SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Why Fish Oil is NOT the Best Omega-3 Source

ecology, fish, farmed fish, omega-3, fish oil, krill oilCallum Roberts, professor of marine conservation at York University, predicts that by 2050 half the world population will have to go without fish; all that will be left for them may be “jellyfish and slime”.

Ninety years of industrial-scale exploitation of fish has led to an ecological meltdown, and whole biological food chains have been destroyed.

North Atlantic fish stocks have been in decline for well over a century. Fish catch records from the 1920’s onwards show that, despite the enormous improvements in technology, catches of the great Atlantic species have remained constant or slowly declined.

Why has the international community failed so badly in its attempts to stop this long-heralded disaster?

“Quite simply,” Roberts says, “agreements and deals brokered by politicians will never be satisfactory. They always look for the short-term fix.” Quotas for fishing fleets are on average 15 to 30 percent higher than those recommended as safe by scientists. And often, for less threatened species, the quotas are set 100 percent higher than the science recommended.


Sources:

Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

The average American diet is seriously deficient in the essential omega 3's, DHA and EPA. Except for certain types of fish, there are very few sources of these vitally important fats.

Unfortunately, as this well-written article in the Guardian spells out quite succinctly, fish supplies around the world are becoming scarcer each year. Even I see it, every year that I go to Maui the fish are becoming far less abundant. And, add to that the fact that much of the fish that is available are grossly contaminated.

Additionally, eating fish before maturity (meaning it has not had time to reproduce) spells disaster for the ecology. Eating fish that is loaded with toxins spells disaster for your health, completely counteracting any of its inherent benefits.

These are both good reasons for limiting your fish intake, and being mindful of the types of fish you do consume.

The World’s Most Perfect Food – Not so Perfect Anymore

The world’s oceans are so polluted with industrial waste that most commercially available fish have become little more than carriers of toxins – especially mercury – which accumulates throughout the fat and tissues of their bodies.

This isn’t surprising, considering some 40 tons of mercury are released in the United States alone, every year, due to burning coal to generate electricity.

The most common contaminants found in fish include:

Smaller fish, such as herring, sardines, and anchovies fare better than larger fish since they don’t have time to accumulate much mercury in their tissues.

The highest concentrations are found in the large carnivorous fish of the ocean, such as:

Tuna

Canned tuna

Sea bass

Oysters (Gulf of Mexico)

Marlin

Halibut

Pike

Walleye

White croaker

Largemouth bass

Shark

Swordfish

GotMercury.org is a good website if you’re curious to see just how high your intake of mercury might be. Not only do they have a handy mercury calculator, but they also perform independent testing on various sources of fish.

You also want to be especially cautious of canned tuna if you’re interested in keeping yourself and your children safe from mercury contamination. Independent testing by the Mercury Policy Project found that the average mercury concentration in canned tuna is far over the EPA’s “safe limits.”

For example, they found that:

  • A 22 pound toddler who eats just 2 ounces of tuna per week may exceed the EPA’s “virtual safe limit” of mercury by 400 percent
  • A 132 pound woman who eats 12 ounces of canned tuna per week could also exceed the EPA’s limit by 400 percent

Farm-Raised Fish is Much like Factory-Farmed Cattle

Contrary to what industry would like you to believe, farmed fish is NOT a healthier option. Not for you, the fish, nor the environment.

Not only do you still have the problem of mercury, but farm-raised fish also has higher levels of PCBs, another poisonous industrial byproduct. Residues in farm-raised fish can be as much as 9 million times the amount found in the water.

See, in order to be profitable, fish farms must raise large quantities of fish in confined areas, and the overcrowding leads to disease and injuries to the fish. The fish are therefore given antibiotics and chemicals for the parasites like sea lice, skin and gill infections and other diseases that commonly affect them.

Making matters worse, these fish are also given drugs and hormones, and sometimes are genetically modified, to accelerate growth and change reproductive behaviors.

Farmed salmon are also given the chemicals canthaxanthin and astaxanthin to turn their flesh pink. Wild salmon eat a diet of shrimp and krill, which contain natural chemicals that make the salmon pink. Farm-raised salmon do not eat a natural diet, so their flesh would be gray if they were not given these additives.

