FREE Subscription
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter   
 
 
POSTED BY
March 29 2008
Radical New Gas Alternative That Your Kids Will be Using

hydrogen, H2, alternative fuel, renewable energy, fuel, green energyBy Darshan Goswami, M.S., P.E.

Hydrogen, produced from tap water, could become the forever fuel of the future, generating power for homes, industry, and cars.

A new day is dawning for a revolutionary way to generate electric power from renewable energy sources. Imagine a future where the electrical power needed to run your computer, TV and DVD is generated from a small appliance about the size of a dishwasher located in your home. Envision generating electricity without combustion, and producing heat and pure drinking water as by-products.

Picture a world powered almost entirely by an infinitely abundant and totally clean fuel. Hydrogen, the most common element in the universe, is that fuel, which can be produced from tap water to generate power for homes and cars.

Imagine being able to drive your car more than 500 miles between fill-ups. The car you drive could become a “power station on wheels” producing about 30 to 50 kilowatts of electricity. At work the parked car in the parking lot could be making money for you by supplying energy to the power grid during peak hours. The same fuel cells in the car parked in your garage could provide power for your home use.

In the new age of hydrogen, each individual could become the producer as well as the consumer of energy. Automobile, oil, and utility companies are spending billions to make this dream come true.

Renewable Energy Source

Hydrogen is “a renewable, versatile, simple sustainable domestic energy” and there is no danger of running out of hydrogen because it is the most abundant element in the universe. Hydrogen can be produced through a thermal, electrolytic, or photolytic process from fossil fuels, biomass, or water. Renewable and nuclear systems can produce hydrogen from water using a thermal or electrolytic process. People can even produce it in their homes with relatively simple apparatus.

The Hydrogen Economy is the term used to mark the shift from fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas to hydrogen. The vision of a Hydrogen Economy is one of an unlimited source of fuel that would be used to generate energy without releasing carbon and other pollutants into the air.

Hydrogen has the potential to do for the energy revolution what the computer and the Internet have done for the information revolution. Fuel cells are considered the “microchip of the hydrogen age,” the key to abundant energy from secure, renewable resources. Ultimately, fuel cells supplying homes, businesses, and industries could be linked to a national power grid allowing surplus power at one location to be transferred to areas experiencing power shortages.

Hydrocarbon Economy

Today, we have a “hydrocarbon economy” but the transition toward a “Hydrogen Economy” has already begun. In the very near future we will have weaned ourselves from carbon and we will live in a “Hydrogen Economy” powered by hydrogen energy from renewable resources. You will have access to hydrogen energy to the same extent that they now have access to petroleum, natural gas, and electric power.

Some cities, such as Chicago and Vancouver, already have buses powered by hydrogen fuel cells. Ford, GM, BMW, Toyota, and Honda have prototype cars powered by hydrogen. Ford chairman William Clay Ford Jr. has declared that the fuel cell will “finally end the 100-year reign of the internal-combustion engine.” Such efforts are leading the world toward the “Hydrogen Economy.”

The present fossil fuel economy has created significant environmental problems worldwide. The Hydrogen Economy promises to eliminate all of the problems created by the fossil fuel economy. The advantages of the Hydrogen Economy include greater fuel efficiency, elimination of pollution caused by fossil fuels, elimination of greenhouse gases, and elimination of economic dependence on Middle East oil reserves.

Good for Developing Countries

Specifically, the Hydrogen Economy may be even more beneficial to developing countries because it will generate more economic opportunities, reduce poverty and offer a dramatically cleaner renewable resource to bypass at least part of the expense of building a fossil fuel infrastructure.

The Hydrogen Economy could produce total decentralization of the global energy market controlled by giant oil companies and utilities, and result in vast redistribution of wealth and power. In a Hydrogen Economy utility companies will become obsolete.

The Hydrogen Economic revolution must overcome major challenges in regard to the safe production, storage and transportation of hydrogen, and in developing new sensor technology.

“World Hydrogen Energy Roadmap” must be developed to address hydrogen production, delivery and transportation, storage, conversion, public-private partnerships, research, codes and standards, testing, public education, and end use products. This effort must include government, industry, universities, and research laboratories.

Government subsidies and tax incentives could be used to encourage put the Hydrogen Economy on a fast track. The goal of the program should be to develop technologies to safely produce, store and transport hydrogen from water, nature’s abundant and virtually free source of hydrogen.

