SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Gardasil Reactions and Deaths on the Rise

In May 2007, it was reported that over 1,600 adverse reactions, including three deaths, had been linked to Gardasil, Merck’s new vaccine for human papillomavirus (HPV).

Among those reactions, 371 were classified as serious, and, of the 42 women who received the vaccine while pregnant, 18 experienced side effects including spontaneous abortion and fetal abnormalities.

It appears those reactions, and deaths, are steadily rising. A review of the National Vaccine Information Center revealed the following statistic about this vaccine: 2,207 adverse reactions to Gardasil have been reported. Among them:
  • 5 girls died
  • 31 were considered life-threatening
  • 1,385 required a visit to the emergency room
  • 451 of the girls have not recovered as of July 2007
  • 51 of the girls were disabled
Gardasil “may be more dangerous than consumers have been led to believe,” according to one public-interest group, and an editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine has also raised questions about the vaccine‘s effectiveness.

The Heartland Institute August 1, 2007

Renew America July 22, 2007



Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

These are hefty risks for a vaccine that only sometimes protects against HPV, which is virtually 100 percent avoidable without a vaccine.

It’s essential to get the facts about HPV before considering this or any potentially dangerous vaccine. First off, although there are more than 6 million cases of HPV each year, just 2 percent of the patients in a recent study were infected by the kinds of HPV that put them at high risk for developing cervical cancer.

Furthermore, about 90 percent of HPV cases clear up on their own within two years.

You need to be aware that if you eat right, exercise and keep stress in your life under control, your immune system is typically healthy enough to clear up the vast majority of HPV infections.

In addition, the vaccine is not fool-proof. You can still get “non-vaccine” types of HPV even if you get vaccinated. In fact, a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that only 3 percent of their study participants were infected with the types of HPV that Gardasil was concocted to prevent.

Finally, remember that HPV is a sexually transmitted disease, which means that it is also easily preventable by modifying your lifestyle habits.


Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (43)
 
 
Posted On Jul 24, 2007
Web research has produced the following info on the "science" behind Gardasil:

It's only a hypothesis that cervical cancer is caused by HPV, based on epidemiological (population) studies (which can be made to say anything) rather than any kind of scientific clinical trial.  Furthermore the incredulous "hypothesis" of HPV-based cervical cancer is that it "starts" the cancer, and then the HPV removes itself from the scene of the tumor.

HPV has never been proven to be the cause of any disease, much less cervical cancer.

Though HPV may be present in some cases of cervical cancer, no type of virus is consistently present in all cases of cervical cancer.

There is no evidence that cervical cancer appears more often in women with HPV than without it.

Yet, Merck's insert for Gardasil makes the statement that “HPV causes squamous cell cervical cancer.”

As tenuous as general vaccine theory is, Gardasil stretches credulity, as it contains "particles" of only four (out of over 100) known HPV strains, and not the whole, mutated, or weakened virus, so any kind of antibody production effect is remote in the extreme, even if HPV could trigger cancer, which it apparently cannot.

The average age of cervical cancer is 50, yet the drug is administered to 12-year-olds, granting "immunity" for all of five years.  So they'd need the set of three shots again at 17, 22, 27, 32, 37, 42, and 47 before they'd enter the window where cervical cancer is most likely.

Gardasil itself has a long list of actual, serious, known side-effects, yet provides only imagined (or at best, theoretical) immunity.

Gardasil itself has not been evaluated as a carcinogen.

Gardasil has not been evaluated for any long-term effects on fertility.

Taken as a whole, it would appear the only thing Merk is attempting to inoculate against is their own decline in revenue.


 
Bob2_203
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
Bob2_203  
Replied

misslady09
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2008
misslady09  
 
Posted On Apr 03, 2008

I completely agree with your view on GARDASIL.  My daughter is 12 and I refuse to get her the shot until it is prove that the long term benifits out weigh the hazards.  I choose to enforce the importance of absinence, slef respect, and safe sex.  I tell her you have 3 choices: 1) don't have sex, save it for marriage, 2) practice safe sex, or 3) suffer the consequences and don't say you were not informed!  I provide her with information on the statistics of STD's and the risks, so she is well informed and I can only hope she makes responsible decisions.