Always remember that the food chain matters. You eat what your food ate. Beef from grass-fed cattle, for example, contains a healthy balance of omega 3 and omega 6 (about 3:1), whereas corn-fed beef from factory farms has the complete opposite composition, containing far more pro-inflammatory omega 6’s than anti-inflammatory omega 3’s (about 20:1!)

So, What’s Your BEST Omega-3 Source?

Unless you have lab results in your hand that verifies the purity of the fish, I recommend you avoid it.

Your safest and most cost effective choice , however, is to take high-quality krill oil on a regular basis.

I used to recommend taking fish oil or cod liver oil (and I still do in some cases), but aside from the problem of overfishing to the point of near extinction and the potential of mercury contamination in the oil, fish oils also have other drawbacks.

Most importantly, fish oil is low in antioxidant content. And, as you increase your intake of omega-3 fats by consuming fish oil, you actually increase your need for even more antioxidant protection.

This happens because fish oil is highly perishable.

You have to have sufficient antioxidants to ensure that the fish oil doesn't oxidize and become rancid inside your body (oxidation leads to the formation of unhealthy free radicals).

This is one of the main reasons I now recommend getting your omega-3 fats from Antarctic krill oil.

It is superior to fish oil because it contains phospholipids, antioxidants ( more than 47 times the levels found in fish oil!), and omega-3’s bonded together in a way that keeps them safe from oxidation, and makes them easily absorbed in your body. So with krill oil, you can ensure that you’re getting these incredibly healthy fats (EPA and DHA) without having to worry about oxidation issues.

Additionally, your risk of getting any mercury contamination is extremely low since krill are so small they don’t have the chance to accumulate toxins before being harvested.

Personally, I now take krill oil every day. I particularly appreciate the fact that the omega-3 is attached to phospholipids that dramatically increase its absorption, especially into brain tissue.

Remember Plant Based Omega-3s Do NOT Work as Well

Plant based omega-3 sources like flax, hemp and chia are high in ALA and are important sources of nutrients as we all need ALA.  However, the key point to remember is that the conversion of ALA to the far more essential EPA and DHA is typically severely impaired by inhibition of delta 6 desaturase.  This is an enzyme that is necessary to produce the longer chain EPA and DHA from ALA.  Elevated insulin levels impair this enzyme and over 80% of the country has elevated insulin levels.  So from that perspective alone it is important to include animal based sources of omega-3 fats.

There are even studies that show ALA from flaxseed can actually increase your risk of cancer.   Personally, I regularly include ALA omega-3 plant based foods, like flax and hemp in my diet, but these are always combined with animal based omega-3 fats.




Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (106)
 
 
Posted On May 27, 2008

For those who are skeptical of our having evolved to need all this fish oil: no, I do not feel we did evolve to need it specifically.  I'm not sure how or why we have evolved the way we have.  Give "The Rosedale Diet" by Dr. Ron Rosedale a read and you might be surprised to hear his thoughts as one of the premier experts in the field of longevity (that we have to "fool" mother nature into giving us a long life because all she really wants is for us to reproduce).  

About the fish oil...I think Dr. Mercola feels that our food sources used to have a better ratio (because cattle used to eat grass rather than bio-engineered grains for instance) and therefore did not require supplementation, but now that much of the food we eat is so grossly out of whack that supplementation becomes necessary.  It is a way to resore the balance, nothing more.  And of course, you could always reduce your omega-6 intake as well.

Again, who knows what we "should" be doing or eating as to take that stance presupposes a purpose for life, something which is highly debatable.  Personally, I feel life is what you make of it.  If you want to gorge yourself and stay alive just long enough to reproduce (emphasizing your simple, animal tendencies toward simple gratification), go for it (but you will make me angry at your wasteful lifestyle).  If you want to emphasize your humanity and work toward the cultivation of understanding, healthy lives and culture, so much the better: welcome!

Mercola, in my mind, retains his integrity, ESPECIALLY BECAUSE he is willing to revise his recommendations.  Science is continually in motion and I appreciate his continual revisions.  Remember, ANYONE can register and post comments here, even those employed by and sympathetic to Big Pharma.  You can't trust any of these comments (even mine ;-)  I read everything with a measure of doubt.  