New Energy Revolution

Hydrogen has the potential to do for the energy revolution what the computer and the Internet have done for the information revolution. Global reliance on Middle East oil will come to an end and international trade balances will be realigned. Fuel cells are a “critical technology” that will bring a total revolution in the energy sector and change the course of history. President Bush has referred to fuel cells as the “wave of the future” and called for a “focused effort to bring fuel cells to market.”

The ultimate goal is to use the renewable energy of the sun to split water into its basic components of oxygen and hydrogen.

The Hydrogen Economy would open the doors for fundamental changes in our economic, political, and social institutions, similar to the impact of steam power at the beginning of the “Industrial Age.” The giant oil companies are investing heavily in a hydrogen future to control the design, production, and sales of the devices that produce and consume hydrogen. Fuel companies like Shell, BP, and Texaco are forming hydrogen and fuel cell technology divisions.

The Hydrogen Economy is a bright vision for the future of energy that will revolutionize the world by reducing our reliance for oil from Middle Eastern countries. I envision hydrogen as the power generation fuel of the future that will wean the world away from oil, slow global warming, and lift billions out of poverty. If significant progress is desired, government and private partnerships must be established to concentrate development efforts. A “Manhattan Hydrogen Project” is needed to ensure the Hydrogen Economy vision becomes a reality soon.

About the Author: Darshan Goswami has over 35 years of experience in the energy field. Until recently, he was the Chief of Energy Forecasting and Renewable Energy at the Rural Development, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in Washington, DC. Earlier, he worked for 30 years at Duquesne Light, an electric utility company in Pittsburgh, PA.



Dr. MercolaDr. Mercola's Comments:

There are many renewable energy source alternatives out there and plenty of technical innovations are cropping up, increasing our potential to replace our reliance on both oil and fossil fuels.  

It wasn’t all that long ago that the idea of making a car that could run on, say, AIR, seemed completely preposterous. But guess what? It’s available. NOW!  

The Air Car, by Moteur Developement Int. runs on compressed air technology.

According to a January article in the MIT publication Technology Review, the Air Car is set to go into commercial production as early as this summer, and MDI has struck a deal with India’s largest carmaker, Tata Motors, to put the non-polluting vehicles on the streets of India later this year. 

We are simply running out of excuses for not converting to safer, renewable energy sources that don’t turn the Earth into a toxic waste dump with every light we turn on and every mile we drive.

Harnessing the energy of the sun is now also a very cost effective alternative for homes and other buildings. The award winning Nanosolar Company announced on their website that they shipped their first commercial order in December 2007. And since their breakthrough solar coating is produced at an 80 percent reduced cost from previous years, it should make them a serious contender for consumer dollars.

My new office building, constructed for my practice and web team, will have solar power, and it seems obvious to me that this technology will allow us to not only radically lower our utility bills, but do it without polluting our environment.   

We have to stop this unnecessary reliance on oil and fossil fuels, and we’re starting to see some very viable, exciting options.


Related Articles:

Did you find this article interesting?  Interesting Not Useful
Community Comments ( 170 )
Comment on this Article
  
  
Dekalb
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on March 10, 2008 ]
45 Points        
   
 
Apprentice User
Might as well use the tap water for something since it's not fit to drink.
 [ Reply ]
Mercola
  
healthiswealth
[ Joined on 07/07 ]  [ Posted on March 28, 2008]
6 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

Guys, there is technology RIGHT NOW to double fuel economy, which would eliminate our dependence on foreign oil. This would be a huge shot in the arm to our economy. They are just having trouble getting it out there due to lack of funding, and a lack of infrastructure of trained mechanics that can do the conversions. Check it out here www.preignitioncc.com/pm

And on roughly the same topic, people don't think of laundry detergents at petrochemicals usually, but they are. Detergents are derived almost totally from crude oil, which is why the price has been going up so much lately. Gas might cost $3.50 per gallon, but detergent has gone up to $13 per gallon! And these petrochemicals are imbued in our clothes and on our skin all day long. I found the "hydrogen fuel cell" of the laundry industry, which happens to be out right now: http://www.magneticlaundry.com

I can say after some strong initial skepticism that this is the real deal. If everybody used this thing, maybe gas prices would come down, because EVERYBODY is using these petrochemicals in their washing machines every day. God only knows what it is doing to our water supply.

Mercola
  
ne_plus_ultra_1
[ Joined on 09/06 ]  [ Posted on March 29, 2008]
5 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

Heh, tap water.  Love the comment.