 
 
 
Posted On Jul 23, 2007
Since when is death an acceptable risk?

Mary

 
mmc88121
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 11/2006
mmc88121  
 
 
 
Posted On Jul 25, 2007
WHO is selling fatal Snake Oil now???!!! 

Answer:  MERCK

Merck LIES, LIES, LIES!!!
http://www.mercola.com/2005/mar/26/merck_vaccines.htm

.

 
helpingheart
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
helpingheart  
 
 
 
Posted On Jul 23, 2007
I was in a college clinic last week doing an internship thing so I was working with an M.D.  I was absolutely horrified when we were seeing a young man who had a genital wart (HPV).  He asked the Doctor if it was spreadable to others and the Dr. said yes, but that girls of a sexually active age should be getting the HPV vaccine anyway.  
I controlled myself, but in my head my jaw was on the floor.  I couldn't believe the Dr. gave no talk about safe sex practices, hygiene, etc.  and that he essentially told the boy not to worry because it is the girls responsibility to protect herself. 

 
Matt79
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 8/2006
Matt79  
Replied

minnie-me
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
minnie-me  
 
Posted On Jul 25, 2007
arrrggghhhh.... This is one disgusting excuse for a human being... and a Doctor, no less. But then, should I be surprised????


louisejana
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2007
louisejana  
 
Posted On Aug 09, 2007

This is a comment for the fellow who was in a clinic with the MD who told a young man it was the girl's responsibility......clearly that doctor was not only negligent in his duties, but also sexist and prejudiced. I would report his comments and behavior to whoever is the administrative director of the clinic and also inform them that you plan to followl-up with a letter to the Medical Board of that state explaining about that doctor's comments. I think when we encounter health practitioners who are negligent and who clearly add to the complexity of any health problem rather than doing what they can to relieve the problem and educate the population, then they need to be counseled or put on probation. Unfortunately it is often difficult to get such interventions, disciplinary action and counseling with doctors. But I think perhaps now more than before, the medical boards and administrators are more open to that. As health consumers we have the right to expect respect from our health practitioners and to expect support, advocacy and education. If we feel we are not getting these needs met, we have the right to complain. When no one complains, then nothing is done and the same problems and behaviors with such doctors persist.

As I nurse, I do come in contact with doctors who are not good educators and are lacking in some basic social skills in dealing with patients, but fortunately, they are in the minority. More and more doctors now are being trained in how to communicate with patients and families and in the importance of patient education. This doctor clearly was very biased and prejudiced and needs disciplinary action.



louisejana
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2007
louisejana  
 
Posted On Aug 09, 2007

This is a comment for the fellow who was in a clinic with the MD who told a young man it was the girl's responsibility......clearly that doctor was not only negligent in his duties, but also sexist and prejudiced. I would report his comments and behavior to whoever is the administrative director of the clinic and also inform them that you plan to followl-up with a letter to the Medical Board of that state explaining about that doctor's comments. I think when we encounter health practitioners who are negligent and who clearly add to the complexity of any health problem rather than doing what they can to relieve the problem and educate the population, then they need to be counseled or put on probation. Unfortunately it is often difficult to get such interventions, disciplinary action and counseling with doctors. But I think perhaps now more than before, the medical boards and administrators are more open to that. As health consumers we have the right to expect respect from our health practitioners and to expect support, advocacy and education. If we feel we are not getting these needs met, we have the right to complain. When no one complains, then nothing is done and the same problems and behaviors with such doctors persist.

