SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
The Food Industry Challenges That Obama Needs to Address


President-elect Obama’s choice for Secretary of Agriculture could be perhaps the most important clue as to whether Obama really intends to bring change to Washington. It will determine whether or not he plans to take on one of the most powerful lobbies in the country, the businessmen who turned agriculture into agribusiness.

Current farm policy was called by Time magazine, "a welfare program for the megafarms that use the most fuel, water and pesticides; emit the most greenhouse gases; grow the most fattening crops; hire the most illegals; and depopulate rural America."

An online movement has sprung up calling on President-elect Obama to name anti-agribusiness crusader Michael Pollan Secretary of Agriculture. Pollan's popular books include The Omnivore's Dilemma and In Defense of Food.

In this fascinating interview, Bill Moyers asked Michael Pollan what would happen if he was named Secretary of Agriculture instead of yet one more advocate of industrial farming.


Sources:

Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

In this fascinating PBS interview with Bill Moyer, Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food, and The Omnivore's Dilemma , talks about what he believes President-elect Obama needs to do to repair the American food system, based on his article "An Open Letter to the Farmer in Chief," recently published in The New York Times.

(A full transcript of the interview is available here if you have trouble viewing the video.)

And, in case you didn’t already know this, Pollan also penned the brilliant New York Times article about the perils of factory-farmed beef back in 2002. Both his articles and books are well worth reading if you haven’t already done so.

What’s Wrong with the American Food System?

Like Pollan, I believe many of our society’s chronic health problems could be resolved if attention was paid, at the highest levels of government, to the root problem –our agricultural subsidies. In fact, Pollan suggests a “Food Czar” at the White House rather than a Secretary of Agriculture, as the Department of Agriculture is so deeply entrenched with the agri-business.

As has been recently disclosed by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), between 2003 and 2006, millionaire farmers received $49 million in crop subsidies, even though they earned more than the $2.5 million cutoff for such subsidies. In a recent speech, President-elect Obama stated that this was a prime example of the kind of waste he intends to end once he takes office.

Time will tell if he has the clout to make that happen. Because as Michael Pollan points out, these are very powerful forces to contend with; the agriculture lobby is more powerful than even the pharmaceutical industry!

A previous article in The New York Times, published April 24, 2008, highlights the disastrous politics of our current farm bill, and the ostrich-like behavior of our U.S. government officials. 

And as another glaring example of how broken the system is, between 2000 and 2006, the U.S. federal government paid at least $1.3 billion in “direct payment” subsidies for rice and other crops to people who did no farming, according to The Washington Post. 

I’m not sure what’s worse: paying for crops that contribute to declining public health and rising health care costs, or paying for non-existent crops…

Either way, one thing is for sure. These subsidies impact how we produce our food, which impacts disease rates, which in turn drive health care costs into the stratosphere.

As Pollan explains here, our food policy reaches VERY deep into our everyday lives – from the rise of diabetes all the way to our national security. Unless the food policy is addressed and corrected, little progress will be made to improve the current health care crisis, increase our energy independence, and reduce the negative impact on our environment and climate.

“The way we currently grow, process, and eat food in America goes to the heart of all three problems and will have to change if we hope to solve them,” he says.

Our Government is Subsidizing Fast Food

The food crops currently subsidized are corn, wheat, soy and rice. Growing little else but corn and soy means we end up with a fast food diet. In essence, these commodity programs are subsidies for the creation of junk and fast food, not REAL food that could have a positive impact on public health.

The average American is now 10 pounds overweight, which translates into $250 billion in added yearly health care costs, not to mention a shorter lifespan.

But in addition to producing little else but fast food, this type of monoculture is also very dependent on fossil fuels.

As Pollan states, we’re actually eating oil – we just don’t know it. Because when you grow one type of crop almost exclusively, you deplete the soil, which means you have to use more fertilizer, which is made from fossil fuel. Monocultures also invite more pests, which need to be treated with ever increasing amounts of pesticides – also made from fossil fuel. 

Cheap food is actually incredibly expensive once everything is added up, including stratospheric health care costs, continued dependence on fossil fuels, and the destruction of the earth as a whole.

Pollan says:

“Food is the shadow issue over all [those] other issues. You're only going to get so far with healthcare costs unless you look at the diet.