I do agree with the person who said that this is short-term fix for first world countries.  Does anyone really think there is enough krill oil for the continents of Africa or Asia, much less Europe or the Americas?  Millions of people are just happy to get a bowl of rice three times a day.  The krill aren't responsible for our trashing our own food sources, and it is doubtful we will find the answer lurking in the ocean's depths.  We need to fix the problem, not find some expensive, elitist solution.  Wake up people, the world is in a real mess here and there will come a time when you (or your beloved children or grandchildren) won't have enough money to isolate yourself from it.  Take you heads out of the sand.


 
datdere
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 10/2007
datdere  
Replied

FayeJ
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2007
FayeJ  
 
Posted On May 27, 2008

Very good points made.

Your message has me hurrying to purchase/borrow

Dr. Rosedale's book.

And thank goodness for people like Dr. Mercola to

bring it altogether. After purchasing the Air Cleaner

from this site I realize my chronic bronchitis is improving,

albeit slightly but I agree your take on his courage and ability to be able to revise his statements is a definite plus.

As you say science is always changing matter..

The pharmaceuticals..what can I say..here in Canada

I know many that are actually paranoid about them;

and I would have to say "...for good reason...".



Lori72
Novice User Novice User Joined On 3/2008
Lori72  
 
Posted On May 27, 2008

WOW, you are right on the mark! I agree that we must work to clean up our planet so that naturally healthy food is available to ALL the people, not just the elite! :-)



Hathorhetep
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2006
Hathorhetep  
 
Posted On May 27, 2008

One of my research projects is regarding the development of human civilization, numbering, writing, etc.

The ancient civilizations that still have a worldwide, lasting impact on us culturally, linguistically, scientifically, etc and especially with written records have what in common?

They originate or depend on rivers for water, irrigation, and food.  The food could be fish, shellfish, turtles, etc., but the areas of notable and 'sudden' or rapid growth and emergence utilized water and what lived in it for nutrition.  The oceanic or seaside villages or states would have had those food sources as well as seaweeds/sea vegetables, different varieties of fish, crustaceans, and shellfish.

It makes more sense now to know that Mesopotamia (Tigris & Euphrates), Egypt & Nubia (Nile, Red Sea, and Mediterranean), Harappa (back then, the fortified structure was situated by a now dry branch of the Ravi River), Mohejo Daro on the Indus, Prayag & Benares on the Ganges, Bronze Age China flourished near the Yellow River, etc.  They all had the water necessary for drinking, bathing, cooking, agriculture, animal husbandry, fishing, and manufacturing.  There is ample archaeological evidence of consuming different foods from fresh and salt waters.  I propose that where humans ate fish over time, there was better nutrition overall and better nourishment for brain development.  This is in beginning stages of my research, but i'm sure that there is plenty more information out there for us to find.


 
 
 
Posted On May 13, 2008
One has to wonder how many other factors are involved in the decline in fish population..

How about Dr. John Lee's theory of mass estrogenous compounds that are even making the fish sterile!

Xenoestrogens are proliferating our society and like mercury and other contaminates they end up in the water..

Now whether the effect can be said to affect the worldly gigantic oceans is unknown.. But the problems are found in fresh water..

With the threat of Genetically Engineered fish getting released into the biosphere, there could be a disaster waiting, of inorganic proportions...
 
 


 
jeremy_3
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
jeremy_3  
Replied

Hathorhetep
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2006
Hathorhetep  
 
Posted On May 27, 2008

Excessive estrogens in the environment are mutating and sterilizing frogs and other critters, too.

Like, uh, humans.


 
 
 
Posted On May 14, 2008
It's not just the fisherman....our own submaries press all their metal waste into disks and drop them into the ocean..."don't worry" said the naval officer on the discovery channel, "the ocean disolves this disk in about 6 months, better than in a land fill!"

Oh, Hooray!...and where do they think the metals go????  POOF????
they're dissolved into the water for the fish to ABSORB!!!!

