SEARCH:
Sign in | Join | Help
search Mercola.com
 
FREE Subscription 
The World’s Most Popular Natural Health Newsletter
School Bans Birthday Sweets

schools ban birthday sweetsIn an effort to combat the growing obesity problem, the school board of Neenah, Wisconsin, has banned children from bringing in sweets to share with others for birthdays and other special occasions.

Since 1980, childhood obesity rates in the U.S. have more than doubled, and adolescent obesity rates have tripled. Nationally, more than 17 percent of kids ages 6 through 19 are obese. Even more are overweight but not yet considered obese.

Studies have shown that those kids who buy lunch at school are more likely to be overweight. Neenah is hoping to promote a junk-food-free zone at school.


Sources:

Dr. Mercola''s Comments Dr. Mercola's Comments:

As regular readers of my newsletter know, I’m very concerned about the exploding problem of obesity. And I’m determined to help turn this deadly trend around. 

While I am certainly not a fan of governmental regulations, there is a proper place for government in protecting our safety. You certainly would not want your child’s school to allow alcohol or cigarettes in the lunchroom. So I believe it is a great step in the right direction to safeguard your children’s health by banning junk food.

Not only will sweets adversely affect their health, they will clearly negatively influence their ability to learn and isn’t that why they are in school in the first place?

The Obesity Epidemic is Claiming Younger and Younger Victims

Research calculations indicate that by mid-century, the growing risk of serious obesity-related illnesses like diabetes, heart disease and cancer, could lower the current average life expectancy of about 78 years by as much as five years. This statistic is a reversal of a trend that in 2002 promised a life span of 100 years by mid-century.

Even more concerning for parents: the unprecedented increase in childhood obesity may have already shortened children’s lives by anywhere from four to nine months.

Current obesity statistics are mind-blowing:

  • Two-thirds of America's adults are overweight or obese
  • As many as 30 percent of U.S. children are overweight
  • Childhood obesity has more than doubled within the past 25 years
  • Within the past 20 years, childhood diabetes has increased 10-fold

If this epidemic is not reversed we will, for the first time in history, see children living shorter lives than their parents. I am convinced that we will wake up long before that.

The Challenge of Making Good Choices

As I read through the Live Science article I thought, “How far should schools go in making decisions about what your children do and don’t eat?”

The article highlights a trend that is simultaneously good, and bad.

The good news is that in an effort to curb the epidemic of childhood obesity, some school systems are taking the bull by the horns when it comes to student access to poor food and drink choices. School boards like the one mentioned in the article are taking steps to eliminate the temptation of deadly sugary beverages (especially soda) and foods on campus.

The bad news? Simply removing temptation doesn’t help your children learn to make their own healthy choices.

As parents know, children learn most of their health habits at home. Moms and dads must lead by example and teach kids the importance of good nutrition, physical activity, and emotional health.

Facing the Truth: Is Your Child Obese?

Surprisingly, many parents don’t realize their child is overweight or obese. According to researchers, this is because we are so used to seeing overweight children that we don’t recognize the problem. And it’s not even a matter of denial, as one-third of mothers and over half of the fathers in a study thought their obese child was a normal weight.

Five Life-Changing Steps You Can Take to Help Your Overweight Child

  1. Replace sugary juices and soft drinks with pure water.

Children can easily cut down on the amount of sugar they eat by eliminating soda and juice and only drinking water. This step alone can have a dramatic effect on your child’s weight and health, since every soft drink or sugar-sweetened beverage consumed increases the risk of obesity by a whopping 60 percent.

  1. Learn your child’s Nutritional Type™ and plan meals accordingly.

It’s important for parents to encourage their children to eat healthy, nutritious foods, but this does not necessarily mean low-calorie diets or not allowing children to eat when they’re hungry. Children need calories and nutrients to grow and develop -- just make sure to encourage healthy foods geared for your child’s nutritional type, and bypass junk and processed foods.

A word about grains and sugars. Any meal or snack high in carbohydrates or sugars generates a rapid rise in your child’s blood glucose level. To adjust for this rise, the pancreas secretes the hormone insulin into the bloodstream, which lowers your child’s glucose (sugar) level. Insulin is essentially a storage hormone, which is used to store the excess calories from carbohydrates in the form of fat.

Insulin, stimulated by the excess carbohydrates in overabundant consumption of grains, starches and sweets, is responsible for your overweight child’s bulging tummy and fat rolls.

Even worse, high insulin levels suppress two other important hormones -- glucagons and growth hormones -- that are responsible for burning fat and sugar and promoting muscle development, respectively. So insulin from excess carbohydrates promotes fat, and then wards off the body's ability to lose that fat.

  1. Decrease or eliminate TV time and remove the TV from your child’s bedroom.

TV is a destructive influence on children. Not only does it encourage inactivity, but it also exposes them to commercials promoting worthless foods. Just as you don’t want your child exposed to ads for cigarettes during Saturday morning cartoons, neither should your kids be bombarded by non-stop commercials for sugary foods and snacks.

  1. Increase exercise.

Exercise is extremely important for all children. Your overweight or obese child needs at least 30 minutes of exercise a day, and major studies have shown that 60 minutes a day is best. Any activity that gets your child up and away from the television set, video game or computer is a good idea. Start out with a daily walk with your child, and then gradually increase the intensity to include activities such as jogging and using an elliptical machine.

