SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Prominent Scientist Warns of HPV Vaccine Dangers

one less, gardasil, cervarix, HPV, human papilloma virus, virus, vaccine, STD, fertility, infertility, sterility, sterilization, population control, abortion, reproductive problems, pregnancy, WHO, world health organizationIndependent health researcher Grace Filby, who won a Churchill Fellowship for her research into phage therapy, is calling on the government for more research into the possible side-effects of the HPV vaccine that is currently being given to teenage girls.

Filby believes that not enough is known about the effects of the vaccine on children with pre-existing medical conditions and weakened immune systems. She says, "We simply do not know whether the vaccine interacts with other medication or medical conditions, and the manufacturers have not studied it yet. This could be a very valid reason why some families and schools might hesitate or opt out."

She has this week written to UK education ministers and health officials calling for urgent small-scale independent studies that would highlight any health problems stemming from vaccinations already carried out.

Sources:

Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

According to the CDC, the human papilloma virus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease in America. More than 6 million women contract it annually, yet cervical cancer claims less than 3,900 women – most of which are due to not getting regular Pap smears. In the U.K., cervical cancer claims a mere 400 lives per year.

Why is your risk of dying from cervical cancer so low?

Because your immune system is usually strong enough to clear up this kind of infection on its own, and does so in more than 90 percent of all cases. The CDC even admits to this fact on their website.

And, as long as you’re getting regular PAP smears, cervical cancer can be caught in its early, and easily treatable, stages.

So, the question begs to be asked: WHY is the HPV vaccine being pushed so vigorously when:

  1. it prevents a type of cancer that is very rare to begin with
  2. it protects against a virus that, 98 percent of the time, is not the cause of cervical cancer
  3. it prevents a type of cancer that can be easily caught and treated by promoting regular gynecological exams
  4. it  offers less protection than what promotion of safe sex practices could accomplish
  5. it is promoted to girls years before becoming sexually active, even though the vaccine may only offer about three years worth of protection 
  6. it prevents just 4 out of more than 100 strains of HPV; all of which your body can clear up on its own in 90 percent of all cases anyway
  7. it has NOT been proven safe. No one knows if it can cause cancer or infertility, for example

And why would the feds go so far as to add Gardasil to the list of vaccinations that all female immigrants ages 11 to 26 MUST get before they can obtain a green card? We’re not dealing with potential import of bubonic plague here…

According to a New England Journal of Medicine study, the use of condoms reduces the incidence of HPV by 70 percent, offering FAR better protection than Gardasil, for example.

The HPV vaccine is a total head-scratcher of a mystery as far as what its ultimate purpose is, because “curing the rampant health disaster of cervical cancer” is certainly NOT it.

And since when do we have to be vaccinated against cancer in order to be let into a country?

Does the HPV Vaccine LITERALLY Mean “One Less”?

Marketing geniuses are known to play on words and create slogans with quirky double meanings, and if you’ve been tracking the concerns raised about the potential hazards of Gardasil and Cervarix, the potential for these HPV vaccines to cause infertility – whether purposely or inadvertently – is being heard with ever increasing frequency.

The federal government's Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has received over 9,000 reports of problems since the vaccine's introduction in 2006, which include at least 28 spontaneous abortions, and 27 deaths.

Is it possible that Gardasil’s cry to fame, ‘One Less’, is turning out to be nothing but a sick, ironic play on words?

Anti-Fertility Vaccines

The World Health Organization (WHO) and its subsidiaries have been actively researching and funding the development of contraceptive / anti-fertility vaccines that prevent full-term pregnancies to take place, for over 20 years. There’s even a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO!

However, no anti-fertility vaccine has ever been placed on the market and promoted as such as of yet.

Instead, as described in a 1993 journal paper published in The British Medical Bulletin, anti-fertility vaccines were being engineered “incorporating tetanus or diphtheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides.”

