SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Chocolate Linked to Weaker Bones ... But What Kind of Chocolate?

chocolate, osteoporosis, bone health, heart disease, cardiovascular health, cocoaRegular consumption of chocolate could weaken bone density and strength, which could in turn increase the risk of osteoporosis.

According to a new study, women who eat chocolate daily have an overall bone density 3.1 percent lower than those who consume it less than once a week. More than 1,000 women aged 70-85 were asked to keep a diary of how often they consumed chocolate or cocoa-based drinks.

The researchers did not distinguish between types of chocolate consumed.

Even though chocolate contains flavonols and calcium, both of which are linked to a positive effect on bone density, it also contains oxalate, an inhibitor of calcium absorption, and sugar, which is linked to calcium excretion.

This study comes less than a month after British medical journal the Lancet warned consumers that manufacturers usually remove the healthy element -- the flavonols.


Sources:

Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Despite the fact that this research study dims the lights on the potential health benefits of ALL chocolate, it is important to make a distinction between the type of chocolate consumed.

Regular Mercola.com readers will, of course, already know that the processing chocolate undergoes, and the amount of sugar it contains, makes a huge difference in terms of whether it has health benefits or is just another kind of candy.

The Hidden Danger Lurking in Processed Chocolate

A 2005 study published in the Environmental Health Perspectives found that processed chocolate could be contaminated with extremely high quantities of lead.

However, this was not a new discovery; it had been assumed that cocoa plants were tainted by leaded gasoline. However, a team of researchers found that lead levels in processed chocolate were 60 times higher than could be accounted for by the leaded gasoline theory. Unfortunately, they were unable to pin down whether the additional contamination comes from the shipping, or the manufacturing process itself.

This is a concern, as elevated blood lead levels can produce learning disabilities, and damage your ability to think, plan, organize, and memorize.

Additionally, the standard manufacturing process of milk chocolate destroys about one-quarter to one-half of its flavonoid content, which, as you’ll find out below, is where the health benefits are.

The Difference Between Healthy and Unhealthy Chocolate

Dark, unprocessed chocolate, on the other hand, has been exonerated in several studies as actually having some positive impact on your health.

The flavonols it contains have antioxidant properties that can help protect your body from damaging oxidative stress. It also contains far less sugar than its processed milk chocolate counterpart.

There’s evidence that consumption of dark chocolate can improve your:

The concentration of flavonols in any chocolate depends on:

  • The flavanol content of the cocoa plant it is derived from
  • The procedures used to transform the cocoa into chocolate

Dark chocolate contains a relatively high concentration of flavonols, and researchers believe that the regulation of nitric oxide production by the flavonols found in dark chocolate could explain its positive effects on insulin sensitivity and blood pressure.

Adding milk to the process, however (to create the milk chocolate bars you find in most grocery stores), cancels out the beneficial antioxidant effects. In fact, researchers suggest proteins in the milk bind with antioxidants, making them less easily absorbed by your body. That’s not surprising, considering how pasteurized milk affects you.

What Can Chocolate Cravings Tell You?

If you’re consistently craving sweets, you’re most likely not eating the correct balance of protein, fats, and carbohydrates for your nutritional type.

Once you get most of the sugar out of your diet, your desire for commercially made sweets, including chocolate, WILL change dramatically.

If you tend to crave chocolate when you are upset, bored, or lonely, then you could benefit from resolving these underlying emotional issues (and we all have them) that are driving you to seek comfort from chocolate.

How to Eat Chocolate Without Destroying Your Health

I think it's important to keep in mind that you can derive a majority of these antioxidant benefits by consuming whole unprocessed, preferably organic fruits like blueberries, apples, and grapes, and most vegetables, including broccoli, greens, and onions. This is obviously to be preferred over eating chocolate.

But, if you can’t imagine life without chocolate, these common sense tips can help you indulge safely:

  • Restrict your intake to dark, organic chocolate, which contains the most flavonols, and avoids dangerous processing procedures. The best would be raw cacao, which is relatively bitter because it doesn’t have sugar in it
  • Consume chocolate in moderation
  • Hold off on chocolate if you are struggling with serious disease -- remember that all chocolate contains lots of sugar, which depresses your immune system


Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (66)
 
 
Posted On Jan 17, 2008
"The researchers did not distinguish between types of chocolate consumed" .

