About this mixing of the Kaffirs with the Indians, I must confess I feel most strongly. It think it is very unfair to the Indian population, and it is an undue tax on even the proverbial patience of my countrymen."

In the Indian Opinion of September 24, 1903, Gandhi said: "We believe as much in the purity of races as we think they (the Whites) do...by advocating the purity of all races."

Again on December 24, 1903, in the Indian Opinion Gandhi stated that: "so far as British Indians are concerned, such a thing is particularly unknown. If there is one thing which the Indian cherishes more than any other, it is purity of type."

When he was fighting on behalf of Indians, he was not fighting for all the Indians, but only for his rich merchant class upper caste Hindus!

In the Anglo-Boer War of 1899, Gandhi, in spite of his own belief that truth was on the side of the Boers, formed an ambulance unit in support of the British forces. He was very earnest about taking up arms and laying down his life for his beloved Queen. He led his men on to the battlefield and received a War Medal.

Gandhi joined in the orgy of Zulu slaughter when the Bambata Rebellion broke out. One needs to read the entire history of Bambata Rebellion to place Gandhi's nazi war crimes in its proper perspective.

I think it was taken from the book "1984"...  Yes?  What 1984 would be like if the Germans had "won" the war.