Let's look at the school lunch program. This is where we're feeding a big part of our population. We are essentially feeding them fast food and teaching them how to eat it quickly. If we could spend a dollar or more per day per child and work on the nutritional quality of that food – and require that a certain percentage of that school lunch fund in every school district has to be spent within 100 miles to revive local agriculture, to create more jobs on farms, to rural redevelopment – you will achieve a great many goals through doing that.

You will have a healthier population of kids who will perform better in the afternoon after that lunch. You will have the shot in the arm to local economies through helping local agriculture. And you will teach this generation habits that will last a lifetime about eating.”

Remember That YOU are Still in Charge of What Your Family Eats!

Industrial agriculture lobbyists wield incredible power in Congress. However, they cannot dictate where you choose to buy food for your family. So please do your health a favor and support the small family farms in your area. You’ll receive nutritious food from a source that you can trust, and you’ll be supporting the honest work of a real family farm.

It all boils down to this: if you want to optimize your health, you must return to the basics of healthy food choices.

The problem is, there is so much confusion about what is healthy – and in some cases, whether or not something is actually food -- and as Pollan describes, one of the reasons is due to the obsessive focus on individual ingredients or nutrients rather than the food as a whole.

So let’s clarify.

The simplest way back toward health is to focus on WHOLE foods; foods that have not been processed or altered from their original state. Food that has been grown or raised as nature intended, without the use of chemical additives, pesticides and fertilizers.

It’s as simple as that!

Speed is of paramount importance to most people. Fast food and processed food products are the norm for most working people simply because of its ease and speed. Likewise, most people want to change their health status, or their weight, quickly. Hence the plethora of drugs and processed foods that promise to do just that.

Well, folks, here’s a thought for you to chew on; the FASTEST way to optimal health is through choosing a diet made up of whole foods. And, making your food selections based on your nutritional type can speed up your progress even further.

So if you’re REALLY interested in speeding up your recovery from disease, losing weight and increasing your overall health quickly, putting your daily diet front and center is akin to zipping down an empty expressway, compared to toiling through a traffic jam, because whole foods give you MORE than the sum of their individual nutrients.

Whole, organic foods contain so many other things that work together synergistically, making them superior to anything that contains only the active ingredient (and frequently as a synthetic version at that).

That’s also one of the reasons why I do not emphasize using supplements in my health recommendations. There is a danger in getting too hung up on particular nutrients because you’re increasing the likelihood that you’ll miss your mark. 

There are some exceptions, such as omega-3, due to most fish being dangerously high in toxins these days, and vitamin D3, if you’re unable to get sufficient amounts of sun exposure throughout the year. But in general, most of your essential nutrients are available in organic, whole foods.

Eating a diet of processed foods while popping vitamins and supplements, thinking you’re getting everything you need for health, is a reckless miscalculation that will extract its true cost in the form of chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease and cancer.

Any amount of time and money you save today by stopping at a fast food restaurant, you’re bound to repay later when you’re too ill to lead an active life.

Voice Your Opinion on Selection of Next Secretary of Agriculture

Although Bill Moyer plays around with the idea of Michael Pollan taking the helm as the next Secretary of Agriculture, that is not going to happen. Instead, President-elect Obama has chosen former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack to spearhead the department. The Organic Consumers Association has put together a petition to block the confirmation of Vilsack, as the former Governor's track record offers a less than promising glimpse of what may lie in store for our future, if he takes office.

Over the past month, Organic Consumers Association members have emailed more than 20,000 letters to President-Elect Obama¹s Transition Team, calling for the appointment of a Secretary of Agriculture who would develop and implement a plan that promotes family-scale farming, a safe and nutritious food system with a sustainable and organic vision for the future.

Tom Vilsack¹s business as usual positions, on the other hand, include the following:

  • Vilsack has been a strong supporter of genetically engineered crops,
    including bio-pharmaceutical corn.
  • The biggest biotechnology industry group, the Biotechnology Industry
    Organization, named Vilsack Governor of the Year. He was also the founder
    and former chair of the Governor's Biotechnology Partnership.
  • When Vilsack created the Iowa Values Fund, his first poster child of
    economic development potential was Trans Ova and their pursuit of cloning
    dairy cows.
  • The undemocratic and highly unpopular 2005 seed pre-emption bill was
    Vilsack's brainchild. The law strips local government¹s right to regulate
    Genetically Engineered seed.
  • Vilsack is an ardent support of corn and soy-based biofuels, which use as
    much or more fossil energy to produce them as they generate, while driving
    up world food prices and literally starving the poor.

