|
Is it the end of the
line for this popular class of drugs?
In findings that may well sound the "death
knell" for the popular class of drugs known as calcium channel blockers
(CCBs), the longer-acting versions of the drugs failed to reduce the risk
of heart disease, despite the fact that they were effective in reducing
blood pressure.
-
The study's authors maintain that this makes
the drugs inferior to other blood pressure-lowering medications that
have been around longer and are a lot cheaper as well.
-
According to one of the study's authors, Dr.
Michael H. Alderman, "There is no difference between CCBs and
other drugs in terms of lowering blood pressure."
But lowering blood pressure alone means little
if the drugs don't decrease the risk of cardiac problems associated with
having high blood pressure.
-
Researchers analyzed nine clinical trials that
included more than 27,000 patients.
-
Patients treated with CCBs had a 27% increased
risk of heart attacks than in patients treated with other blood pressure
medications.
Dr. Alderman feels that other drugs given to lower
blood pressure may reduce atherosclerosis, thereby lowering blood pressure
and simultaneously reduces the incidence of cardiac events such as heart
attack.
-
Among CCB users, the risk of heart failure was
26% higher, and the risk of any major cardiovascular event was 11%
above the risk associated with the use of other blood pressure-lowering
drugs.
-
All the calcium channel blockers included in
the study yielded similar results, Alderman added.
Although CCBs were introduced within the past decade
and are longer lasting than other antihypertensive medications, they are
also significantly more expensive, costing up to 15 times more than some
diuretics, leading Dr. Alderman to make the observation that "The
other drugs are cheaper but vastly superior."
As a result of his findings, Dr. Alderman believes
that CCBs may be "a drug of rather last resort," and he recommends
that people currently taking CCBs should consult their physicians.
Meeting of the European
Society of Cardiology in Amsterdam, the Netherlands August, 2000
|