The authors of this article state,

"The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”

Free tetanus vaccines that were offered to young women of childbearing age for years in countries such as Tanzania, Nigeria, Mexico, and the Philippines, were found to contain human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), which causes spontaneous abortions if the woman becomes pregnant.

While the woman is not technically sterilized, once injected with hCG, she may never be able to carry a child full term thereafter.

HCG-containing anti-fertility vaccines have also been pursued for more than two decades by the Indian National Institute of Immunology, and The Population Council of the Rockefeller University, among others.

In fact, there are no less than 50 research papers detailing research on “contraceptive vaccines” in the PubMed database.

One disturbing paper published in the FASEB Journal in 1993 states:

“… we initiated studies relating to possible mechanisms of action and potential side effects of this vaccine, which should be relevant to world-wide regulation of population growth.”

So again, why the frantic push for the HPV vaccine, created for young, fertile women, when there’s NO solid, rational basis for its use?

Massive Brazilian Vaccination Program Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Plans

A much more recent case of illogical mass vaccinations against a minor health problem is that of the massive, mandatory vaccination program in Brazil, which has raised suspicions among international pro-life activists, who note that the program is similar to other vaccination programs in recent years that have included a hidden sterilizing agent in the vaccines.

The campaign to “annihilate rubella” began in early August this year, mandating rubella vaccinations for all women ages 12 to 49, and 12 to 39 for men; a total of 70 million people, despite the fact that only 17 Brazilian children per year suffer birth defects from the disease.

Adolfo Castañeda of Human Life International notes that just two years ago, researchers found that the rubella vaccine used in a similar campaign in Argentina was laced with human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG).

The suspicion that brought about the investigation [into the rubella vaccine] was caused by the fact that there were very few cases of the disease in Argentina, which didn’t merit a large-scale campaign,” Castañeda said, adding, “The ages for women are the same as those who received the vaccines in Nicaragua, where they included a hormone that sterilizes the woman who receives it, and similar to the age of those who received another sterilizing hormone in the Philippines.”

Polysorbate-80 – One Less Mouse, Researchers Found

Now, let me state clearly that there’s no proof of hCG being present in any of the current HPV vaccines.

I am merely playing devil’s advocate as I examine the similarities between these other irrational vaccination programs in other countries for relatively minor public health concerns -- that turn out to have far more sinister agendas than mere greed – compared to the fervent, irrational push behind the HPV vaccine here in the U.S.

However, Gardasil does contain Polysorbate-80 – a surfactant used in pharmacology to deliver certain drugs or chemical agents across the blood-brain barrier -- which has been linked to infertility in mice.

Researchers Gajdova et.al. found that administration of Polysorbate-80 decreased the weight of the uterus and ovaries, and caused chronic estrogenic stimulation. The ovaries of the mice were also without corpora lutea (a mass of progesterone-secreting endocrine tissue that forms immediately after ovulation) and had degenerative follicles.

So what might the estrogenic effects of Polysorbate-80 be on pre-adolescent girls and pregnant women?

Anti-Fertility Vaccine Ingredient Also Has Clinical Application in Cancer Vaccines…

A potential coincidence I find most disturbing is some of the more recent research detailing the use of hCG, and other molecules, in vaccines against hCG-producing cancers, such as – certain cervical cancers.

One 2005 paper titled, Recent advances in contraceptive vaccine development: a mini-review published in the journal Human Reproduction concludes:

“At the present time, studies are focused on increasing the immunogenicity and efficacy of the birth control vaccine, and examining its clinical applications in various HCG-producing cancers.”

But research published just a few months ago in the journal Molecular Cancer states that the free β-subunit of hCG (hCGβ) – which was originally considered biologically non-functional -- has recently been shown to stimulate tumor growth, and lead to more aggressive tumors that are more resistant to therapy.

Again, I’m mentioning all of this because it just goes to show that pharmaceutical companies have little or no clue of the extent of harm these vaccines might cause, especially long-term. Something believed to be completely non-functional or harmless can turn out to be a MAJOR cause for concern after more thorough investigation.

