SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Is it Better to Be Fat and Fit Than Skinny and Unfit?

fat, obesity, overweight, weight management, weight loss, skinny, fit, fitness, metabolicIs a person’s weight really a reliable indicator of overall health?

Some medical research is showing that it isn’t. Last week a report in The Archives of Internal Medicine compared weight and cardiovascular risk factors among a representative sample of more than 5,400 adults. Half of the overweight people and one-third of obese people in the study were “metabolically healthy.” That means that many overweight and obese adults may have healthy levels of “good” cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood glucose.

At the same time, about one out of four slim people in the study actually had at least two cardiovascular risk factors typically associated with obesity.

Being overweight or obese is definitely linked with numerous health problems. Nonetheless, researchers found the proportion of overweight and obese people who are metabolically healthy surprising.

Several studies have shown that fitness, as determined by how a person performs on a treadmill, is a far better indicator of health than body mass index. Some research has indicated that people who are fat but can still keep up on treadmill tests have much lower heart risk than people who are slim and unfit.


Sources:

Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Your body is designed to operate best when it’s at an ideal weight, which  varies slightly from person to person. However, carrying around extra pounds will inevitably increase your risk of developing just about every chronic degenerative disease, so the idea that you can be overweight, or even obese, and still be in optimal health, can easily lead you down the wrong path. 

That said, obesity itself is not the underlying cause of any health problem, it is merely a symptom. The underlying cause is usually an unhealthy diet and lack of exercise, which leads to increased insulin and leptin levels. Add to that the strain of unaddressed emotional challenges and you may soon find yourself at an excessive, unhealthy weight, and health challenges can easily develop from there. 

These three factors are present in the majority of people’s lives, which explains why two-thirds of the American population is already overweight. If the trends of the past three decades continue, it’s possible that every American adult could be overweight by 2048!

Although surveys have found that Americans attitudes have shifted drastically toward greater acceptance of heavier body types, which is good, I believe it’s a serious mistake to embrace it as a “new healthy norm.” To do so will only add to this health crisis as excess weight goes hand in hand with so many chronic and debilitating diseases that could easily be avoided.

Is it Possible to Be Healthy and Overweight?

Yes, while  it’s certainly possible to be thin and unhealthy,  there are far more unhealthy overweight people than thin people..

The central issue is insulin and leptin resistance, which is far more common in overweight individuals than thin .  If you are overweight I would be careful about using this study for reassurance unless you recently measured your insulin, leptin and cholesterol levels, and they suggested you were “metabolically fit.” 

I think the health risks of obesity are fairly well-known by now -- obese adults tend to have higher rates of high blood pressure, abnormal lipids, cancer and diabetes. And, making matters worse, the vast majority of people are treated with costly medications that don’t address the real problems but rather cause further deterioration of health.

The side effects alone from all of these medications can overwhelm your system, but even after adjusting for "traditional" risk factors like high blood pressure and high cholesterol levels, obese adults also face increased risks of:

  • Silent vascular disease (blood vessel disease that causes no symptoms)
  • Atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries)
  • Thicker heart walls

Not All Excess Body Fat is Harmful to Your Health

Despite all the health risks associated with being overweight, not all types of body fat represent an inherent health problem.

Researchers have known for some time that fat that collects in your abdomen -- known as visceral fat, which gathers around your internal organs -- can raise your risk of metabolic syndrome, diabetes and heart disease.

However, people with pear-shaped bodies are less prone to these disorders. It seems that their fat may be actively protecting them from metabolic disease.

Recent research has discovered that subcutaneous fat – found just under your skin, which causes dimpling and cellulite -- is intrinsically different from visceral fat in several ways. It actually produces substances that act systemically to improve glucose metabolism, and is able to communicate with various organs to elicit beneficial effects.

Not only is the gene expression inherently different between the two types of fat, but the fats also vary their genetic expressions based on where in the body they’re placed. For example, when the researchers added more subcutaneous fat subcutaneously, there was no major difference in health outcome. But when they placed subcutaneous fat in with visceral fat, in the abdominal cavity, surprising health benefits were seen, such as weight loss and improved metabolic function.

