FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
August 07 2007
Scientists Warn -- Dangerous Chemical Found in Plastic

An estrogen-like compound widely used in plastic products is thought to be causing serious reproductive disorders, according to a statement by several dozen scientists, including four from federal health agencies.

The compound, bisphenol A (BPA), is one of the most-produced chemicals in the world, and almost everyone has traces of it -- or more -- in their bodies.

After reviewing about 700 studies, the scientists concluded that people are exposed to levels of BPA in excess of those that have harmed lab animals. Among the most vulnerable are infants and fetuses, who are still developing.

BPA is used to make hard plastic that’s used in numerous products including:

  • Polycarbonate plastic baby bottles
  • Large water-cooler containers and sports bottles
  • Microwave-oven dishes
  • Canned-food liners
  • Some dental sealants for children

The statement appeared alongside five accompanying scientific reviews and a new study by the National Institutes of Health that found newborn animals exposed to BPA suffered from uterine damage. The damage could indicate that the chemical causes reproductive disorders in women ranging from fibroids to endometriosis to cancer.

While studies have yet to be conducted to directly examine BPA’s influence on humans, past animal studies have found low doses of the chemical to be associated with early-stage prostate and *** cancers and decreased sperm count.

No governmental agency worldwide has restricted the use of BPA, but a U.S. expert panel is meeting to discuss whether the chemical should be declared a human reproductive toxin, which could lead to regulatory action.

The chemical industry maintains that BPA is safe, and has called the scientists’ statement “alarmist and biased.”

Reproductive Toxicology July 2007

Seattle Times August 3, 2007



Dr. MercolaDr. Mercola's Comments:
The use of BPA has clearly spiraled out of control, and now we are having to face the dire consequences. The scientists found that 95 percent of the people tested had levels of BPA in their bodies that could be harmful.

Perhaps the biggest victims in all of this are fetuses and infants, who may be exposed to the chemical in utero or quite literally “fed” the chemical via plastic baby bottles and toys (which they often put in their mouths).

The problem with BPA is that it doesn’t stay in the plastic. It leeches into whatever food or beverage you put in a plastic container, canned good, or plastic baby bottle. And if you microwave the containers or bottles, you are likely increasing the amount of BPA that leaches into your food.

Another point worth noting is that BPA supposedly does not hang around in your body long after you’re exposed. Yet, this chemical is so pervasive that the scientists think people are simply being continually exposed to it from food, air, dust, and even just by touching items that contain BPA.

BPA mimics the sex hormone estradiol, which can trigger major changes in your body. The problems associated with even small amounts of BPA include:
  • Structural damage to your brain
  • Hyperactivity
  • Abnormal sexual behavior
  • Increased fat formation and risk of obesity
  • Early puberty and disrupted reproductive cycles
The potential risks of BPA have been being debated for years. Meanwhile, people just keep on ingesting this toxin -- at levels that are anyone’s guess.

Several readers have commented that, even if BPA does eventually get restricted, there are countless other dangerous chemicals still out there. This is, sadly, very true. The EPA approves new chemicals to the tune of some 700 every year! Still, every step you take toward eliminating a toxin from the products you use is a good one.

Of course, I personally would not wait for a government restriction to begin reducing my exposure to this toxin. The evidence that has amassed thus far is enough to convince me.

To be fair, you probably can no longer completely eliminate your exposure to BPA (since it’s likely in our air, water, and food, too) but you can certainly reduce it. The following tips will not only reduce your exposure to BPA, but also to many of the other dangerous plastics chemicals as well.

10 Tips to Reduce Your Exposure to BPA

1. Only use glass baby bottles and dishes for your baby

2. Give your baby natural fabric toys instead of plastic ones

3. Store your food and beverages in glass -- NOT plastic -- containers

4. IF you choose to use a microwave, don’t microwave food in a plastic container

5. Stop buying and consuming canned foods and drinks

6. Avoid using plastic wrap (and never microwave anything covered in it)

7. Get rid of your plastic dishes and cups, and replace them with glass varieties

8. If you opt to use plastic kitchenware, at least get rid of the older, scratched-up varieties, avoid putting them in the dishwasher, and don’t wash them with harsh detergents, as these things can cause more chemicals to leach into your food

9. Avoid using bottled water; filter your own using a reverse osmosis filter instead

10. Before allowing a dental sealant to be applied to you, or your children’s, teeth, ask your dentist to verify that it does not contain BPA

In the event that you do opt to use plastic containers for your food, be sure to avoid those marked on the bottom with the recycling label No. 7, as these varieties may contain BPA.

