FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
May 07 2003
624 Views

BROWSE BY CATEGORY

Sugar Industry Has Major Conflict With Health Report--Imagine That

 

FAO and the World Health Organization (WHO) developed a joint report on diet to address the increasing problem of chronic diseases worldwide and develop a strategy to combat the problem.

The report contains scientific evidence on the relationship of diet, nutrition and physical activity to chronic diseases and examines cardiovascular diseases, several forms of cancer, diabetes, obesity, osteoporosis and dental disease.

A diet low in saturated fat, sugars and salt and high in vegetables and fruit, and regular physical activity, will help to combat chronic disease, according to the report.

Chronic diseases are rapidly increasing. In 2001, about 59 percent of total deaths worldwide were due to chronic diseases, which make up 46 percent of diseases globally.

Globally, the increasing intake of high-calorie, low-nutrition foods, increasingly inactive lifestyles, and other factors such as tobacco use, are the leading causes of the increasing incidence of chronic disease, according to report authors.

Cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancers and obesity, which were once associated with "rich countries," are now facing developing countries as well. Solutions to the increasing burden of such diseases require stronger relationships between those involved in health and agriculture from regional to global levels, according to the report.

The authors note that even modest, population-wide changes in diet and physical activity can produce significant changes to the overall burden of chronic disease in a short time period.

The report's recommendations include:

  • Fat intake should only be between 15 percent and 30 percent of total daily energy intake, saturated fats less than 10 percent

  • Carbohydrate intake should be between 55 percent and 75 percent of daily intake
    Added sugars should be less than 10 percent of daily intake

  • Daily intake of salt, which should be iodized, should be less than 5 grams a day

  • Intake of fruit and vegetables should be at least 400 grams a day

  • Protein should account for 10 percent to 15 percent of total daily intake

  • Moderate-intensity activity for one hour each day, for most days of the week, is needed to maintain a healthy body weight

WHO will be meeting with a number of major food and beverage companies, which authors say is critical to developing a long-term solution. In order to create an environment where healthy choices are easy, major changes in consumer information, labeling, trade and agricultural production and processing methods will need to be made.

Authors noted that long-term progress will likely take time, but could lead to a major positive shift in worldwide health.

Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations April 23, 2003



Dr. Mercola Dr. Mercola's Comments:

This is an absolutely amazing report, not so much in that it confirms what any rational person knows, that sugar intake should be limited, but in how irrational the food industry really is.

The U.S. Soft Drink Association has already come out against this report, which concluded that sweetened drinks contribute to obesity, and is seeking to convince the government and public that we should not limit our sugar intake to less than 10 percent of our daily energy intake.

Now the U.S.-based Sugar Association is trying to get the report withdrawn (along with six other major food industry groups including the U.S. Council for International Business, of which Coca-Cola and Pepsico are a part), saying that up to 25 percent of our daily intake can come from sugar.

The sugar industry is threatening to lobby Congress to cut off WHO’s funding unless they withdraw their report. Not surprisingly, the sugar industry is a major player in U.S. politics--the sugar industry gave more than $3 million in donations in the 2002 federal elections.

The sugar industry’s attempts to have the report withdrawn are similar to the tobacco industry seeking to convince us that it is OK for 10 percent of the country to smoke even though 25 percent of it does.

The solution for both scenarios, whether it be sugar use or tobacco use, is clear. Ideally, consumption would be close to zero for both disease-producing, health-robbing influences.

However, as many already know, it is my strong clinical impression that sugar is far more damaging to health than cigarettes. There are a wealth of studies, as well as much clinical evidence, to support this surprising conclusion, and this has been my observation over the last 20 years. You can also review the links below for further evidence.

One of the most potent clinical examples I can share of sugar’s obvious influence on your immune system comes from experiments done 50 years ago with rabbits. Researchers repeatedly tried to infect rabbits with polio but were unsuccessful until they lowered the rabbits' blood sugar levels with insulin injections, which likely crippled the rabbits’ immune systems and allowed them to contract polio.

Along these lines, eating sugar leads to periods of low blood sugar levels in humans. Similar responses to sugar were noted in the United States in the pre-polio vaccine era when certain communities realized that the polio incidence increased in the summer when large amounts of ice cream were consumed.

Once the communities rallied and convinced the people to reduce their sugar consumption there were dramatic reductions in the incidence of polio in their local communities.

Vaccines are not the ultimate solution to prevent disease. But, limiting sugar is one of the most potent actions you can take to improve your physical health.

If you are going to eat sugar, the absolute worst time to have it is while you are sick. If you are doing well emotionally, sleeping well and have no acute or chronic health problems, then consuming small amounts of sugar is not likely to cause a major problem.

You can further reduce the negative influences of sugar by consuming it immediately after an intensive cardiovascular workout like running or aerobics. The sugar will tend to be used very quickly and not be as likely to cause insulin disruptions.

It is also important to realize that you needn’t have iron willpower and resist sugar with Herculean efforts of self-control. If you are eating a balanced diet according to your Metabolic Type then it is unlikely you will have any physical cravings, but emotional cravings may still exist. Tools like Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) can be useful in this area.

But, typically, once you are balanced with your Metabolic Type the cravings will disappear. In fact, if you still have cravings this is a major clue that your diet needs to be modified so the cravings disappear.

This is one of the major reasons why I have really embraced nutritional typing: because it has to work for the person. If the program doesn’t work, it is continuously adjusted until symptoms improve.

Related Articles:

American Cancer Society Now Believes Obesity is as Dangerous as Smoking

78 Ways That Sugar Can Destroy Your Health

Dangers of Sugar

Sugar Increases Polio Risk

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 0 )
Comment on this Article

 
Truste
 
Mercola