These findings highlight the importance of looking at your body as a WHOLE and not just a collection of separate parts. In order to be optimally healthy, you can’t simply focus on one aspect, such as striving to fit into a size 6. You may be healthy at that size, you might not – depending on how you got there, and how you stay there; i.e. are you exercising, eating healthy, and managing your emotional and mental stress levels, or are you just starving yourself and running on pure adrenaline?

What’s Causing the Obesity Epidemic?

There are a number of theories for why so many people are overweight, but when you start to have entire populations tipping the scales toward obesity, it does suggest that something is fundamentally wrong.

Among the theories that are, in my opinion, most plausible are the following:

1. The modern-day diet: It encourages eating big portions of high-fructose corn syrup, refined grains, processed foods and artificial sweeteners, a perfect recipe for weight gain.

2. Sedentary lifestyles: Generations ago people had no choice but to exercise; they did it for their very livelihoods or at least to get from one place to another. Today, many people sit behind a desk for most of the day, then get in their cars to drive home. Leisure time involves more sitting, either in front of the TV, computer or video game system.

3. Stress and negative emotions: It is very easy to get caught up in using food as a security blanket, a distraction from boredom, or a way to cope with stress -- and once you get used to using food to feel better, it’s hard to break the routine.

4. Exposure to environmental pollutants: Exposure to low levels of pesticides, dyes, flavorings, perfumes, plastics, resins, and solvents may make you put on weight.

5. The make-up of bacteria in your gut: This is related to your diet, but if you eat a lot of sugar and grains, it can negatively influence the bacteria in your gut and contribute to obesity.

6. Lack of sleep: This disrupts vital hormones and proteins in your body, which may also increase your risk of obesity.

I don’t believe that “bad” genes play a major role. Not only has science busted this myth, showing that good nutrition during childhood can cancel out genetic predispositions to obesity, but I’m also a firm proponent of epigenetic medicine and believe our emotions and thoughts have enormous influence over the expression of our genetic code.

Exercise: THE Most Important Factor for Optimal Health and Longevity

Study after study confirms that physical exercise is absolutely the key for disease reduction, optimal mental, emotional and physical health, and longevity. So, it’s not surprising to see that this latest study, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, also found that fitness is a far better indicator of overall health and longevity than body mass index (BMI).  

In conclusion the study reads: 

In this study population, fitness was a significant mortality predictor in older adults, independent of overall or abdominal adiposity. Clinicians should consider the importance of preserving functional capacity by recommending regular physical activity for older individuals, normal-weight and overweight alike.

One of the main benefits of exercise is that it normalizes your insulin and leptin levels, with the secondary benefits of weight loss and normalization of blood sugars. These factors in turn cascade outward, creating a ripple effect of positive health benefits.

For more information about getting started, staying motivated, and reaping maximum results, please review the Exercise Guidelines included in my nutritional plan.

Achieving Your Optimal Weight

Making up your mind to lose weight is half the battle. From there, it’s just a matter of changing your lifestyle in the following ways:

1. Tailor your diet to your nutritional type. These are the foods that are right for your biochemistry, and these are the foods that will push your body toward its ideal weight. (By the way, these foods may be high in fat, high in carbs, heavy on protein or heavy on veggies, it all depends on YOU).

2. View exercise as a drug. When you’re trying to lose weight, a casual walk here and there is not going to cut it. Many studies find that exercising for one hour, five days a week is actually needed, and I tend to agree with that.  There is also strong compelling evidence that strength training and high-intensity anaerobic interval training may be especially effective for weight loss.

3. Let go of your emotional blocks. Tools like the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) are your friend and ally when it comes to losing weight. For some, emotional eating is more complex, and an experienced EFT practitioner may be able to help unravel some of your deeper emotional issues.

If you’re already at a healthy weight, and want to stay that way, cutting out 100 calories per day, either by diet or exercise, is enough to prevent weight gain in most people.



Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (72)
 
 
Posted On Aug 26, 2008
I saw this article the other day and the first t hing that came to my mind was the false levels of cholestrol and blood pressure doctors are scaring their patients with. According to some figures they use now most of us have too high BP and Cholestrol! An example--my best friends mom is 90 years old and for years her dr has tried to get her to take drugs for her so called high cholesterol--she refused as she doesn't like to take drugs, she is thin and still in pretty darn good shape for 90-until recently still went on daily 1 mile walks but has been having some dizzy spells recently, sadly curtailing that. But acording to the markers is not healthy! My friend is also thin and like Mom has high cholestrol--she told her Dr that if her mom can live to 90 with it and still be healthy so can she! Thankfully she has an intelligent Dr who has accepted that she is probably right. And another example of their guidelines being bogus--accordig to standard weight charts my husband is considered over weight while nothing could be further from the truth--he is very fit--barely an ounce of fat on his body! I have heard that muscles weigh more than fat and as he has been training in martial arts he has developed far more of his muculature.I think the test of wether one is healthy is how you feel--can you get up after 8 or so hrs of sleep and have plenty of energy to do what you like doing? Do you have  healthy glowing skin? Do you have regular elimination? Can you breathe easily? can you walk without being out of breath in a few minutes? Are you flexible(physically and mentally)? Are you mostly happy and pain free? I don't suppose any of us feel this good all the time as we have the effects of the environment on us--but it is a good goal to strive for. not worry so much about what our weight or cholestrol are.

 
Debrah
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 11/2006
Debrah  
Replied

Li Kin Dingirama Dari
Novice User Novice User Joined On 3/2008
Li Kin Dingirama Dari  
 
Posted On Sep 12, 2008

Debrah, muscles don't weigh more than fat.  A pound of muscle weighs one pound, as does a pound of fat.  Muscles are more dense than fat, taking up less space, so you can carry more weight in muscle than you can in fat. That's why, when you start weight training and you build muscle, you lose inches, because the denser muscle takes less room and your clothes are no longer tight on you.


 
 
 
Posted On Aug 22, 2008
This wouldn't surprise me. I don't take it as a given that overweight people can't be healthier than thin people, particularly as they age as in the case of women who put on weight after having a few kids and never take it back off. These women may not lose that extra weight, but it doesn't necessarily follow that that weight is going to kill them.

I would take issue with some of the risk indicators no doubt: cholesterol is for the most part a phoney indicator and I wonder about the levels of blood pressure they considered as well. A red flag for me was this line:

"During the test, the treadmill moved at a brisk walking pace as the grade increased each minute. In the study, it didn’t take much to qualify as fit. For men, it meant staying on the treadmill at least 8 minutes; for women, 5.5 minutes. The people who fell below those levels, whether fat or thin, were at highest risk."

If a thin person couldn't pass that easy test, it's no surprise to me at all that they may not be as fit as an overweight person. Despite some reservations, I welcome this study. It acknowledges that you can't just place people in convenient little groupings and expect everyone to follow a set pattern. If it's taken to heart, it may help medicine get away from the evidence based system they've been aiming toward and back perhaps, to the "art" of medicine, using learning, skill, and the individual patient history.

 
Swami Barmi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 10/2006
Swami Barmi  
Replied

PPARGammaGirl
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
PPARGammaGirl  
 
Posted On Aug 22, 2008
Ah but where would science and medicine be without their precious “numbers”? We’ve all been “numberised” in order to create as many fictitious diseases as possible. According to the “numbers” we have deficiencies in statins, bisphosphonates, ARB inhibitors, anxiolytics, antidepressants, hypoglycaemics, antiretrovirals, diuretics, incretin mimetics, PPAR agonists, etc. blah, blah. Oh you might feel perfectly healthy but when doctor death tells you your “numbers” are “bad” then run for the hills as fast as you little legs will carry you.

 
 
 
Posted On Sep 11, 2008

What is causing the obesity epidemic?

Part one.

I have my own theories (and no resources to test them).

I feel the answer is both more complex and also far simpler than believed by most.

A short story....

Quite a few years ago I went on holidays with my husband and young daughter. To his credit, my husband was trying to ensure I had a holiday from the kitchen - but for the first few days all the food we ate was 'fast food' from delicatessens and popular outlets.