Containers marked with the recycling labels No. 1, No. 2, and No. 4 do not contain BPA (however they may contain other unsavory chemicals that you’re best off avoiding by using glass instead).



Related Articles:

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 57 )
Comment on this Article
  
  
Russ Bianchi
[ Joined on 09/06 ] [ Posted on August 6, 2007 ]
7 Points        
   
 
Savvy User
Only 6% of all polymers (plastics) are recycled, not the urban legend out there of a higher number, as is the case with Aluminum or Glass.

All plastics are petro chemical based.  Eliminate plastic usage and the number of barrels per day reduced in foreign oil importation is STAGGERING in large volume.

The line of job/investment advice to Dustin Hoffman's character in 'The Graduate', that "Plastics" is the future, is wrong; it is our undoing - economically, environmentally, and optimum preventable health.

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
Dr.B
[ Joined on 08/07 ]  [ Posted on August 7, 2007]
10 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola
Oh yes and now Healthy Choice is marketing their healthy meals that you can take out of the freezer and pop in the microwave. In a plastic bowl with a plastic wrap cover....lovely.....how many more women have to be diagnosed with unexplained breast cancer before they do something?!?!
Mercola
  
Gary J Collins
[ Joined on 06/07 ]  [ Posted on August 25, 2007]
3 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

Unfortunately while the oil industry can make huge amounts of money from the plastics industry, we will never eradicate it from our lives. The production of Ethylene has proven worth over three thousand fold of gasoline. While there is the demand for ethylene it will still be produced. China alone in 1999, estimated the production to be worth $67 million US for 4.6 million tonnes and expects the demand to be 12 million tonnes by 2012.

Whilst there is this inexpensive plastic available, and the alternatives becoming more expensive, the alternatives will become ever more harder to obtain. Both as commercial products and for domestic usage.

Added to this is the very persuasive PR machine and the "Western world's" desire to take the quick and easy way to do things.

  
  
mmc88121
[ Joined on 11/06 ] [ Posted on August 6, 2007 ]
7 Points        
   
 
Moderator User
I noticed the plastic industry stated that the scientist were biased and the science did not really support their position.  However, they are also biased that there is nothing wrong with their products.

Mary
 [ Reply ]
  
  
goldeneagle
[ Joined on 04/07 ] [ Posted on August 7, 2007 ]
4 Points        
   
 
Savvy User
Maybe it isn't just the immunizations that are causing children to have autism and be ill.  We have created our very own tower of Babel in the chemical building blocks of industrialization.
 [ Reply ]
  
  
Sunshine712
[ Joined on 08/07 ] [ Posted on August 25, 2007 ]
2 Points        
   
 
Novice User

So now what do you all think of the new steamer bags from Ziploc ? Will anyone buy them ? I don't know why they keep coming up with more ways to use the microwave and plastic. Seems the BIG companies are filling our minds with these wasy to use items and forgeting about the health issues.Kudos to all the people who want to be more healthy keep up the good investagative work in uncovering this issues that the average consumer is unaware of. I feel sorry that every Human doesn't know these things and we can't trust our government or Big business to lead us in the right direction.

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
triciarr
[ Joined on 03/07 ]  [ Posted on October 28, 2007]
       
   
Savvy User
  Mercola

Yes, Ziploc bags in the microwave nonetheless...

Tricia

  
  
bagarino
[ Joined on 01/07 ] [ Posted on August 25, 2007 ]
2 Points        
   
 
Novice User

Re. Canned goods. I think there is a trade-off to be made here. In an ideal world we would, of course, eat fresh eleven times out of ten, but, and it's a big but, there are several reasons why canned might have to be used: 1) cost, 2) convenience and 3) seasonality.

I eat tinned fish every day of my life (sardines and tuna). I don't have the time, the ability, the money or the servants to prepare fresh fish every day, and besides, fresh tuna could come from the Med. (high mercury levels compared to ocean-caught), my head is full of mercury amalgam fillings and there is plenty of evidence that chemicals other than the oil in oily fish are cardio-protective. I buy an Atlantic-caught variety, Fresh sardines are available for about 3 months in the summer. What should I do? Move to Portugal?

As regards my exposure to BPA, that's the -ve that goes with the +ve of the oily fish and I've decided to accept it. There is some evidence that % bodyfat influences POC (persistent organic chemical) accumulation in the body (low b.f = low POC and vice versa), rather than actual POC exposure, as the POCs dissolve in your body fat and go in and out of solution, whereas low b.f males have low POC and higher testosterone levels than plump guys. Active people have active body fat (built up and broken down) and the body has a chance to excrete or break-down the POCs (including BPA) when they go into solution. Choosing the low b.f / mobile b.f option through diet and exercise won't help the levels of exposure but will reduce the amount of time the chemicals stay in my body.