OK, down to business, "laundry balls" might work well.  I can buy that one.  I use magnetic "water softener" with great results i.e. soap actually "suds" now.

PICC or pre-ignition-catalytic-converter, is bogus according to my (considerable) knowledge AT LEAST without additional significant modifications.  There is VERY little unexpended fuel that gets to the Cat in modern engines.  

I CANNOT ATTACK THE THEORY ANY FURTHER THAN THAT.  I CAN ADD HOW CARS ACTUALLY WORK HOWEVER.

In a carburetor, gas is sucked into the engine through little holes, already drilled or otherwise metered.  I do not want to go into unnecessary details but the holes are drilled or the flow is already otherwise metered.  The only gain would come by pushing the pedal LESS and then THAT is very limited because you'd get into the inefficient "idle circuit".  Very limited gain possible 10X is simply impossible.

People would be creating 1000 horsepower with these devices in their family sedans if it were possible.  Believe it when you see it with you own eyes.

In a fuel injected car (very different from carbureted), gas is squirted in at relatively high pressure according to how long the computer tells the injector to turn on which was determined by SENSOR DATA.  The main sensors in an average car would be (to make it easy) air flow, air temp, engine coolant temp, RPM, MPH, gear, perceived load calculations, throttle position, etc...  I AM abridging this a bit.

The fuel injector is simply not designed to squirt 1/10th of it's optimal capacity in an efficient manner.  In most engines this would produce almost instantly an error code that would illuminate your MIL (Malfunction Indicator Light) also known to the general populous as the "Check Engine Light".  Fuel injectors being asked to deliver LESS or MORE than the programming parameters turn on the MIL light, period.

I know that alternative energy is around the corner.  Please don't dismiss me as a skeptic

Mercola
  
healthiswealth
[ Joined on 07/07 ]  [ Posted on March 29, 2008]
10 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

To reply to ne_plus_ultra_1, the answer is that the modern vehicle is totally inefficient by design. Less than 30% of the fuel in your tank is used as energy. If you can achieve a cleaner burn, your fuel efficiency dramatically increases. And yes, when tuning the car for this modification, the check engine lights have been coming on in some of the cars, according to some mechanics (from what i've heard). But that doesn't mean the fuel economy isn't improved. It is. The technology is there, it just needs perfecting like anything else. Do not dismiss something out of hand that you have not experienced that really does work. Especially one that can positively change the world as much as this one does.

It appears that these cars may be programmed to actually give you worse fuel economy at the factory. One source I personally spoke to formerly from the auto industry, said they witnessed collusion between the auto and oil companies. In return for Big Auto keeping fuel economy down (which saves Big Oil billions), the auto manufacturers got funding for their expensive redesigns (which drives all new sales--and kept them financially afloat), according to this source.

One interesting anecdote: I pulled out one of my "new car guides" from 1995. The new base model Honda civic was listed as getting 56 MPG EPA. Fast forward to my 2008 copy, and the 08 Civic gets 26 mpg city and 34 mpg hwy. Even their $26K hybrid only gets 40/46. Is technology in fuel economy so backward that in 13 years we can go from enormous "bag" 10 lb. cell phones to tiny phones that can take videos, surf the internet, email and catalogue our entire life--but our fuel economy actually gets WORSE as the price of the car DOUBLES! Could someone PLEASE explain this absurd technological inconsistency, and why millions of Americans are not howling to their government to force the auto industry to AT LEAST give us the fuel economy we enjoyed OVER A DECADE AGO??

Mercola
  
Fenderman
[ Joined on 01/07 ]  [ Posted on March 29, 2008]
-2 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

Be wary of any device that claims to improve fuel economy.  After all, if it worked why wouldn't the automotive manufacturers use it and radically boost their sales?

Mercola
  
john yelle
[ Joined on 02/08 ]  [ Posted on March 29, 2008]
2 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

I've been signed up on www. preignitionpc.com/pm when it first came out but haven't heard nor been able to get contacted by anyone there.  Makes me wonder what's really up?  I know there are alternatives but unless I can get more information, I just have to take governmental abuse in the form of higher gas prices with no end in sight.

Mercola
  
LadyPam
[ Joined on 02/08 ]  [ Posted on March 29, 2008]
       
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

Wait wait WAIT a minute here - you in the US are only paying $3.50 a gallon for gas??  In the UK, it costs MORE THAN DOUBLE that - actually closer to TRIPLE than double!

!

Mercola
  
ne_plus_ultra_1
[ Joined on 09/06 ]  [ Posted on March 30, 2008]
3 Points        
   
Apprentice User
  Mercola

Gee wiz, can't we all work together?

