By Susan Okie
A newly identified, antibiotic-resistant strain of a common bacterium is contributing to an increase in relatively hard-to-treat bladder infections in women in at least three U.S. cities.
Genetic analysis and other laboratory tests pinpointed the strain of Escherichia coli bacteria as the culprit in a substantial percentage of drug-resistant urinary tract infections among female university students in Berkeley, Calif., Minneapolis and Ann Arbor, Mich.
The microbes implicated in the Michigan and Minnesota infections were almost identical to the California ones, which suggests the recent arrival or emergence of a new drug-resistant strain that has spread rapidly to different parts of the country.
"I think calling it an epidemic is reasonable," said J. Glenn Morris, professor and chairman of the department of epidemiology and preventive medicine at the University of Maryland Medical School. "You probably do have strains that are coming from a common source and are responsible for an increase above expected numbers" of drug-resistant infections.
About 11 percent of women suffer at least one bladder infection annually, and more than half of all women experience at least one in their lifetime. It is thought that bacteria from the large intestine gain access to the bladder, perhaps during sexual activity or because of predisposing factors. The infections make urination frequent and often painful, but most cases can be easily treated with antibiotics. E. coli is a common cause.
Not much is known about how new strains of bacteria that infect the urinary tract arise and spread. E. coli and many other bacteria are normally present in the large intestine, and diarrhea-causing strains are sometimes spread through contaminated food. There is no evidence that the strain causing the bladder infections in California, Michigan and Minnesota came from food, but researchers said that was a possibility.
There is also no evidence that the new strain of E. coli is causing any increase in kidney infections or other serious complications. The bladder infections of women in the study, although resistant to some drugs, remained susceptible to other antibiotics.
Researchers at the University of California at Berkeley undertook the study because they were concerned about a recent rise in bladder infections among women treated at the student health clinic that were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, a popular two-drug combination.
Amee R. Manges, a graduate student who led the study, said she and her colleagues were surprised to find virtually the same microbe causing infections in three states.
"We were really expecting to see maybe some small clusters of similar organisms, but we were not expecting to see . . . that all these unrelated women would have urinary tract infections due to the identical strain," she said.
The California researchers found the same strain of E. coli in a number of stool samples obtained from healthy men and women seen at the clinic. However, Manges said, they were not able to determine how and when the strain first arrived in the population.
"It could be that this organism has been around forever and has now acquired resistance to several antibiotics," she said. Alternatively, she added, it could have been introduced, "maybe not too long ago," perhaps through contaminated food.
The research team analyzed bacteria in urine samples but did not interview the infected women or read their medical records, so they could not determine whether they had any common exposures or risk factors. Manges said an additional study will explore such questions.
"I would guess that [the strain] is fairly recent in origin," said Walter E. Stamm, a professor of medicine at the University of Washington who wrote a accompanying commentary.
Drug-resistant intestinal bacteria from farm animals, which are often given antibiotics in feed, have sometimes been transmitted to farmers, food handlers or others, Stamm said. "Those pathways have been documented, but not for this strain or for strains causing urinary tract infections," he said.
In the study, researchers studied 255 samples of E. coli isolated from the urine of women with bladder infections seen at the Berkeley clinic. Fifty-five (22 percent) were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
They compared them with 18 similarly resistant samples of E. coli from women treated in Minneapolis and 29 from women in Ann Arbor. Researchers analyzed the genetic "fingerprints" of each sample using two techniques, tested each for antibiotic susceptibility and performed serotyping, a method of grouping bacteria according to proteins on their surfaces.
The tests showed that more than half of the resistant infections at the Berkeley clinic were caused by a single strain.
A nearly identical strain was implicated in 38 percent of the resistant infections in Michigan and 39 percent in Minnesota. The strain showed a pattern of resistance to multiple antibiotics and had genetic characteristics called "virulence factors" that increased its ability to infect the urinary tract.
Washington Post October 4, 2001; Page A03
NEJM 2001;345:1007-1013, 1055-1057
Prevention of these infections is clearly the best option, especially in light of the increase in strains that are becoming resistant to antibiotics.
In that light following it would be wise to consider proactive steps to prevent them. In the 20 plus years I have been practicing clinical medicine, it has been my observation that one of the most frequent causes of these infections are less than careful hygiene after one develops loose stools or diarrhea.
It is very easy to contaminate one's fingers when wiping oneself with toilet paper, and if those contaminated fingers come anywhere close to the opening of the urethra, there is a high likelihood of infection in predisposed individuals. Additionally, using white toilet paper that is unscented is less likely to cause irritation.
If you are among the11 percent of women who suffer at least one bladder infection annually (as cited above), my current recommendation is the active ingredient found in cranberries called mannose. In the past, mannose has been difficult to obtain due to costs and manufacturing capabilities. The pure, high-quality form has just recently become commercially available as a natural supplement, and now I can finally offer it to you!
ClearTract D-Mannose is not a drug. This nutritional supplement occurs naturally in peaches, apples, and berries. D-mannose is a rare saccharide found in some plant and food substances -- and we even produce it in our own bodies. Non-toxic and safe, ClearTract D-Mannose:
The mannose actually adheres to the receptors on the lining of the bladder that attach to the bacteria. This forces the bacteria to slide right off and into the toilet. It is amazingly effective, but you must remember it is only a Band-Aid, though a far safer one than prophylactic antibiotic use or cranberry juice.
Related Articles:
Mom's Urinary Tract Infections Increases Risk of Retardation Does Cranberry Juice Have Antibacterial Acitivty? Looking at the Color Of Your Urine Can Diagnose an Infection or If You're Dehydrated
Mom's Urinary Tract Infections Increases Risk of Retardation
Does Cranberry Juice Have Antibacterial Acitivty?
Looking at the Color Of Your Urine Can Diagnose an Infection or If You're Dehydrated