Very soon, although my daughter and I were both full - we were also starving for real food.

Theoretically, we should have been well nourished according to the rules of the 'food pyramid', and we were buying fresh apples when we could find them.

So we went to a restaurant with an all you can eat salad bar. And my body said 'THANKS'!

I am ordinarily no fan of salad.

My theory is this - that too many of our foods are chemically pulled apart and recombined and because of it we are missing out on substances which act in synergy in the original food.

Before we started 'refining' foodstuffs we could trust our tastebuds to let us know what was good to eat. We gorged on fruit when it was in season as sweet food was hard to find when fruit was out of season - and there were limited ways to store it without spoiling. We ate the fat on the animals we killed for food because we needed it - and there was originally no way to stop it from spoiling

Fast forwarding to now, we still hunger for both sweet and fatty food -  but they are much more readily available. We still trust our tastebuds to identify good foods - but there are now many more ways to increase the palatability of our foods.

In spite of the fact that many of the foods we eat bear very little resemblance to the original foods they have appealing textures (mouth feel) and there are many many ways to 'gussie up' the flavour.

But our tastebuds have been deceived.


 
Heather Marsh
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 5/2008
Heather Marsh  
Replied

Biggs
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 5/2007
Biggs  
 
Posted On Sep 11, 2008

mineral deficiencies cause cravings so you eat eat & eat trying to satisfy...but there aren't any or very little of the 60 minerals humans need...that's why little kids eat paint off walls, that's why you open the fridge and just stare...that is why pregnant women crave (baby stealing minerals) thats why they sell clay in supermarkets and thats why the snack food industry is boom because salt can fool your body for a while....and that is why obesity is an epidemic (beside food manufactures spiking food with MSG & trans fat...to make you even fatter....



jdowns
Novice User Novice User Joined On 9/2008
jdowns  
 
Posted On Sep 11, 2008

I am one who usually prepares the majority of meals at home for my husband and myself. When I started to have a busy lifestyle at the third month of my pregnancy, I was eating a lot of fast food. - BK, subway, taco bell... I was at class one day, and I felt so physically sick! I told my girlfriend, "I just have to have some real food!!!" She was on it! She had made me a chicken salad. I felt soooo much better. Since then, I have eaten fairly healthy throughout my pregnancy. I have never had those weird cravings that people talk about, and I'm almost 9 months along, now.


 
 
 
Posted On Aug 22, 2008
Metabolically healthy!? 

This type of information is designed to confuse people so they take comfort in their cyclical "consume and earn" lifestyle. 

Of course slim people can be unhealthy.  To tell obese people they are healthy by using purposefully contradictory information is just plain wrong.  In one paragraph they say "metabolically healthy" while in the next they say "Obesity is linked with numerous health problems". 

A good questions may be to ask why newspapers publish this kind of trash.  Would they gain any advantage by confusing us on this and many other issues?  Their customers, the advertisers, sell products.  They need us to buy them.  The more confused we become the more we buy with our emotions rather than our intellect. 




 

 
FunRun
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 7/2008
FunRun  
Replied

leppert
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 2/2006
leppert  
 
Posted On Aug 22, 2008
FunRun, I think you are missing the point here.

If one eats healthy foods and lives a good lifestyle with plenty of exercise then one is probably a lot healthier than the average bear.  My health was incredible, albeit I've been considered overweight my whole life, before I took the diet drug Pfen-fen. 

Although my heart mitral valve is buggered and of course the blood pressure is higher than it should be, I do not have diabetes; lipid, homocystine etc. are really good, if not too low, and haven't had a cold or flu in over 20 years.  I exercise rigorously daily and eat right for my type.  I weigh over 20 lbs less now than I did in '96 when I took the diet drug.

The scale does not tell all.


FunRun
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 7/2008
FunRun  
 
Posted On Aug 22, 2008
leppert, it makes me sad when I see issues phrased in this way. 

Are uranium crackers better than a pesticide sandwich?  Neither are good.  To offer just these two options, healthy-fat or unhealthy-slim, sets people up for failure.  And yes, both are failure.  By hiding the most logical option, healthy-slim, the writer is tacitly telling the reader that nobody can really achieve that ideal. 