No?

At least you can read my MySpace blog and get smarter (or stupider) depending on the entry you read.

I just wrote 2000 characters to healthiswealth but can't locate them on this slightly disjointed thread.

One of my best friend's dad's pumped gas when he was a kid.  This guy came in regularly for gas and always had the oil checked.

Once he came in and there was nothing on the dipstick.  My friend's dad reported this to him and he said "I know" and indicated that he had created something new that didn't require crankcase oil.

Next week he showed up with a VERY expensive car with oil in the crankcase.

NOW, THIS IS AN ACTUAL PERSON THAT I CAN PUT YOU IN COMMUNICATION WITH.  PLEASE ONLY REBUT WITH THE SAME.

Mercola
  
Celtic dude
[ Joined on 03/08 ]  [ Posted on March 30, 2008]
-3 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

I am shocked that a so-called "professional engineer" has written such load of rubbish.

He says: "Hydrogen is a renewable, versatile, simple, sustainable domestic energy and there is no danger of running out of hydrogen because it is the most abundant element in the universe".

What nonsense! Hydrogen is NOT a form of renewable energy at all. In fact, hydrogen, by itself, does not exist in nature in any usable quantity. Do you know of any hydrogen wells or hydrogen mines? Of course not, because hydrogen has to be MANUFACTURED, for heaven's sake. It is MADE from other forms of energy such as electricity. And, as always with energy conversion, you get less energy from the hydrogen you manufacture than the electricity you put into the manufacturing process!

The concept of a carbon-free "hydrogen economy" is deceptive because it really    depends on NUCLEAR POWER ... to make the electricity...to make the hydrogen. That is actually OK by me, but remember that the the energy comes from the atomic power plant, from URANIUM fuel, and not from water.

As others have pointed out, hydrogen is just a way of STORING energy, like a battery. The energy itself comes from elsewhere.  

Here is a final illustration: If water is energy, as he says, then so is the carbon dioxide that is causing global warming in the first place. After all, it contains huge amounts of carbon, doesn't it? So why don't we burn that carbon and get free energy for ever? Oh that's right, I forgot, carbon dioxide is the RESIDUE that is left AFTER you burn carbon. Well, likewise, water is the RESIDUE left AFTER you "burn" hydrogen. Don't confuse it with a fuel.

Mercola
  
chazzone
[ Joined on 08/07 ]  [ Posted on March 30, 2008]
-2 Points        
   
This user is BELOW novice level and all their comments need to be reviewed with great caution.
  Mercola

This is totally bogus, and anyone who took a high school physiocs or chemistry class should know it.  There is currently no proven electrolysis system that produces hydrogen in an "over unity" condition,  That means that it takes more energy to get hydrogen than can be produced by burning the hydrogen that is produced.

This system will not only not increase your mileage, but will decrease mileage, because it will take more energy to run the alternator than you can get from the hydrogen that it might produce.  Notice that they want you to use their machine to tell you how much you're saving.  If you were getting 50% better mileage, you would need a machine to tell you so.

There is simply no other form of energy that we know of today to give the amount of energy, pound for pound, that petroleum does.  This will not likely change, and hydrogen will not be a real viable energy source until oil gets too expensive to pump out of the ground, but that wont be for hundreds of years, and by then we'll have fusion or zero point technology.

Mercola
  
Stefanek
[ Joined on 01/08 ]  [ Posted on March 31, 2008]
1 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

to Healthiswealth: www.preignitioncc.com/pm doesn't look like a trustworthy source.  I have a bad impression it's a SCAM.  What do you know about them besides they have a website? It's too good to be true and I didn't find anything else on the Internet.  Pls, fill me in.

Mercola
  
A Storm
[ Joined on 06/06 ]  [ Posted on April 2, 2008]
2 Points        
   
Novice User
  Mercola

healthiswealth,

We all totally believe in the collusion between the oil and auto companies, AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHY WE DON'T BELIEVE THAT WE WILL EVER SEE THESE THINGS COME TO FRUITION!!!

They have been talking about these energy saving vehicles and alternative energy sources since I was young and I have seen NOTHING in regard to that end ever become available to the masses.  Not even a slight increase in gas milage!!  There is too much $$$ involved.  

What would we do with all the unemployed oil tycoons??!!??  

  
  
goldgirl
[ Joined on 06/06 ] [ Posted on March 29, 2008 ]
24 Points