For example, Gardasil also contains L-histadine, and histamines have been found to increase clot production five-fold when combined with, guess what? Surfactants! (L-histidine can also pass through your placental wall to your fetus.) 

Granted, this laboratory investigative report titled Surfactants Attenuate Gas Embolism-induced Thrombin Production used surfactants like Perftoran, not Polysorbate-80, in their trials, but could Polysorbate-80 have a similar effect?

Could this explain why death from blood clots within hours or days is the MOST COMMON form of death after receiving Gardasil?

The HPV vaccine clearly has a lot of questions left to be answered. And those questions should be answered BEFORE pushing Gardasil on an unsuspecting public at the rate that it’s being done.

Be One Less to Get Gardasil

I think this would be a more appropriate message to send out to young women: There is absolutely no reason to risk the serious side effects of this vaccine to prevent an infection that goes away on its own 90 percent of the time. And there’s no guarantee that you’ll be protected anyway, since you can still get HPV once you’ve had the vaccine. It’s really a no-win situation for those who receive it.

Of course, you can radically reduce your risk of getting HPV in the first place if you follow safe-sex practices, or wait to have sex until you’re in a committed relationship. Then, keep your immune system in tip-top shape, and it will be more than able to shake any HPV virus that comes its way.



Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (105)
 
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

My husband and I also did not vaccinate our kids. They are amazingly healthy. But I followed my intuition that something was wrong with vaccinations. Most mommies, because we are the ones that make the majority of the health decisions, do not listen to their intuition anymore. They just routinely vaccinate because they are told to do so. It is so scarey to me. And now to vaccinate young girls/women against this "made-up" disease/problem. Because they are told to do so. Does anyone think for themselves anymore? That is why I am so grateful for this website. I can truly state my beliefs without feeling like I am the only one who believes in true health.

The health care system... What a joke. If you truly want to be healthy you have to do it for yourself. I really don't want doctors telling me about myself anymore. I'll take my kids once a year for a check-up so I don't look like a bad mommy for never going to the doctor otherwise they would never go. They are incredibly healthy and we also live a healthy lifestyle. They are learning about being responsible for their health/behavior already at 7 and 9 years old.

Thank you everybody for your honesty in sharing all your stories. It makes a big difference to someone like me who has felt a bit alone in her theories and health practices. Continue to take good care!!!


 
Mama2boys
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 8/2008
Mama2boys  
Replied

gladtidings4all
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
gladtidings4all  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

I believe like you 100%, people do not listen to their intuition any more they

are so misled and easily urged by these paid doctors from their business partner the pharmaceuticals! I only go to the doctors when I can't take care of the problem myself!. And even then I am weary of them! Natural home remedies and natural health foods is the cure!



BeyondOrganic
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
BeyondOrganic  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

I wish you lived by me!!  You are sooo not alone.  I often feel the same way though.



curious7
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
curious7  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

Mama2Boys:

Just hang in there, because of a truth, this is what it is all about, being a parent and making decisions about your own health care and that of your children.  Truly I wish there were more like you, people who have enough sense to take no ones word as absolute truth, and especially about something as important as yours, and your family's health.

It is not Rocket Science, good health, first and formost we need to know the basics, and move on from there.  This I believe is the reason why there is no more basic health classes in our schools, and why physical fitness is also seen as unnecessary.  And the plot thickens.



All Under Heaven
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 2/2008
All Under Heaven  
 
Posted On Oct 26, 2008

I agree. People don't listen to their intuition anymore. Gavin De Becker wrote a book on it, called the Gift of Fear in victimizing situations where trusting intuition can save your life or a loved one. He appeared on Oprah once too.

Thanks Dr. M.



springolife
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 2/2008
springolife  
 
Posted On Oct 27, 2008

I DO think that birth control is a possible side effect of this vaccine!!