Huh where do i begin??????
Everyday we see so many of these so called studies claiming this and claiming that and the very vast majority of them got absolutley no clue of what's good and what's bad for you ,or what the heck they should be looking for, so guess what, their outcomes will always be nothing more than pure garbage like in this case -does'nt it bother you guys. Man they really have been ticking me off with their stupidity and yes this study is not worth the paper it's written on.........

 
seg
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 11/2006
seg  
Replied

Katee Roux
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 7/2007
Katee Roux  
 
Posted On Jan 17, 2008
Very few studies posted these days are truly "scientific."  They have the trappings of science, but only to look good.  Yes, it is frustrating.  And for the general public!  One day they read that anti-oxidants are helpful/healthful.  The next week out comes a report that they are not only NOT helpful/healthful, they do damage to you.

I think that some of this is done on purpose, to make people feel stupid & throw up their hands in despair & quit trying.

I've posted before, last summer i was preparing a dish for a church function.  It was a barbequed mini sausage thing (their recipe).  I looked at 18 forms of barbeque  sauce, & only one did not have HFCS.  Then i read the label of the sausage thing & nearly fainted.  I made the stuff, but told the ladies i'll never again be able to eat it.  The response?  "Oh labels.  You can't read labels or you would never eat anything again!"  Needless to say, i disagree, but it seems to be the response of the general public.


New to Natural
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 11/2007
New to Natural  
 
Posted On Jan 17, 2008
Katee -

Homemade BBQ sauce at it's best:

1 1/2 cups Ketchup
1 Cup Brown Sugar
1/2 tsp. Garlic powder (or a minced clove)
1 tsp. Liquid smoke
Let it simmer until it's as thick as you like it.  MMMM    MMMM     Good! 


PatriSpain
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 7/2007
PatriSpain  
 
Posted On Feb 02, 2008

"Liquid smoke"?  And what is that?  



VitaGuy
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
VitaGuy  
 
Posted On Feb 02, 2008

Katee and New to Natural-

Note that most Ketchup is largely HFCS, so beware!!

Not to mention the salt, red dye, and... oh yes... even a hint of tomato, sometimes!



wikat
Novice User Novice User Joined On 9/2007
wikat  
 
Posted On Feb 02, 2008

By the looks of the study they were using a "kitchen sink" aproach in this study. They did state that cross-sectional and longitudinal studies need to be done as well. Perhaps it's not always the study itself that you are fustrated at but those that interpretate it incorrectly or that put their own spin on it.

In research, as most you you probably know, you start out including everything and then further reaseach tries to narrow the different variables and hopefully eliminates more of the confounding factors (like the calcium/craving theory)as they narrow the scope.



New to Natural
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 11/2007
New to Natural  
 
Posted On Feb 05, 2008

PatriSpain - Liquid smoke is made by capturing steam while smoking meat - some brands have preservatives, some do not - you just need to check the labels.  It adds a great smokey flavor to any dish.  Again, just check the labels!  



loveusa111
Novice User Novice User Joined On 2/2008
loveusa111  
 
Posted On Feb 06, 2008

Attention SEG:

I do have the Fibromyalgia that some do not believe in and I can tell you that Chocolate that is not dark and organic truly effects my whole body. I can be good for weeks and eat a whole chocolate bar and my body just shuts down. I ache with pain, my digestive system messes up and I am very tired for at least 3 days. That kind of proof is better than science or anything else. What the doctor says makes since even if some do not believe it. I also feel that anyone reading this stuff must be searching for something better or they would not be using 'stupidity' as you mentioned to sit and read it to start with. Thank you doctor.


 
 
 
Posted On Jan 17, 2008
How do they know the problem is caused by the chocolate?  Isn't a magnesium deficiency one of the causes of chocolate cravings?  And isn't magnesium needed by the body to absorb/use calcium?

This is the problem with these sorts of studies.  They take a survey on two elements of a (usually) small group of people and come to conclusions without looking at any other factors.

 
DRK_203
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 7/2007
DRK_203  
 
 
 
Posted On Jan 19, 2008
Here is a chocolate testimonial for strong bones:

I eat a lot of chocolate. A LOT.

