SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
At Last, New Rules Set for Grass-Fed Meat

Grass-fed meat will soon only be allowed to use the “grass-fed” label if the animals ate nothing but grass after being weaned, according to new standards from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

The grass-fed label is currently unregulated and can be used for animals that were fattened on grains in the final weeks before processing.

The new rules, which take effect November 15, 2007, require that grass-fed animals eat nothing but grass and stored grasses, and have access to pasture during the growing season, which is defined as from last frost to first frost.

However, according to the American Grassfed Association, which represents many raisers of grass-fed animals, the definition of "growing season" means that animals could be confined for long periods, and kept off of pasture even when there is grass growing.

The new rules also do not restrict the use of antibiotics and hormones in the animals.

The American Grassfed Association is planning to set up its own certification system that would require animals to be on pasture year-round, and be free of antibiotics and hormones.

Increasing numbers of people are eating grass-fed meat because they believe it is better for the environment and healthier, with higher levels of omega-3 fats, than meat raised on grains.

Sources:



Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

This is a great step in the right direction, as currently it is virtually impossible to trust that any meat labeled grass-fed is truly fed on pasture year-round. That is, unless you have spoken to the farmer who raised the meat.

However, it is a small step, as the USDA regulatory system has a tendency to favor big business, which can easily afford the USDA’s costly certification fees. Small farmers, who are often raising food in traditional, healthy ways, then are not able to legally call their products “organic” or now “grass-fed” just because they haven’t paid the USDA for the privilege.

While farmers will have to allow the USDA to inspect their farm and records, to use a “U.S.D.A. Process Verified” seal, the new regulations say farmers can still label their meat as grass-fed (without the seal) if they submit documents showing their animals were raised as such. So that may be a way for small farmers to still benefit from the grass-fed label.

Why All the Fuss About Grass-Fed Meat?

Grass-fed beef is vastly superior to grain-fed beef, and in fact it’s the clear beef of choice you should be eating. It is far more important to choose grass-fed than to choose organic, as most grass-fed beef are also organic.

Not only is it raised in a more sustainable way for the environment, and a more humane way for the animal, but it’s the superior choice for your health.

Grass-fed beef, for instance, is lower in fat than regular beef and, more importantly, contains higher amounts of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), a fatty acid. Grass-fed animals have from three to five times more CLA than grain-fed animals.

CLA has been making headlines for its extreme health benefits, which include:
  • Fighting cancer and diabetes
  • Helping you lose weight
  • Increasing your metabolic rate, a positive benefit for promoting normal thyroid function
  • Helping you maintain normal cholesterol and triglyceride levels
  • Enhancing your immune system
Keep in mind that grass-fed meat is almost always preferable to certified organic meat also because most organic beef is fed organic corn, which is what causes the myriad of health problems associated with eating beef. If you can find organic, grass-fed meat, that would be ideal.

Remember, grass-fed meat doesn’t have to be “certified” grass-fed for it to give you health benefits. If you get in touch with a local farmer (try finding a farmer’s market or community-supported agriculture program in your area to do this) who can verify that the products are raised on pasture, without antibiotics and pesticides, you’re likely getting the absolute best meat there is, USDA-certified or not.


Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (35)
 
 
Posted On Oct 22, 2007
As a small farmer that raises grass fed lamb and goat meat and plans to start raising beef soon, I am totally opposed to the USDA regulating the term grass fed.  Eventually, you will have to pay for certification and the small farmer that is truly raising pastured meats will not be able to call their meats grass fed because they won't be able to comply with the costly regulations. The only ones that will remain are the big corporations and they will be able to raise the animals on dirt for half the year, feeding hay instead of corn if they choose to do so, based on the information in the article that you referenced.  Our livestock is on pasture 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.  They do get hay from about January till March, but they are still on pasture and they will eat what still manages to grow. They are not confined to a small area that turns into a muddy mess. They get no antibiotics, hormones or even chemical wormers. We don't use artificial fertilizers, herbicides or pesticides on our land, but the term organic is out of our reach as a small farmer. I'd like to be able to continue to call my animals grass fed without costly government interference.

The term organic is now pretty much meaningless and getting worse by the day.  As a small farmer, it isn't worth the expense and hassle to go through the USDA certification process, so I can't call my produce organic unless I only sell less than $1000 per year.  The organic certification process means small guys lose and big corporations get to take over the market.  The same thing will happen to the term grass fed if the USDA is involved.

 
tammyinmo
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 3/2007
tammyinmo  
Replied

Aaltrude
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 4/2007
Aaltrude  
 
Posted On Oct 22, 2007
I live in New Zealand where dairy cows are grass fed. Our small organic farm is bordered on one side by a dairy farm and the cows are frequently in these paddocks as they are rotated around the farm.