My mom's reason I should vaccinate: fear that CPS will tell a judge I'm harming my children by not vaccinating and have them taken away!  Definitely not a good enough reason, I do not vaccinate out of fear of the government.  I vaccinated my first 3 without a true concern that I should not (with the exception of vaccinating newborns, I was not about to allow that.) My second an third child had the typical autism regression after their 12 month shots, yet still I vaccinated.  

But when my fourth was born I felt very unsettled about vaccinations.  I felt in my 'gut' that it was not safe for her.  I wish I had listened to that because she was terribly sick for 6-8 weeks following each series of vaccines.  She was breastfed, at home, with no siblings in school or daycare or church nurseries.  Yes she was terribly ill (fever, high pitched cries, weird rashes, boils in her throat...) and when it came time for her 6 month vaccines I didn't want to do them.  I talked them into 'letting' me have half of them (it was still against 8 diseases) and do the other half in one month.  Again, she was sick for 6-8 weeks and I haven't taken her back for the rest!  She is 18 months and has been very healthy ever since stopping the assault on her immune system.  I am pregnant with #4 and will not be vaccinating him for at least the first two years.  


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 03, 2008
This Gardasil makes my blood boil.

I've just read today that it's now required for female 11-26 year old immigrants applying for a green card. Which its cost will add to the burden of existing fees they have to pay .  A Merck spokeswoman (*picture me in a derisive, slightly mocking tone, and sarcastically gesturing my hand I were elaborating this to your face*) said they played no part in the decision and didn't know about it. Either way, like I've been saying all along, they can't be trusted.

 Did I not predict correctly to all of you? If they can't push it here, they'll peddle it elsewhere and find a new market. Like what they're doing now.

But now I want to talk about something different. I've been waiting to do so.

So this " Gardasil-covert mass sterilization campaign" theory? "Population control"? I hate to admit it, but part of me thinks it's a crazy  conspiracy theory. But I'm also willing to believe it (with everything I've seen/heard happening). A Naturopath and Iridologist, Michael Blake, once examined the irises of several girls who got Gardasil and all were virgins. He found damage in the area that corresponds to the uterus. Tissue damage, and also residue of the drug. Such damage (which can happen in women who have had an abortion or other uterine abnormalities) can prevent an embryo from holding onto the uterine wall.

Looking back in the 80s, they had a mass vaccination campaign in the Phillippines. The tetanus vaccine was given only to women, and caused sterility. Research for the HPV vaccine began in the 80s also. Or how about the shots sent to Africa? Or DES and Thalidomide? They said those were good for women too. 

So far for me? I'm leaning towards the part where I'm believing it. Maybe in the next few years if teenage pregnancy declines significantly, it won't be a coincidence. A silent alarm no one can hear until it's too late.

 
All Under Heaven
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 2/2008
All Under Heaven  
Replied

DinaM
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
DinaM  
 
Posted On Oct 04, 2008
I have often thought the same thing myself.  I would not be at all surprised if we find out years from now that Gardasil has made most of the women who have received it sterile.  After all, if you want to limit population growth, you have to either eliminate or sterilize the vast majority of females, since a single male could, at least in theory, impregnate hundreds of females. 

I do not think that this line of reasoning is the least bit illogical, especially given the fact that its stated purpose, to prevent cervical cancer, is so lame.  Even the authorities admit that it only "protects" against 4 out of 100 strains of HPV, and that it is completely ineffective in cases where a woman has already been infected with one of the 4 covered strains.  Since the risks are so high, and the potential benefit so low, there has to be another explanation for why they are pushing this off onto all women of childbearing age, and girls coming into childbearing age.  I think the following might very well be the real reason:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones 

See especially rule number one:  MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000  IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE




All Under Heaven
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 2/2008
All Under Heaven  
 
Posted On Oct 04, 2008
Ever seen the movie Children of Men? It came out in 2006, same year as Gardasil actually (just wanted to point that out).