As I nurse, I do come in contact with doctors who are not good educators and are lacking in some basic social skills in dealing with patients, but fortunately, they are in the minority. More and more doctors now are being trained in how to communicate with patients and families and in the importance of patient education. This doctor clearly was very biased and prejudiced and needs disciplinary action.



louisejana
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2007
louisejana  
 
Posted On Aug 09, 2007

This is a comment for the fellow who was in a clinic with the MD who told a young man it was the girl's responsibility......clearly that doctor was not only negligent in his duties, but also sexist and prejudiced. I would report his comments and behavior to whoever is the administrative director of the clinic and also inform them that you plan to followl-up with a letter to the Medical Board of that state explaining about that doctor's comments. I think when we encounter health practitioners who are negligent and who clearly add to the complexity of any health problem rather than doing what they can to relieve the problem and educate the population, then they need to be counseled or put on probation. Unfortunately it is often difficult to get such interventions, disciplinary action and counseling with doctors. But I think perhaps now more than before, the medical boards and administrators are more open to that. As health consumers we have the right to expect respect from our health practitioners and to expect support, advocacy and education. If we feel we are not getting these needs met, we have the right to complain. When no one complains, then nothing is done and the same problems and behaviors with such doctors persist.

As I nurse, I do come in contact with doctors who are not good educators and are lacking in some basic social skills in dealing with patients, but fortunately, they are in the minority. More and more doctors now are being trained in how to communicate with patients and families and in the importance of patient education. This doctor clearly was very biased and prejudiced and needs disciplinary action.



louisejana
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2007
louisejana  
 
Posted On Aug 09, 2007

This is a comment for the fellow who was in a clinic with the MD who told a young man it was the girl's responsibility......clearly that doctor was not only negligent in his duties, but also sexist and prejudiced. I would report his comments and behavior to whoever is the administrative director of the clinic and also inform them that you plan to followl-up with a letter to the Medical Board of that state explaining about that doctor's comments. I think when we encounter health practitioners who are negligent and who clearly add to the complexity of any health problem rather than doing what they can to relieve the problem and educate the population, then they need to be counseled or put on probation. Unfortunately it is often difficult to get such interventions, disciplinary action and counseling with doctors. But I think perhaps now more than before, the medical boards and administrators are more open to that. As health consumers we have the right to expect respect from our health practitioners and to expect support, advocacy and education. If we feel we are not getting these needs met, we have the right to complain. When no one complains, then nothing is done and the same problems and behaviors with such doctors persist.

As I nurse, I do come in contact with doctors who are not good educators and are lacking in some basic social skills in dealing with patients, but fortunately, they are in the minority. More and more doctors now are being trained in how to communicate with patients and families and in the importance of patient education. This doctor clearly was very biased and prejudiced and needs disciplinary action.



louisejana
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2007
louisejana  
 
Posted On Aug 09, 2007

This is a comment for the fellow who was in a clinic with the MD who told a young man it was the girl's responsibility......clearly that doctor was not only negligent in his duties, but also sexist and prejudiced. I would report his comments and behavior to whoever is the administrative director of the clinic and also inform them that you plan to followl-up with a letter to the Medical Board of that state explaining about that doctor's comments. I think when we encounter health practitioners who are negligent and who clearly add to the complexity of any health problem rather than doing what they can to relieve the problem and educate the population, then they need to be counseled or put on probation. Unfortunately it is often difficult to get such interventions, disciplinary action and counseling with doctors. But I think perhaps now more than before, the medical boards and administrators are more open to that. As health consumers we have the right to expect respect from our health practitioners and to expect support, advocacy and education. If we feel we are not getting these needs met, we have the right to complain. When no one complains, then nothing is done and the same problems and behaviors with such doctors persist.

As I nurse, I do come in contact with doctors who are not good educators and are lacking in some basic social skills in dealing with patients, but fortunately, they are in the minority. More and more doctors now are being trained in how to communicate with patients and families and in the importance of patient education. This doctor clearly was very biased and prejudiced and needs disciplinary action.


 
 
 
Posted On Jul 22, 2007
We need Ron Paul to be our next president of this USA, or it will be to late for all of us.

Please help to move this wonderful man into office.  www.ronpaul2008.com

 
annapavlova42
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 2/2007
annapavlova42  
Replied

southcoastgrl
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 5/2007
southcoastgrl  
 
Posted On Aug 09, 2007

Hey, can we get off the Ron Paul bandwagon just for one thread??Its really getting annoying..


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.