SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
Uh-Oh: FDA Now Calls Stevia Unsafe

The South American herb stevia, which is used as a natural sweetener, has been called an “unsafe food additive” by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The FDA sent a letter to Hain Celestial Group Inc, maker of Celestial Seasonings herbal teas, saying the stevia used in some of their teas may be dangerous to blood sugar and reproductive, cardiovascular, and renal systems.

Stevia is several hundred times sweeter than sugar, and has no calories. Though it’s approved as a dietary supplement in the United States, it is not approved as a food additive. A dozen other countries, including Japan, China, and Brazil, have approved the sweetener however.

Beverage giants including Coca-Cola Co. are eyeing stevia as a new low-calorie sweetener, but while the FDA has received requests to use stevia in food, they say "data and information necessary to support the safe use have been lacking."

The Center for Science in the Public Interest also believes that data is lacking to support the safety of stevia in food.

Coca-Cola and Cargill Inc. are working to prove the safety of the herb, but in the meantime, Hain plans to change their stevia-containing teas’ labels to state that they are supplements, not foods.

Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Warning Letter August 17, 2007

Reuters September 18, 2007



Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Stevia is a non-caloric herb native to Paraguay that has been used as a sweetener for over 1,500 years in South America. If anyone is doubting its safety, I would encourage them to consider that fact; it is a MAJOR clue that stevia is safe.

Stevia has also been used in Japan since the early 1970s to sweeten pickles and other foods.

In the United States, however, the FDA has turned down at least three industry requests to use stevia in foods.

Please understand that Japan is not encumbered by the same conflicts of interest as the United States, and most of their research is not directly financed or greatly influenced by the very industry that is seeking to promote a product. So in this environment stevia has proven to be safe.

What is ironic, of course, is that while the FDA is scrutinizing this naturally sweet herb, they maintain a historically generous attitude toward synthetic chemical sweeteners like aspartame and sucralose.

To use stevia as a commercial food additive would require years of testing. Even though this sweetener has passed the test of time, it is viewed as dangerous until proven otherwise.

Not so with the big-name artificial sweeteners on the market; they are innocent until proven guilty.

In the United States, stevia has been the subject of searches and seizures, trade complaints, and embargoes on importation. Many believe that the FDA’s actions regarding stevia are nothing more than a restraint to trade designed to benefit the artificial sweetener industry.

Stevia is not the only natural sweetener that is being unfairly targeted by the FDA. A pair of entrepreneurs tried unsuccessfully to create a natural sweetener based on a West African berry called Synsepalum Dulcificum, for instance.

However, in 1974 the FDA ruled that their natural product was a food additive that needed years of testing before it could be used commercially. Now here’s the kicker: that very same year, the FDA approved the dangerous artificial sweetener aspartame.

Is Stevia Safe for Everyone?

Unlike aspartame and other artificial sweeteners that have been cited for dangerous toxicities, stevia is a safe, natural alternative that's ideal for those watching their weight and anyone interested in maintaining their health by avoiding sugar.

Some don’t like its taste, but other than that it is nearly the ideal sweetener.

It is hundreds of times sweeter than sugar and truly has virtually no calories -- unlike the lies and deceptions with regular artificial sweeteners, which are loaded with other sugars to make them flow better.

I want to emphasize, however, that if you have insulin issues, I suggest that you avoid sweeteners altogether (including stevia), as they all can decrease your sensitivity to insulin. So if you struggle with high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, or extra weight then you have insulin sensitivity issues and would benefit from avoiding sweeteners.

But for everyone else, if you are going to sweeten your foods and beverages anyway, I strongly encourage you to consider using stevia.

Stevia can be used in appetizers, beverages, soups, salads, vegetables, desserts -- virtually anything! It is, hands down, the best alternative to sugar you will ever taste.

You Want to Know Something REALLY Interesting?

Re-read my recommendation on stevia in the preceding paragraph and realize that if I sold stevia on my site I would be in direct violation of the “law,” which specifically restricts anyone from making ANY claim on the use of stevia as a sweetener. Since I don’t sell it, I can tell you what I believe.

It truly is amazing how the food industry has manipulated and distorted the laws to serve THEIR purposes -- not for your protection or benefit.

If you are a protein or mixed nutritional type, be sure to check out Luci Lock’s video on how to make a “yummy scrummy” cream soda using stevia and other nutritious ingredients.

Finally, if you would like to know more about the startling truth surrounding artificial sweeteners -- and why I don’t recommend them -- I encourage you to read my book Sweet Deception.


Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (102)
 
 
Posted On Sep 19, 2007

Yet even more humor from the FDA and the media, who seem to have forgotten that a journalist‘s role is to DIG, not parrot.

The FDA says that stevia can‘t be used as a food additive because it "might be dangerous to blood sugar, reproductive, cardiovascular and renal systems", based on some mysteriously absent "literature reports [that] have raised safety concerns". According to the same FDA however, it‘s a-okay to use it as a dietary supplement:
 
"Boulder, Colorado-based Hain said in a statement the FDA agreed that the company could change the products‘ labels to reflect that they are supplements and not food."