Maybe Hollywood tried to warn everyone with all the movies about dystopian futures.

A few thousand years ago, fertility was worshipped to be able to propagate the race. Now it's being attacked from all sides.


monsanto is satanic
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2008
monsanto is satanic  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

You are very right in these statements. I just heard about this satanic immigration policy the other day as well. It's better for them to not even come to this piece of crap country. Or should I say the united states of satan. This country has lost it way big time.



curious7
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
curious7  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

Check out the movie "The Constant Gardner," it has a great deal to say about drug testing.



themikeb
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 2/2007
themikeb  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

How can everything from fluoride( also a sterilizing agent) to mercury,AIDS in hepatitis shots in the 80's, GMO's ,countless poisons as food additives NOT BE part of Population reduction? What else can this be interpreted as?

How bad does it have to get before people will see?

Do people honestly think ,that they make just simple 'mistakes' all the time, simple errors in judgement, over and over.

All coincidences??? Let history of man kind be a lesson here!



lepus
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2008
lepus  
 
Posted On Oct 27, 2008

I agree.  When I heard about this vaccine, my gut feeling (immediately) without any previous info, was that this vaccine (whether purposeful or not) was going to cause mass sterility.  That movie "Children of Man" came to mind.  This young generation of girls who are being vaccinated will find in 15 to 20 years from now that they are unable to conceive.  

On the other hand, I do feel that the earth is far beyond a safe sized human population (given I think we are like cockroaches, but unlike roaches, we are killing this gorgeous planet).  I do not think however, that gov't should be sneaking or even accidentally causing (thru vaccination) mass sterility.  People should be EDUCATED on the dangers to the planet of overpopulation of our species, and people should make their own informed choices to limit their family sizes or decide for themselves not to have children or to adopt instead.  If the idea of making girls sterile is purposeful by the gov't and vaccine co's, I think this "back door" approach is reprehensible.  Sounds like a fascist state to me.....


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 05, 2008
I agree 100%!  This is one reason that my husband and I do NOT vaccinate our kids!  We have a 3 1/2yr old, 2 1/2 yr old, 9 mo old and baby #4 is due Jan 09.  We have received a ton of ridicule from many people including a Dr. who said he was turning us over to child services.  I stand by our decision and my kids are hardly ever sick.  My 1st son has had 1 ear infection in his 3 1/2 yrs and neither of my other 2 have had any.  They get a cold every once in a while but so do vaccinated children.  I will protect my kids with everything I have in me and what I can't is left to God!

 
jenglade321
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 10/2008
jenglade321  
Replied

gladtidings4all
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
gladtidings4all  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

Good for you! I never vaccinated my son either he's 19 years old now and never had the measles or chicken pox, or even bronchitis, or anything he was very healthy child due to that I changed his baby milk to soy milk. I claimed religious beliefs and never had a problem with vaccines or school! So stand up for your children!



milamaya
Novice User Novice User Joined On 7/2008
milamaya  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

Jeanglade, You are a good mom. Vaccinating children is the same as NOT really loving them. I really can't believe when I hear a parent say "I don't want to vaccinate but I do anyways because they won't accept my child at school"...HOMESCHOOL!!!! I will not vaccinate my kids either.



northernherbalist
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2008
northernherbalist  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

Stick to your guns (so to speak).  My kids are grown now, but I was harassed by Child "Protective Services" in the 80's for not vaccinating and for home-schooling.  After calling a lawyer, who gave me great advice FOR FREE of all things, he said they work through intimidation, not because the law is on their side.  You have rights.  Find out what they are and exercize them.  Good luck!