If you agree that America doesn't need yet another politician who's already made room in his bed for the industry lobby, join the Organic Consumers Association and sign their petition to block Vilsack's appointment as Secretary of Agriculture. Their online petition can be found here:

TAKE ACTION: Stop Vilsack's Appointment as Secretary of Agriculture.



Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (29)
 
 
Posted On Dec 05, 2008
Michael Pollan is right! No ifs ands or buts!!!

 
4Hand Healthy
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 6/2007
4Hand Healthy  
Replied

curious7
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
curious7  
 
Posted On Dec 27, 2008

4Hand Healthy:

The trick is to silence the wicked lobbists, and allow the truth to be put forward.  I know that food processors employ many people, but this to needs to change.  We need to eat fresh, and locally as much as possible.  This is as big a health issue, as HIV/AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.  

The hard part, is just getting people to listen.



Bill McDougald
Novice User Novice User Joined On 1/2007
Bill McDougald  
 
Posted On Dec 28, 2008

Pollan says the number one thing is a backyard garden, even more healthy if you spray the garden with 84 ionic minerals such as you can get from www.newvision.com, and cook your meals in Saladmaster pots as it says on mercola.com 2002 May 28 that there are critical values for foods and drinks, all between 189  and 206 degrees. One degree over means most of the nutrition is lost. Saladmaster pots have a little cutout in the lid and it begins to click at 170 degrees. That is 3 very good things you can do for your food.


 
 
 
Posted On Dec 09, 2008
When this article came upp dec 5 I paid it a little attention,found it in agreement with my own beliefs,but regarded it as an inter-american topic and did not read more than the overview. But then when reading all your comments and by that had gone to the sources (New  York Times and the Bill Moyers Journal) I realized how "big" this is to us all! Wow! Ubama and Pollan for Nobel prices in Peace and/or Medicin if they succeed. I´m sure Obama will make an effort,if it`s possible-he must-and he knows that. He is an intelligent person and he carries the worlds hope on his shoulders,maybe this hope is greater outside America than within (regarding the views 688resp.484 today-not impressing figures to me) Me and certainly most of the citizens in all western societies hope that he will survive and "make it" despite all threatened interests. But we are all worried.Historically now it`s a golden opportunity when nearly all has or nearly has crashed at the same time-health,economy and climate.Now all can and should be better.Sustainably.

 
ulfpohl
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 11/2008
ulfpohl  
 
 
 
Posted On Dec 27, 2008

This is becoming civil war. It is a good attempt, but who will win?


 
marvinlzinn
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 6/2006
marvinlzinn  
 
 
 
Posted On Dec 09, 2008
Stoic and Noname! I see pretty well where the minus-points come from, but I don`t care as much as you may hope.But what  really concerns me is that you both cannot or rather will not realize all these  obvious mistakes having put us all in this mess.Don`t be egocentrics and think in constructive terms.When reality and ideas collide look att the former one.Reality is always more complex than any ism,you may call it liberalism,socialism,communism or whatever you like.

 
ulfpohl
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 11/2008
ulfpohl  
Replied

stoic
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
stoic  
 
Posted On Dec 09, 2008
ulfpohl...I don't do the thumbs down, or very little anyway (& never in your case) only thumbs up for the few who write things that indicate they know what they are talking about (for moral support, since it is such a small minority)...the ones who don't know what they are talking about, I don't hide behind my thumb - I just tell them....

 
 
 
Posted On Dec 05, 2008
This post was deleted because it violated our Terms Of Use :
Abuse, harass, humiliate, deceive, threaten, impersonate, intimidate or engage in any other abusive behaviors with those who comment on Mercola.com.

