Merck's Latest Drug Scam a Worthless Diabetes Drug

The FDA has approved Januvia, the first drug in a new class of diabetes medications.

An FDA official stated that it would provide "an important alternative" to current treatments for type 2 diabetes. A second drug of the same type, Galvus, is in the final stages of FDA review.

Januvia and Galvus work by enhancing natural body processes that keeps blood glucose at a safe level. The drugs block the action of an enzyme called dipeptidyl peptidase 4, or DPP-4. DPP-4 inactivates the hormones that stimulate the production of insulin.

Because the drugs functions only when blood sugar levels rise, it does not appear to cause the plunges in blood sugar associated with other diabetes treatments such as insulin.

Januvia was clinically tested on over 2,700 patients in studies lasting from 12 weeks to over a year. Side effects included respiratory infection, sore throat and diarrhea.

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

In its very finite wisdom, the FDA has another probably useless, and maybe dangerous drug called Januvia, coincidently marketed in America by Merck. And, pending final FDA approvals, Novartis may launch a second DPP-4 inhibitor, Galvus, by year's end.

No doubt, that rosy news about new diabetes drug in the pipeline contributed to Merck and Novartis stocks climbing by about a half-dollar. Of course, that'll happen with any drug costing patients close to $5 per pill, per day as Januvia does, especially since 17 million Americans have full-blown diabetes, and over 16 million Americans now have pre-diabetes. So 12 percent of the U.S. population now suffers from some type of diabetes.


Many of you may not realize that we now have a new forum where health care professionals and others can interact.

Dr. Ron  D'Agostino from L'Anse,Michigan posted the following intersesting comment on this article:

Although I agree completely that drugs are useless, and that any treatment of type 2 diabetes besides diet and exercise is enabling and therefore worse than nothing, non-physicians should realize:

1) Dr Mercola's patient population is enviably anomolous;

2) most patients do not go to their doctor to ask how to prevent type 2 diabetes, either we find it or they already have it.  They come to us with a problem they want solved in 10 min without effort on their part, and that their "insurance" will cover.  They expect this to occur and if it does not, they are nonplused.  When  they learn that they have to eat right and exercise, and then learn what that means speciffically, they refuse.  They want a pill, and it better not be >$20/mon co-pay.

If you argue with them they will usually leave the practice.  If you try to do it over the course of tx, say years, a little at a time, the effect is so incrementally small -v- what you know a full blown natural treatment would provide that I just give up.  There's not enough satifaction for me to offset the time and lost money of cajoling/patient loss.

I am starting to believe that I'm the one with a problem.  These pts know  eating like pigs and not exercising  causes their health problems and shortened life spans.  They  have simply made a choice with which I do not agree.  I think they are for the most part aware that the pills may help a little given that they are not going to change.

So I, like most of the profession and the drug companies catering to them, will ask once or twice if they want health or enablement, and go with their choice.  At least untill I can stand it no longer and flip to diet dictocrat.

Such is the schizophrenia of  trying to act on rationalization.


I could not disagree more strongly with Dr. D's post. Type 2 diabetes is virtaully 100% curable with proper diet and exericse. I have personally mentored many hundreds of people through this process.

Dr. D you are GIVING UP on them and not giving them a chance. Nearly all of those that you are giving up on hae significant psychoemotional issues that prevent them from applying this nearly universal effective strategies.

Patients should certainly have freedom of choice, but I do not believe that
offering them an expensive "magic pill" that is questionably effective at best,

  •  in no way shape or form addresses the cause of the disease, and
  • has a serious chance of actually causing more problems than it solives

is truly serving your patients.

Dr. D you have capitulated and surrendered to the drug model and doing your patients a great disservice by not offering them an example of what is possilble and providing them with tools to achieve it.

If they still choose the easy way there are plenty of ignorant physicians who will gladly cooperate with them and prescribe these deadly and ineffective nostrums till the cows come home.

Diabetes is an artifact of poor lifestyle choices, and it is curable, although not with a drug. Even the New England Journal of Medicine acknowledged five years ago that a healthier diet -- ideally based on your body's unique nutritional type -- and an exercise program can completely eradicate diabetes, an artifact of poor lifestyle choices.

Without exercise, I would be a type 2 diabetic. Running 20 miles a week seems to keep my blood sugar in a nearly ideal range.

When I reduce my miles to five or less, my blood sugar gradually rises to the diabetic range. One does not have to run 20 miles per week, but most diabetics will benefit from one hour of intense exercise at least five times per week, and more if their blood sugar is currently out of control.

Post your comment