I‘m far too stupid to wonder why it‘s fine when called one thing, yet potentially a destructive, nation-flattening weapon when used as a cheap, abundant sweetener that would coincidentally compete with the safe-as-mother‘s-milk health chemicals like Splenda and Aspartame.

No wonder "Angeln FDA spokeswoman was not available for further comment." The only way she could feel more ridiculous is if she had the words "Useful Idiot" tattooed on her forhead. I‘ll bet the job of White House press secretary is looking pretty good to her right about now.

Of course, where would the story be without the jack-booted kick -- er, concerned input -- from the vegetarians at the Center for Science in the Public Interest which "believes there is not enough data to support the safety of stevia in food"? Wouldn‘t centuries of harmless use qualify it as GRAS ?


 
Swami Barmi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 10/2006
Swami Barmi  
Replied

Katee Roux
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 7/2007
Katee Roux  
 
Posted On Sep 19, 2007
Yes well said.

This is ridiculous when other, FDA approved, dangerous sweetners are commonly used, & this one is pointed to as "not know to be safe."


Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
 
Posted On Sep 19, 2007
We need Dr. David Graham to run FDA, and clean house...but first get the good Doctor & true American Hero some body armor and some body guards.


KathieJamisonCote
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
KathieJamisonCote  
 
Posted On Sep 20, 2007
Well said Swami!

ON NO - what will Cargill and Coca-Cola do?  They've just decided to start a stevia product of their own.............slimy copycats - they just see the $$ and what a more health conscious public means to their deep pockets......I would imagine with these two companies wanting to use stevia - it won't be long before this FDA thing is forgotten history, brushed under rug and the FDA changes their stance. 
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_6356.cfm


BeyondOrganic
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
BeyondOrganic  
 
Posted On Sep 20, 2007
Ditto!  Such a joke how nutra-sweet, splenda, aspartame, sweet and low and all of the chemical formaldehyde in your brain formations are all FDA approved.  FDA= F _ _ _ _ _ _  Dumb As_ es!!!!!
Excuse my French. but they make me very, very angry!!!!!


Magnolia
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
Magnolia  
 
Posted On Sep 21, 2007
Swami, that was a succinct, comprehensive, and humorous comment. Thanks!


MitaP
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2007
MitaP  
 
Posted On Oct 02, 2007

It seems a little hypocritical to claim not enough data to call the herb safe but there's enough data to claim it is dangerous... which is it, not enough data or enough? You have to have plenty of actual data from reliable scientific sources in order to make such a determination. I would think that there would be some sort of documentation that you could recover using the Freedom Of Information Act. Anybody up for that?

(Who also wants to wager on what the source of the literature is... manufacturers of aspartame, perhaps?)

I don't even like the taste and I am going to go buy A HUGE BAG right now just to spite the FDA. And I CAN get it in bulk sizes.



2shiny
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
2shiny  
 
Posted On Oct 02, 2007

Stevia is heavily used in Japan ~ we all know the drill when it comes to the FDA.



John Legate
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2006
John Legate  
 
Posted On Oct 02, 2007

I too would like to encourage Dr. Mercola to write an article on xylitol.  I've read some astounding health benefits for this natural sugar substitute, such as the descriptions given on these sites:

en.wikipedia.org/.../Xylitol

www.angelfire.com/.../xylitol_natural_sweetener.html


 
 
 
Posted On Sep 19, 2007
Stevia was banned in the United States so that NutraSweet would have no competition and finally allowed back on the market in the late 90s as a "supplement" but could not be called a sweetener.  The local WalMart was selling Stevia packets right alongside Splenda and it disappeared.  I went and looked in supplement section and it's gone from the store.  Period.  I'm wondering if this is the FDAs first step in banning STEVIA again as it has a rapidly growing number of users.  I personally have gotten at least 5 people I know to switch from Splenda to Stevia.  I VERY AFRAID of where this may be heading.  Or...is there a patent in the works for some molecule derived from stevia, synthesized and processed into poison?

 
Patty D
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2007
Patty D  
Replied

KathieJamisonCote
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 4/2007
KathieJamisonCote  
 
Posted On Sep 20, 2007
sweeteners made from GMO'd Sugar Beets (Round-up Ready, yes the chemcial pesticide) are on the list for the next greatest sweetener farce.

..........direct from the article "After abandoning genetically modified sugar beets in the late 1990s, the US sugar beet industry is set to re-introduce GM Roundup Ready sugar beets."
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_4494.cfm


Kaelisabeth
Novice User Novice User Joined On 7/2007
Kaelisabeth  
 
Posted On Oct 02, 2007

Frauds Decieveing America are considering to take away my right to have Stevia when everyone else can consume Sucralose, Aspartame, that huge "Ph" word that Equal is made out of, Partially Hydrogenators, Shortening, High Fricken' Crap Syrup, and other ingriedients that only God knows what...????

Soon anyone can read any book they want...c'ept the Holy Bible...

Better memorize some more scripture while I can...



Ridershrink
Novice User Novice User Joined On 11/2006
Ridershrink  
 
Posted On Oct 02, 2007

John, Xylitol is not all benefit and often includes undesirable side effects such as diarrhea even in small amounts.