It is 60% or greater and sometimes totally UNSWEETENED.

About a month ago, I fell down a flight of stairs. I fell about seven or eight feet through the air onto a stair on my right hip and bounced down the remaining five stairs. (ouch)

I weigh (ahem) 145 lbs and am 5' 4" tall. Not obese but pretty chunky.

Aside from a big old bruise on my hip and the back of my right thigh, there was no damage. My chiropractor checked me and I was still in balance.

I'm going to be 56 years old at the end of this month.

Tell me again chocolate makes bones less dense and I will have to hurt someone.


 
Magnolia
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
Magnolia  
Replied

Pat Ormsby
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
Pat Ormsby  
 
Posted On Feb 03, 2008

I'm glad to hear of your experience--especially that you are fine!  You are right, too, that not all chocolate has added sugar.  (There may be some naturally occurring sugars in cacao.  Is that what Dr. Mercola was referring to?)  Chocolate is one of the few treats I can still enjoy now and then.  I get 85% or greater cacao because anything less will provoke cravings.  For Valentines Day, I've gotten some 99% cacao (the other 1% is emulsifier (soy lecithin) and proprietary flavorings--a drag, but what can you do?), which I will melt down gently, add some homegrown stevia and use to coat some dried apple slices I'm preparing now, so that even the sugar junkies can enjoy it, especially as they know I am putting my heart into making something good for them.  In Japan, the ancient (it must be some 30 years now) custom on Valentines Day is for the ladies to give chocolate to all the guys they work with.  Well, I give it to all the guys AND gals I meet that week.  My husband will get some from other people with lots of trans fats, milk, and at the top of the list, you guessed it, sugar!  And it will sit there.  Any good suggestions on what to do with it?



HEALTHCHOCS
Novice User Novice User Joined On 1/2008
HEALTHCHOCS  
 
Posted On Feb 03, 2008

Pat you need to look at Xocai chocolate - there is nothing else like it!



Beccadog
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 10/2007
Beccadog  
 
Posted On Feb 03, 2008

The study was the first of its kind, not proven by any means, and it was a questionaire to persons age 70 and older.  

You, Miss Smug, do not fall into that category, as yet.

I'm 56, do not have bone loss, but have had a total hip and total knee replacement in the last two years.  Both were due to injurry, but only the hip was fractured. My surgeon did the total hip because of my age, not because of bone loss.



Magnolia
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
Magnolia  
 
Posted On Feb 07, 2008

Beccadog, I am sorry to hear of your injury and resulting surgery. Hope you're doing better now. I actually cracked my hip many years ago in a freak accident. They elected not to put a cast on, but I was out of commission for several months. I empathize with you entirely.

Pat, your apples sound yummy! As for the stuff your husband will get from other people, you'll have to figure out what to do with that on your own.


 
 
 
Posted On Jan 16, 2008
Chocolate should be an occasional treat and as minimally processed as possible, but then most people would not be able to handle the bitter taste. 

Mary

 
mmc88121
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 11/2006
mmc88121  
Replied

Kissamee
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 12/2007
Kissamee  
 
Posted On Jan 17, 2008
double post sorry

Kel


Kissamee
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 12/2007
Kissamee  
 
Posted On Jan 17, 2008
bitter is best

Kel

 
 
 
Posted On Jan 16, 2008
oh no not chocolate...dark chocolate and mercolas cocao bars are my only sweet  treat besides fruit...please tell me it is'nt true.

 
moo_203
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 11/2006
moo_203  
Replied

Reesacat
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 1/2007
Reesacat  
 
Posted On Jan 16, 2008
The only thing about chocolate being dangerous to bone health is if you take away chocolate from a large group of women.

The people taking the chocolate away are in grave danger of having many bones broken............

Step away from the chocolate and you won't be hurt...


Kissamee
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 12/2007
Kissamee  
 
Posted On Jan 17, 2008
PPargamma I got one word for you, Pants!

I totally agree with you, Again!

Kel


EQ
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 3/2007
EQ  
 
Posted On Feb 04, 2008

Oh Yes, Reesacat!  I'm totally with you on this one.  

...and I'll stick to the super dark organic stuff.


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.