That's my take on it anyway.

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
KH-Austin
[ Joined on 04/07 ]  [ Posted on September 5, 2007]
       
   
Novice User
  Mercola

I've eaten a lot of canned food over the years too - and used Ziplocs but not microwaves (I never liked microwaved food). Anyway, I think the point with this kind of info. is to try to stop it from continuing not immediately change everyone's lives. We all do our best but it's next to impossible to avoid contamination from man made chemicals. I wonder what's in some of the mineral supplements I've been taking - and of course most of these are in plastic bottles. I'm going to make a real effort to change that at least.

  
  
Vicki Marie
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on August 7, 2007 ]
2 Points        
   
 
Savvy User
And here I thought I was doing good by getting my son sealants on his molars to keep from getting cavaties and fighting with a doctor about mercury fillings . . .
 [ Reply ]
  
  
Islander
[ Joined on 03/07 ] [ Posted on August 6, 2007 ]
2 Points        
   
 
Savvy User
So...this is just one more of the 287 chemicals, pollutants and pesticides that cross the placenta of infants everywhere in the world. Of these, we know that 180 cause cancer in humans or animals, 217 are toxic to the brain and nervous system, and 208 cause birth defects or abnormal development in animal tests. Details: http://archive.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/execsumm.php

It would certainly be beneficial to ban BPA, but what about the other 286?  It really is hopeless. I know that this news is about as welcome as hair in a biscuit, but even if you lived in a cave, ate bark and twigs and drank glacial meltwater, your body still carries a chemical burden. And the glaciers are melting.
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
Maj
[ Joined on 03/07 ]  [ Posted on August 6, 2007]
9 Points        
   
Savvy User
  Mercola
Islander said: It would certainly be beneficial to ban BPA, but what about the other 286?

How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.

By recognizing one chemical hormone-mimic as toxic, that opens the door for other chemicals to be labeled as bad for the same reasons. Yes, it sucks that we can't just ban them all at once, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't take a step forward - no matter how small it is. One baby step is better than not moving at all.

:)
  
  
Dr.G
[ Joined on 01/07 ] [ Posted on August 27, 2007 ]
1 Points        
   
 
Novice User

I'm glad this is an issue we are looking at seriously.  Having access to the mainstream literature, it does seem to be a problem that has been ignored.  I wanted to share the first line of an email sent out by the American Dental Association regarding BPA:

Dear Colleague:

The safety of bisphenol A (BPA) has been called into question in recent media coverage. BPA is a chemical found in many hard plastics and used in resins that line food and beverage cans. Although some believe BPA is an ingredient in dental sealants and composites, it isn’t, although there’s some evidence that some dental sealants and to a lesser extent composites may contribute to low-level BPA exposure, probably through the action of salivary enzymes on a minor ingredient. We see no cause for concern at this time but do look forward to the results of a review of a draft report on BPA safety by an independent NIH panel of endocrinologists, statisticians and biologists. The panel evaluated more than 500 scientific studies and was unable to reach a conclusion so the report isn’t expected to be finalized for at least several weeks. The panel has no regulatory authority, and the findings aren’t binding. We’ve posted a press statement about BPA on ADA.org and will continue to keep the profession informed.

I hope it is helpful,

DR. G

 [ Reply ]
  
  
rena
[ Joined on 03/07 ] [ Posted on August 26, 2007 ]
1 Points        
   
 
Novice User

Hulda Clark (Prevention of all Cancers) writes: HDPE is a safe plastic, which is gallon milk jugs, some gal.water bottles,

some Kefir bottles etc., read all bottoms and save those precious bottles and containers, incl. buckets from the deli.

   Also all ziploc bags are safe and she says that plastic wrap is the worst to touch food.

 [ Reply ]
  
  
PALADIN211
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on August 26, 2007 ]
1 Points        
   
 
Novice User

I'm so glad vodka comes in glass bottles!

 [ Reply ]
  
  
g1
[ Joined on 08/07 ] [ Posted on August 25, 2007 ]
1 Points        
   
 
Novice User

I have a Reverse Osmosis filter (undersink) AND I rent.  In fact this is the second rental property I have been in using one.  You simply have to make a small hole in the sink for the tap, and which you plug with a $10 stainless steel cap when you move out and it looks as good as new.

For good advice, check out this guy: psifilters.com.au (Australian site)

As for plastic in the RO filters, at least you dont also get heavy metals, chlorine, fluorine etc etc as well.....

 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
Kim H
[ Joined on 06/06 ]  [ Posted on August 26, 2007]
       
   
Apprentice User