 
 
 
Posted On Sep 19, 2007
So it's "SAFE" for Cargill & Coke to petition for an exclusive patents on stevia, for monopolization, in food and beverage, but "unsafe", for anyone else to use stevia...?!

And known and completely chemically synthesized, and CANCER CAUSING AT ANY INGESTION LEVEL Sucralose (Splenda Brand) is "approved for general use"?!

Read Dr. Mercola's SWEET DECEPTION.

FDA = Fraud Deceit Always.

 
Russ Bianchi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 9/2006
Russ Bianchi  
Replied

corganic
Novice User Novice User Joined On 11/2006
corganic  
 
Posted On Sep 20, 2007
Exactly, just when big business figures out how to patent a form of stevia, the government bans stevia.

Coincidence? Or revolving doors?


keepingfit
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
keepingfit  
 
Posted On Oct 02, 2007

Also make that:  FDA = Fraudulent Deceitful Asses



cmcgov
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
cmcgov  
 
Posted On Oct 02, 2007

FDA - Fatal Drug Approvers or Fraud and Death Association. Can't decide which fits better...


 
 
 
Posted On Sep 20, 2007
You've all said it better than I could.  I am glad I live in Japan and have a big organic field with my own stevia.  My husband's diabetes is much much better as he has discovered what works for him, and stevia helps him enjoy a few items like ice cream he would otherwise have to avoid.

I am going off topic now:  I have been silenced somehow on this site, and this might be my last chance to say something here.  I have not been able to participate much lately because I am somehow blocked.  Has anyone else here had this trouble?  I would get a message saying I needed to sign in, but discover I was already signed in.  When this occurred on my MacIntosh, I assumed it was a Mac-Vital Votes interface problem.  But then it also occurred on my husband's Windows computer, right after I posted on the topic of biological effects of electromagnetic fields and noticed someone docking two points from everyone else posting on the topic.  Recently I was able only to post in reply (but not start a thread) on my MacIntosh.  On September 17, I got a message from the Vital Votes moderator saying I had been banned from this site for spamming.  When I inquired, I got a reply saying I should not have received such a message and that I could still participate.  I am happy to be able to participate today.  I also note that I have lost status repeatedly here.  I understand because of stronger participation they had to raise the standards, but I can't help but think I've also been targetted for harassment by someone for some reason.  I hear hackers are capable of amazing things.  I also know there has been a major, coordinated attack on EMF activists recently because of our successes in breaking through the media blackout on the topic, especially in Europe.  (See www.bioinitiative.com and you'll understand why.)

 
Pat Ormsby
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
Pat Ormsby  
Replied

Pat Ormsby
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2006
Pat Ormsby  
 
Posted On Oct 02, 2007

Dear Islander,  I've noticed your messages recently replaced by a foul message about harassment which has nothing to do with the intelligent replies below it, giving me a clue as to what you said before the switcheroo.  Others' posts have also been clearly replaced by other messages.  Nonetheless, I thank whoever is doing this, actually, for making it clear that a switch has been made.  What is really scary is the thought that someone could come in and change a person's message in subtle ways.  There could be people "implicating themselves" on this site, and who would know?  Recently, I have only been able to post replies, and only from my Mac.  But I have not noticed anyone's replies being altered yet, so this may be a safer avenue for participation.  Still, it would be good for everyone here to keep in mind that So-and-so may not have actually said such-and-such.



Patty D
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 6/2007
Patty D  
 
Posted On Oct 03, 2007

Pat, just an FYI.  They ARE editing posts, not just deleting.  The other day I had the audacity to mention prayer and that PART of my post was removed.



Christian Ryan D.O.
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 8/2006
Christian Ryan D.O.  
 
Posted On Oct 04, 2007

Pat I have been a loyal fan of Dr Mercola for years.I know that the agencies of the govt.ie: FDA USDA Homeland Security have now demanded of all sites servers and internet providers a physical jack or interface where they can monitor and log all conversations. Perhaps some of you spammed replys and I cant imagine how u would change someone elses comment unless u were an spammer or hacker delux.If you stray or get into non health related comversations you may have been blocked for that. I suggest you go back and read the TOS of this site and you will find your answer there .Dr. Christian Ryan DO



Cassy
Novice User Novice User Joined On 9/2007
Cassy  
 
Posted On Oct 04, 2007

Islander, I seldom participate in this forum, I usually only read comments by others. A couple of times I have questioned the workings of the point system, only to have my post deleted almost immediately.  I have always enjoyed your comments and was saddened when I saw that you had been deactivated.  Welcome back......is it possible for you to tell us the name of the other health site that you mentioned.  If not here, perhaps in an email.  I am cassy-brown   at    hotmail dot com....(hopefully that will stop auto email) Occasionally you disagree with the status quo, instead of parroting what others have said.....good for you! Thanks for your response.


 
 
 
Posted On Sep 19, 2007
Stevia's dangerous and sugar, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Aspartame, and sucralose are all completely safe? Figures...

 
ChiroTom5
Apprentice User Apprentice User, Joined On 3/2007
ChiroTom5  
 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.