 
_No_Name_
Users with negative points NoviceUser, Joined On 4/2008
_No_Name_  
Replied

BobbyLee
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
BobbyLee  
 
Posted On Dec 05, 2008
I heartily concur.  The election that actually counts is on December 15.  All the election in November did was to select the electors from each state.  Sadly, most people have not been taught the real election process.  More evidence of the dumbing down of America.

The idea that any substantive change will come out of either "major" party is laughable on its face.  They are the ones who have in collusion created all the problems we want changed.  Only a true radical will give any kind of change that errs in a positive direction. 

As to the Pollan interview, it's a great idea to actually take on agribusiness, but since agribusiness paid big chunks of $$$ for both McCain and 0bama, I don't see them biting the hand that feeds them.

Papa Lee


bmc
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
bmc  
 
Posted On Dec 06, 2008
BobbyLee, I love how Pollan puts it all together so clearly and concisely. As for agribusiness, what a behemoth to try and take down. Of course if needs to happen, but I bet anyone trying to take away their power would have a huge target on their back. And, you are so right... Having yet another president elected from one of the two main parties is not a route to change, because as you said both candidates are in the pockets of big business. I get really frustrated at the amount of apathy in this country. People should be demanding the elective process be changed. Unfortunately, Obama looks like change to so many and not just in this country, so the status quo is safe for awhile longer. One bright note, this may help with the racial divide (as long as nothing happens to him), although it will do squat for our true freedom.


bmc
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
bmc  
 
Posted On Dec 06, 2008
No Name, we have established that as many as 99% of Americans make up the borg. Do you have any ideas on how to unborg them, because I don't think 1% is enough to accomplish much.


stoic
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
stoic  
 
Posted On Dec 06, 2008
bmc...you probably googled 'nattokinase' by now...here is a bunch on clotting, incl. nk:

http://tinyurl.com/6db37f

as for the borg, you're really asking, "how do we change human nature" (as comprised +/- 1 or 2 standard deviations about the mean) - which is a rhetorical question (I hope). ..

understand..fix your own oxygen mask first, then attend to yours (kith & kin) as best you can...pick up confederates along the way, if you can...completely avoid pitched battles, frontal assaults...

* if stonewall jackson had not been killed (friendly fire!!), lee, I think, would have been convinced to convert to guerrilla tactics, in which case the yanks (borg) would have been done for.....  


bmc
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
bmc  
 
Posted On Dec 06, 2008
Stoic, I did Google nattokinase and I was pretty right on about the definition, and I learned it's supposed to help with clotting. I would have looked into it more but I'm studying for finals. I log onto vital votes for a study break and that takes up enough time as it is. I did try your link but cannot access it.
About changing the borg... rhetorical yes and somewhat no. I understand about fixing oneself first and then teaching family and cohorts as best as possible, but the supposed 1% has been doing this all along, and the % hasn't seemed to grow.


Islander
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 3/2007
Islander  
 
Posted On Dec 06, 2008
No_Name said: "Isn't it funny how they call him the "president-elect" when the election is not until December 15th?"

Since Obama garnered well over the 270 electoral votes he needed to win back on November 4, well, didn't that kinda take the guesswork out of the outcome?


stoic
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
stoic  
 
Posted On Dec 06, 2008
 bmc...don't know why links sometimes dnw...if you go to lef.org, type 'nattokinase' into searchbar, that's the page....

by "rhetorical" I meant that trying to change human nature is worse than tilting at windmills; don't bother. I also did not mean "fix yourself" (& definitely not fix others) - I meant defend yourself, those closest to you, & any confederates you are lucky enough to meet along the way (but this assumes you know what is happening...defense is the only option available...there is no changing the borg...no defeating it, either, in the present, long-running context...best idea: find safe haven(s), & run....

the formula I like - because I have seen it borne out too often - is modified Pareto...instead of 80:20, it is 80:20:20...20% of 20% is 4%.... 

 


stoic
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
stoic  
 
Posted On Dec 06, 2008
<<Since Obama garnered well over the 270 electoral votes he needed to win back on November 4, well, didn't that kinda take the guesswork out of the outcome?

It is probable that obama is Kenya-born, & constitutionally ineligable to be pres......not that the 'founding' tp doc matters.....


bmc
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
bmc  
 
Posted On Dec 06, 2008
stoic, thanks for the clarification on both accounts. No Name, perhaps some soil conversion?

 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.