Tammyinmo - I agree with you about the USDA certification. If we notice a product has been USDA certified, we will not buy it. We are also trying to spread the message about the unreliability of this certification as the most powerful way to show that consumers do not trust this certification is to not buy the food.


nmcbride
Novice User Novice User Joined On 1/2007
nmcbride  
 
Posted On Nov 10, 2007

Thank-you for raising your concerns as a farmer. I believe many consumers would like to buy their produce & meats from a farmer whom practices environmentally & socially responsible food production. However, the challenge is, as the consumer which farm follows the above practice? How do we know? In Canada, starting in South Western Ontario, an organization called Local Food Plus (www.LocalFoodPlus.ca) a non-profit group brings farmer & consumers together by its certification process. It's intention is to address you the farmers concerns

improving the connection between small farmers and consumers like myself whom want to support local agriculture, encourage environmental responsibilty and we are willing to pay for it therefore you the farmer has the possibilty of earning more money.

The cost is much less, paperwork much less, freeing up your time to do what you do as the farmer, the certification lets the consumer know we are all on the same page, creating a Win Win situation for both of us, superior product, preserve farmland and grow a stronger local economy.

I encourage you to check it out, www.LocalFoodPlus.ca

We, the consumers want to buy your products that much I know, we want to assist you in every way, we will pay for superior food, we just need to know we can trust what we are buying. I believe LFP is the way to go. It is new as of Sept.06 and everyone can become involved to encourage its growth allowing us all to enjoy real whole alive fresh, seasonal,local, chem-free, non gmo, food!

Naomi McBride


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 20, 2007
Crazy world.....in which more people understand the crucial importance of what we feed animals.....but not it appears, what they consume as a human animal !!
If all animals, including us, only ate what nature designed us to, many health issues would disappear...
...and if we eat animals that have consumed the same kind of bad carbs that compromise our health, then we have the wonderful situation of unhealthy people...eating unhealthy animals. 

 
david
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 8/2006
david  
Replied

shiva
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 10/2006
shiva  
 
Posted On Oct 20, 2007
david - - Well said. This article neglects to explain to the reader that perhaps the main concern that aware consumers have with eating grain fed beef is the fact that the animals are not designed by nature to digest grains. This results in the development of infections in the digestive system and thus the need for anti-biotics. ... The other negative impact of the grain feed is a meat that is higher in unhealthy fat (with the intention of creating a more tender, higher weight and thus more profitable product).. .... All of this is passed on to the body which eats the meat.

 
 
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2007
I guess us folks that live in a rural area are lucky.  We just drive out and meet the farmer and personally pick out the cow.  He takes it to the butcher and we just go pick up the cow cut, frozen and vacuum packed in just the way we choose.  We get about 1/4 in steaks, 1/4 in roasts, 1/4 in hamburger (one pound packages and/or burger patties) and 1/4 in other things (soup bones with lots of meat on them etc).  We also get two boxes of bones that our neighbors's dogs love.  It works out that we pay $2.50 to $3.00 a pound, depending on the cow--not counting all the bones as a bonus.


No antibiotics or hormones and the meat is very tender and better tasting than any supermarket meet.  Even the tough stew meat cuts are tender.  The cows are butchered when they are only about a year old,  just before they would normally be taken to a feed lot.  I sometimes split a cow with one or two other people if someone doesn't want a whole cow at the time.

 
foxtroter_203
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
foxtroter_203  
Replied

foxtroter_203
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
foxtroter_203  
 
Posted On Oct 22, 2007
Islander--Oroville, California--70 miles north of Sacrament.

 
 
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2007
It's nice to see there is a legal definition now that grass fed mean only grass since being weaned in cattle stick. 

HOWEVER, the consumer must remain very cautious of source, and your purchases, from real honest purveyors, lest this turn into another dumbing-down of definitions like 'organic' has become, where more money will be charged even when it is not (it has been reported to me by producer suppliers that Wal Mart, Wholepaycheck and Wild Oats will knowingly relabel and substitute non organic verified produce, when they cannot acquire it, with organic tags to get the extra profit margin).

The solution remains, buy locally at real farmer's markets, if at all possible, where it's fresher anyway and therefore more nutrient rich.

Uncle Russ

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
 
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2007
I always assumed that grass fed meats were kept on pastures all year.  I was not aware of the fact there were no requirements in place to define  grass fed meats.  I knew they might have had antibiotics, but I still think it would be fewer then those kept in a stall most of their life.

Mary

 
mmc88121
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 11/2006
mmc88121  
Replied

tammyinmo
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
tammyinmo  
 
Posted On Oct 23, 2007
The new rule doesn't require that animals be kept on pasture for 365 days a year. The new rules, that were pushed by big corporations that want the ability to call their products grass-fed and don't want truly grass-fed small producers to use the term, allow animals to be in a feed lot environment as long as they are fed hay instead of corn or other substances. This new regulation, that is currently voluntary, will ruin the term grass-fed, just as the USDA ruined the term organic. The small organic farmers can't afford to "buy" the certification and so you cannot legally tell people your food is organically grown unless you sell $1000 per year or less.  Go over $1000 and you are subject to fees and paperwork that would take more than you took in for the year.

 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.