SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Some Farmers Now Protected Against Monsanto Lawsuits

farmerFarmers with crops that become contaminated by patented genetically engineered (GE) seeds or pollen have been the target of harassing lawsuits brought by biotech patent holders, especially Monsanto.

But a landmark piece of legislation protecting California's farmers from crippling lawsuits has passed through both legislative houses.

AB 541 enacts protections against lawsuits brought against California farmers who have not been able to prevent the inevitable drift of GE pollen or seed onto their land. The bill also establishes a mandatory crop sampling protocol to prevent biotech companies investigating alleged violations from sampling crops without the explicit permission of the farmers who own the land.

Sources:

Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Imagine being a farmer who is trying to grow organic, non-genetically modified crops. Then imagine those crops being contaminated by a neighbor’s GM crops, whose seeds or pollen have blown over onto your land. Then imagine Monsanto coming in and trying to SUE you for violating the patent they’ve placed on those seeds!

That is outrageous!

Only a desperately evil company like Monsanto would have the unbridled greed to pull something like that. What is most shocking, though, is that Monsanto’s practice of targeting farmers for patent infringement is common, and well planned out.

It is not only the farmers whose crops have been contaminated by Monsanto’s GM seeds that are being investigated, but also farmers accused of saving Monsanto’s patented seeds to use the next year. Never mind that this is the way farmers have operated for generations; saving seeds from one year to the next makes sense financially and environmentally.

Of course Monsanto saw it as a cut in their profits, so they began to patent their seeds.

Since the 1980s, Monsanto has become the world leader in genetic modification of seeds and has won 674 biotechnology patents, more than any other company.

But Monsanto is not only patenting their own GMO seeds. They have also succeeded in slapping patents on a huge number of crop seeds, patenting life forms for the first time -- without a vote of the people or Congress.

Farmers who buy Monsanto’s Roundup Ready seeds are required to sign an agreement promising not to save the seeds or sell them to other farmers (What if the farmer doesn’t sign one? Not to worry, Monsanto has actually admitted to forging farmers’ signatures on technology agreements if they didn’t have one on file).

The end result of the agreements? Farmers must buy new seeds every year, and they must buy them from Monsanto.

Monsanto’s Seed Police

How would Monsanto know if farmers were reusing their seeds? They’ve hired an army of private investigators and agents to do just that. It’s difficult to say exactly how extensive this army of “seed police” actually is today, but as of 2005 Monsanto had 75 employees and a $10 million budget solely to investigate and prosecute farmers for patent infringement.

Let’s just say, for argument’s sake, you were inclined to agree with Monsanto about their right to monitor their seeds. They have, after all, invested millions of dollars into these (typically toxic) genetically modified seeds, and they need to recover some of that money. Well, can anyone rationally say that a farmer is responsible for patent infringement if a seed blows onto his property?

Of course not. And this is where the bill AB 541 will protect California’s farmers from this type of harassment.

I don’t believe for one second, though, that Monsanto has any justification in any of these matters. They are slowly working to take control of the entire food supply, and this is not an exaggeration.

Monsanto is considering using what’s known as terminator technology on a wide-scale basis. These are seeds that have been genetically modified to “self-destruct.” In other words, the seeds (and the forthcoming crops) are sterile, which means farmers must buy them again each year.

This solves their problem of needing “seed police,” but they are obviously looking the other way when it comes to the implications that terminator seeds could have on the world’s food supply: the traits from genetically engineered crops can get passed on to other crops. Once the terminator seeds are released into a region, the trait of seed sterility could be passed to other non-genetically-engineered crops, making most or all of the seeds in the region sterile.

If allowed to continue, every farmer in the world could come to rely on Monsanto for their seed supply … and this is not a company that you want in control of your food supply.

Why GM Crops are a Threat to Your Health

There have been no safety studies conducted that prove GM foods are safe. To the contrary, dicing and splicing the components of your food supply into never-before-introduced combinations has been found to:

Cause cancer 
• Contribute to food allergies
• Possibly cause damage to your immune system
• Create super-viruses

Why are these products still on the market (and in the United States, making up the vast majority -- 75 percent -- of processed foods)? Because there’s money to be made with them, and because it’s difficult to link health problems directly to them, in large part because many of the side effects happen over time.

This is not to say that no links have been made. It’s been proven, for instance, that bacteria in your gut can take up DNA from GM food, that GM peas caused lung damage in mice, and GM potatoes lead to cancer in rats.

Only time will reveal, as Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, points out in this excellent video, the extent of the unforeseen and surprising illnesses caused by GM foods.

How to Protect Your Health, and Support Organic Farmers

First, I urge you to get informed on the issue by watching The Future of Food. This in-depth investigation into the disturbing truth behind genetically modified foods is one of the best documentaries I have ever viewed. It will help you understand the very real threat that ALL future generations face as a result of genetic engineering.

Please do not be shy about forwarding this video to all of your friends and family, as it is something that everyone should see.

Next, support organic (and local) farmers who do not use Monsanto’s GM seeds by boycotting all GM foods. The GMO food guide is an excellent start to doing this, as you can print it out and take it with you to the store so you can avoid GM foods like the plague.


Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (46)
 
 
Posted On Sep 05, 2008
Monsanto should be sued for contaminating the neighboring crops with the gmo pollen and seeds. Monsanto needs to be shut down and gmo should be made illegal. Monsanto is outright criminal.

 
HereIsSomething
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 12/2007
HereIsSomething  
Replied

Marijah
Novice User Novice User Joined On 3/2007
Marijah  
 
Posted On Sep 27, 2008

I would like to see farmers suing Monsanto for polluting their crops! What a switch. Has this ever happened?