And that ideal, I would imagine, is what caused you to choose Pfen fen as a way to lose weight.  The focus on quick and easy weight-loss damaged your health.  I wish for you, and for the tens of thousands like you, that it was not the case. 

Most people in the world maintain a healthy, slim weight throughout their life.  It is the default position for humans.  Obesity and anorexia are the extremes. 

This article is one tiny example of how small, medium and large are slowly being redefined by organizations and companies that have a vested interest in getting us to choose the large.  I do not wish to be healthier than the average bear.  I wish to be healthy, period.


 


KelleyEidem
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 11/2007
KelleyEidem  
 
Posted On Sep 11, 2008

You're so right.

The article was just a cute way to point out we need to be more than just the right weight. But it left out the elephant in the room...it's best to be fit and not fat.

Dr. Mercola's advice is right on. There's one more thing that has a major effect on our collective tubbiness. It's yeast overgrowth. One study found that 70% of Americans have that problem - both men and women.

Thank goodness, it is possible to get the yeast under control. Here's how I did it. (I'm not selling anything):

hubpages.com/.../How-to-Flatten-Your-Tummy-and-End-Food-Cravings-EFFORTLESSLY

The best to you.

Kelley Eidem



potter1958
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
potter1958  
 
Posted On Sep 11, 2008

Leppert, in my opinion, is more correct than you, FunRun.  I've been overweight my entire life.  Yet at 50 years old, I still play recreational basketball, dead lift 455 pounds, do four sets of five repetitions of power cleans with 205 pounds, etc.  The doctors I have seen through my years for physicals usually say I am one of the fittest patients they have seen, according to their tests.  They add, "You might want to lose some weight for your looks only."

Sure, I'd love to be built like an NBA player, but I also like to eat...crap!  Therefore, I know its my own doing.

All this article was saying is there are guys like me that are in better shape than people skinier than me.


 
 
 
Posted On Sep 11, 2008

Can one   be fit and fat, or unfit and slim? Obviously YES. Logically  there  are more fat and  unfit, than thin and fit. However FIT does NOT  correlate with health, or unfit with poor health. Examples. In 1978 I attended a Fitness Conference in Hawaii. The local papers then reported  a 28 year old competitive marathon runner had just died of a heart attack. One of his coronary  arteries was already blocked, and one then  blocked  to cause his death. Probably he was on a low fat, no supplement diet as was, and still is the rage of all registered dieticians, trainers, and medics. He would have had a high level of any of the 3 main  heart  disease causing factors.  1. homocysteine,  (reduced with vitamins B6,B12, and folic acid)  2.  tri-glycerides , (high carbohydrate/sugar/alcohol intake) and 3. lipo-protein alpha, (reduced by Vitamin C)   The dead marathon runner was fit and slim.  My dad was obese round the waist all his life, a heavy smoker till 92, occasionally slowly doing 5 minutes  on a stationary bike. He lived to 97. His arteries were clean due to his lifelong high vitamin C intake. As a Hungarian, every main meal had a large plate of fresh green peppers to finish off. He had greasy meals with loads of butter, (synthesising Vitamin B6 thru the good intestinal bacteria, reducing homocysteine)  He had little  sugar or alcohol,  (low  tri-.glycerides). He was fat and unfit.  These two extreme examples show  health and fitness dont  always  correlate, ie fit does not necassarily mean healthy, and unfit does not always mean unhealthy.  Even with previous heart protection omissions, arteries can still naturally be cleaned out with EDTA, anally, oraly or on a drip. Next.for health comes cancer prevention, a 2007 science  through drclark.com, For diabetes prevention and cure, Mercola the leader, and so on..So, irrespective of whether you can run a marathon, or just occasionally sit on a stationary bike and slowly pedal, there are other factors to consider.


 
ThomasT
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 6/2006
ThomasT  
Replied

Heather Marsh
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 5/2008
Heather Marsh  
 
Posted On Nov 11, 2008

please elucidate/clarify  EDTA

Thank you


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.