Ocean liners, submarines, not to mention oil rigs and other industries DUMP A LOT! into the oceans......Our governments need to get tougher....WE need to demand more be done...

Just because it dissolves and can't be SEEN as garbage doesn't mean that's it's not impacting the ocean's delicate ecological balance...

Poor Gaia...our poor planet!

 
Charisse
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 10/2007
Charisse  
Replied

Aaltrude
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 4/2007
Aaltrude  
 
Posted On May 14, 2008
And you can add to that the pollution from the fuels these vessels use to propel themselves.


technologist
Novice User Novice User Joined On 5/2008
technologist  
 
Posted On May 15, 2008
let us not forget our pollution that runs from our rivers into the ocean-classic example, the dead zone off the Louisiana coast in the Gulf of Mexico.  
 
this pollution is thanks mostly to the midwestern farmers who are convinced that they need tons of fertilizer and pesticides and need to farm right next to the river, increasing the runoff into the rivers.  Read Silent Spring by Rachel Carson.  Written in the 1960's but still relevant today.

 
 
 
Posted On May 28, 2008

Hello, I am from canada, and I love your site and what your doing for the health movement !

We in canada are facing an incredible threat to our health freedoms that is being introduced thru stealth politics in what is being called the big pharma trojan horse bill,  BILL C-51. Our media has been completely silenced on the issue. This new bill that is being rammed thru will put vitamin C and garlic in the same category as pharmacuticals ! It is estimated that if it goes thru 70 to 75 percent of supplements and herbs will be suddenly illegal and people will face severe punishment and crippling fines for using or selling them without government approval.  When I heard about this I thought it was a joke, our own government would never do that, I mean this is canada !

Please do a bit of googling on BILL C-51, it will blow your mind, it is happening very quickly and we need international help. One of the reasons I am contacting you is because if this bill goes thru in canada, you guys are next.

Big pharma knows it couldn't get away with this in the states, so it is taking out americas little brother (ally) first, to get a strategic geographical and political position. As you read this they are amassing at the border building strength and rest assured if this goes thru, they are going to unleash unholy hell on you from the north. Big pharma has declared all out war on health products in canada. We need to nip this in the bud, please help raise this issue, I think ron paul is aware or definitly should be made aware. We need to join forces to defeat this before they get a chance to get a foothold in north america.

www.dailypaul.com/.../49344


 
scottsear
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 6/2006
scottsear  
Replied

Islander
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 3/2007
Islander  
 
Posted On May 28, 2008

Scottsear is absolutely right and I'm surprised we haven't heard about C-51 here. By the time we do, it may be too late as Canada is trying hard to railroad this bill through despite massive protests. Under this Big Pharma-sponsored bill, parents would be criminals for giving their children herbal supplements. Wake up, use your Google skills and educate yourself - you may be next!



Alexis_203
Novice User Novice User Joined On 11/2007
Alexis_203  
 
Posted On May 29, 2008

I've been reading about your situation.  I'm very sorry for you folks.  It's a shame that our evil American methods of greed have infiltrated other countries. I'm very sorry for this.



sunshine50
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2008
sunshine50  
 
Posted On May 30, 2008

I'm from Canada too and we have protest forms for C-51 which I'm passing out and leaving it at houses.One problem.How many people think suppliments are important enough to protest them?How many doctors will write a prescription for them?But doing something may help.It's a gamble though.


 
 
 
Posted On May 27, 2008

-Since krill are very small, how many does it take to extract the amounts needed for a single dose? Are you willing really to ingest that much (many)? Wouldn't that lead to over harvesting?


 
Replied

Leslie Diane
Novice User Novice User Joined On 5/2008
Leslie Diane  
 
Posted On Jun 04, 2008

Krill are the main diet of the great blue whales. They have to eat huge amounts of this (I forgot the exact amount but it was something like 5 TONS) just to stay alive! I just saw on TV the other day that they are running out of food. All that so that we can have their omega 3?



Robubba
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2008
Robubba  
 
Posted On Jul 23, 2008

Leslie, If they eat so much, then how could we possibly even effect their food supply if a single whale eats more than the entire Mercola site?


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.