I wonder how many crop farmers in this country presently use Monsanto seeds and how many chose not to from the very beginning and how many have quit using their seeds?

Anyone interested in this topic should definitely read F. William Engdahl's book SEEDS OF DESTRUCTION.



Ogre
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
Ogre  
 
Posted On Sep 28, 2008

LOL...  There are plants that are immune to "Roundup".  There are also lots of folks that know how to do site specific gene transplanting.  If I were a terrorist, thats where I would direct my efforts.  The soy problem has told us what they are using to effect their transplant efforts and anyone with a garage and the knowledge can do the same for "weeds".  We have been monitoring the CO2 effect for more than 30 years and found that "weeds" seem to derive the most benefit. A few more immune to "Roundup" won't hurt anyone who avoids Monsanto Soy anyway.



KC
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2007
KC  
 
Posted On Mar 09, 2009

All that matters to them is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$ at any cost to our human life. Greed is the root to all evil.


 
 
 
Posted On Sep 06, 2008
You can get the DVD, The Future of Food, at http://www.thefutureoffood.com  and learn more about the battle farmer's are up against with Monsanto. 

Being a plant person, I have been extremely concerned about GM crops from the moment I heard about them. The most worrisome aspect is that the GM crops can, will, and do cross-pollinate with any plant within the same species. This worries me because when those GM genes spread to our wild plants of the same family/species.

The Irish potato famine happened because unlike in decades and centuries before the farmer's planted dozens of different varieties of potato. Each variety of potato has different qualities (resistance to certain pests, diseases, fungi, climatic changes/variances, etc.) The famine struck because farmer's began planting only a few different varieties. So when the Potato Blight swept across the countryside so went their main food crop leading to disease and starvation.

Today, our diet is primarily based on 4 food crops and those 4 make up 2/3 of our diet. Those 4 crops are: corn, soy, rice and wheat.

Our ancestors had a much more varied diet than we have, and I believe if our diets contained thousands of different natural foods per year it's probably unlikely that we'd have as many modern health issues that we do have.

Hybrid plants/seeds and GM crops/seeds is absolutely ruining the plant diversity that we need in our diets... not to mention the diversity that nature needs to sustain everything from the mycorrhizal fungi (beneficial soil organisms) to providing nutrition to beneficial insects (honey bee's and butterflies specifically). We, the human race, need all the species of the earth we can keep. 

I have many posts on my blog talking about environmental impacts of diversity loss, loss of species in general, etc. I too agree that Monsanto is criminal.

 
Evelyn Vincent
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 1/2008
Evelyn Vincent  
Replied

Don Fletcher
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2008
Don Fletcher  
 
Posted On Apr 02, 2009

Sorry to have to disagree with  a few minor points, but here goes. Potato propagation by vegetative means is not merely use of a small number of varieties. A small number of varieties might still be generating tens of thousands of different sub-varieties by cross pollination, if sexual reproduction were the norm. With whole fields, and whole counties growing not merely the same variety, but all descending in an invariant way from a single plant, if any one plant is susceptible, the whole county is susceptible to a disease.

With GM plants having been generated from a family line, we have a new case of a single variety. But many of the other varieties also descend from the same family line. Even when we have different varieties, we still have line breeding that goes back many generations.

Before we had GM, of course we had developed strains of plants that had come from a small group of plants and then selectively bred to assure they bred true to type. Meaning we had deliberately removed their genetic variability. When the practice of hybridization came along, some people imagined that problems they saw were caused mainly by hybridization, and some were. But the original strains had been developed with no genetic variability. It was this quality that made them totally susceptible to many diseases. Hybridization was reintroducing genetic variability, and so, undoing the mistake of elimination of genetic variability. We do need genetic variability, not in the sense of having more different varieties, but in having the varieties cross pollinate to produce a cross-product.

The very existence of narrowly defined strains is where our problem arises.


 
 
 
Posted On Sep 06, 2008
For those of you who are wondering about who/what Monsanto is and may also be new to the site, I will just mention that Dr M has a mountain of information available on the monster that is Monsanto. Just enter Monsanto into the search bar here on mercola.com and you will see what I mean.

Thanks Dr M!!

 
Mercola Fan
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 11/2006
Mercola Fan  
 
 
 
Posted On Sep 05, 2008
Since a very large percentage of produce comes from California, how many crops, including organic, do you suppose have been contaminated?

 
BeeGirl
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 4/2008
BeeGirl  
Replied

Beccadog
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 10/2007
Beccadog  
 
Posted On Sep 27, 2008

I don't know how many crops have been contaminated, but every state, every country in the world, including Iraq (because Republican Paul Brimmer pushed genetically modified seeds into Iraq as part of the agreement under the Bush-Cheney administration.  

There is no place on earth, where food crops are not being genetically modified.  Even some organic crops have become genetically modified (by cross pollination) and the some laws regulating organic have been changed for big business outside the true organic community.

www.organicconsumers.org/sos.cfm

See also, 09/10/08 - Lawsuit Would Halt Treatment of Raw Almonds with Toxic Fumigant or Steam Heat

www.organicconsumers.org/.../article_14566.cfm

and http://tinyurl.com/4nmxwo


 
 
 
Posted On Sep 27, 2008

You say the Republicans are "bought off" but what makes you think the Dem's won't be/aren't already?

 They're just as greedy and certainly not immune to the tactics used by lobbyists.  

What now?


 
Jen47
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 5/2007
Jen47  
Replied

Don Fletcher
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2008
Don Fletcher  
 
Posted On Apr 02, 2009

Earlier in this thread you will find clear evidence that the Democrats are as much involved with Monsanto as Republicans.

The only significant party still oposing Monsanto appears to be the Greens,


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.