kimkc
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
kimkc  
 
Posted On Oct 26, 2008

I have learned the hard way.  DO NOT VACCINATE KIDS OR ADULTS!  My 4th daughter is recovering from horrible regressive autism with the DAN biomedical program including a GFCF nearly soy-free diet plus a wonderful special education teacher (working on her PhD in behavioral science) who admitted to the entire staff in my daughter's IEP meeting that autism is environmentally induced through toxins in our environment!!!  Gotta love this lady...my daughter is thriving in her 1/2 day special education classroom that focuses on speech & social skills then mainstreamed in regular 1/2 day kindergarten with her  academic skills above many of the regular ed students.  She is "athletically" gifted and teachers/psychologist think she is "above the gifted level" in IQ!  They wouldn't see this is we didn't change her diet, add supplements and remove mercury, lead and aluminum with chelation therapy (amazing!).  My daughter's prenatal flu shot, MMR & Varicella on the same day (hyperactivity set in), flu shot at 20 months, and weaning her to dairy (cerebral allergy symptoms from casein during regression) at 13 months...set the ball rolling into regressive autism at 25-26 months.  No one else in our family history has had this happen to them.  The amount of families admitting to me that their child probably has high functioning autism or Asperger's when they are labeled with ADD and drugged is darn scary.   The amount of kids that have ASD symptoms like combinations of sensory issues, learning difficulties, eye focus issues, sound modulation & overstimulation problems, behavioral problems and attention span difficulties is mind-boggling to me. I don't know how many girls have skipped or stopped future Gardisil shots because I sent their parents the Gardisil information from Dr. Mercola's website.  We have to keep sharing these articles and stand our ground with what we know is the truth!  Good luck!  


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

My daughter turned three yesterday and, I'm proud to say that, as far as an HPV vaccine is concerned, my daughter will and will always be "one less". One less girl to recieve this vaccine, one less girl to suffer from it. As a registerd nurse, I have researched this vaccine extensively and have found it to be nothing more than a travesty to our younger generation. If you are interested in this subject, please visit...

www.judicialwatch.org/.../JWReportFDAhpvVaccineRecords.pdf


 
CardioRN
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 10/2008
CardioRN  
Replied

milamaya
Novice User Novice User Joined On 7/2008
milamaya  
 
Posted On Jan 24, 2009

Cardio RN, it is nice to hear a nurse talk like this when it seems most doctors and nurses are confabulated to destroy people's health with all the nasty vaccines out there.


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

This just makes me sick to hear what is being done to compromise the delicate health of our young and vulnerable children! This is yet another prime example of how society is slowly, but effectively, being over taken by extremely corrupt, evil entities. It is no longer just a myth that this world is being run by sick and evil individuals at the top of the money chain, ( Check out Rockefeller and his cronies. Apparently these same individuals perform satanic rituals on a regular basis too.), that are using their influences, (money, and lots of it!), to bring on a New World Government with "Big Brother" in full control. This is no longer a well kept secret as there is enough information present to back this up if anyone dares to look for it.

What I really don't understand is why doctors and other conventional health care providers can't think for themselves on this. Surely the must have enough education and a certain degree of intelligence to reason with the facts that are so blatantly obvious. Why do so many of them still insist that vaccinations are good and stand behind this corrupt system?! Is it that they are so brainwashed by the pharmaceutical companies that, despite all the credible scientific evidence, they fail to see any reason in independent studies performed by real, genuine doctors and scientists?

Thanks for the article. Hopefully many more people will realize the real reason behind this atrocity and other FDA approved programs.

Stay informed and guard your good health while you still can!


 
ImJustHealthConscious
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 7/2008
ImJustHealthConscious  
Replied

curious7
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
curious7  
 
Posted On Oct 25, 2008

ImJustHealthConscious:

The Rockefeller Family owns the controlling interests in each and every drug manfacturing company.  They also decide how and what health care will be in this nation, and eventually worldwide.  See www.apfn.org  



ImJustHealthConscious
Novice User Novice User Joined On 7/2008
ImJustHealthConscious  
 
Posted On Oct 26, 2008

curious7

Thanks for the info. and the link. I will check it out.


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.