  1. Help your child deal with emotional eating.

Emotions play a major role in childhood obesity and often, weight loss efforts get sabotaged by emotional eating. Your child may also have a hard time giving up junk food snacks. This is where the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) comes in. EFT can be profoundly helpful in alleviating not only food cravings, but also the underlying emotional challenges, such as low self-esteem, that can lead your child to eat unhealthy food or overeat. For more information on EFT, check out my free 25-page EFT manual.

More Tips for Creating a Healthy Eating Environment

Ultimately, teaching your child the importance of healthy foods and exercise -- not restricting their food intake or freedom of choice -- is the key to maintaining health. With that in mind, here are some tips to foster a healthy view of food and self-esteem in your child.

  • Refrain from making jokes about your child’s weight, even if no harm is intended
  • Explain the health risks of being overweight to your child, but avoid comparing your overweight child to other children, including thinner siblings
  • Cook healthy meals for your family, and let your child be involved in making dinner, but avoid making your child eat different food than the rest of the family
  • Encourage your child to make healthy food choices and praise them when they do instead of putting your child down about weight or eating habits
  • Instead of using food as a reward or punishment, have healthy snacks available at all times, and explain to your child the benefits they’ll get from eating these fresh, whole foods

 



Related Links:



Comment on This Article Community Comments (61)
 
 
Posted On Oct 15, 2008
I see nothing wrong with children having cake and ice cream for birthdays.  If kids ate healthful foods 80-85% of the time, then a once in a while treat would do absolutely no damage.
Moderation in everything.
This law is silly. 
Many laws are downright silly; I don't even agree with removing "Merry Christmas" from schools, and I am an atheist!

 
samurai
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 4/2007
samurai  
Replied

HeidiN
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2007
HeidiN  
 
Posted On Oct 16, 2008
Making a law is too extreme; but the amount of candy and cakes and soda given to my kids at school is obscene.  Schools do need to give this a serious look and put more healthful policies in place.


Nebraskamom7
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 11/2007
Nebraskamom7  
 
Posted On Oct 16, 2008
I also believe that the occasional "sweet treat" to celebrate birthdays are OK, but what drives me crazy is the candy that comes home in the backpacks for doing well on a test, for reading a certain amount of books, for winning some competition, for good behavior, etc.  Our Home and School Association gives the teachers a certain amount of money each semester to use as needed in their classroom and the amount spent on candy is terrible! (even if they do get it on sale or in bulk from Sam's Club)  Our hot lunch program is a joke as most of the food is pre-fab and just heated up and served.  The fruits and vegetables are mostly canned and much of it is government commodity food. It's interesting that the "birthday sweets" are under attack but it's okay to have soy based food (fake meat), gatorade and non-fruit fruit juices for the kids who can't or won't drink milk, Little Debbie snack products and pop available before and after school.  Instead of a junk free zone in schools, how about a healthy, whole food zone?  After all, isn't school supposed to be a place of "learning"? 


All Under Heaven
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 2/2008
All Under Heaven  
 
Posted On Oct 16, 2008
I agree. It's kind of disgusting of them to make these kind of stupid policies to deny the kids the simple joys.

Yes, the schools do need to cut back on the sweet treats and promote healthier eating, but every now and then a little won't hurt anyone.

I'm a strong believer that healthy eating starts at home.

And having been through school myself, the hot lunches are outright terrible food. In college it's an improvement they actually make it fresh.


mom2mattandtrev
Novice User Novice User Joined On 9/2008
mom2mattandtrev  
 
Posted On Oct 30, 2008

It's not a law, it's a District decision and if you saw the kids that I see day to day you would understand the need for it to happen.  We serve a fresh salad bar everyday (very seldom from cans) with beautiful fruits and vegetables.  The kids are making great choices when the options are there!  Every month each child in the school is introduced to a different fruit or vegetable through a great program we have.  It's amazing to see the positive changes that are happening.  I can honestly say that I am proud of the food I serve!



Rivkah_203
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2006
Rivkah_203  
 
Posted On Oct 30, 2008

Well said, Samurai!



Brazil123
Novice User Novice User Joined On 4/2008
Brazil123  
 
Posted On Oct 30, 2008

I am glad this school has prohibited the junk food. Junk food is an epidemic. In my kids school the teacher gives candy to the children all the time as treats. My kid has allergies therefore I send in a gluten free box of cookies. So far this year I have send in 4 boxes. This is appaling!!! If I do not send in the organic cookies, my son will get candy laced with melamine high fructose corn syrup importated from China. Cookies are not good regardless of whethter they are organic or not but I feel obligated to send the cookies so my son will not eat the poisenous stuff that will certainly kill him over the short run.



Julieanne
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2007
Julieanne  
 
Posted On Oct 31, 2008

samurai, the trouble is, if you have 30 or 40 children in a class, these treats become more than'once in a while'. On top of the class treats, there are also birthday parties (at home) and on it goes. I'm so glad I don't have young children any more - we didn't have to cope with all this!



kgleeson
Novice User Novice User Joined On 6/2006
kgleeson  
 
Posted On Oct 31, 2008

I am with you completely!


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 17, 2008
I eventually skimmed through some of the comments on public schools as child abuse and it sickens me.

I taught in a Chicago suburban school of 3800 (Proviso West, Dr. Mercola); a Black inner city school in Milwaukee; a blue-collar, zero-aspirations school in Mexico, Maine; and a self-contained school within a private teen mental health agency, where I had sole responsibility for the school and its state-required curriculum. In every single case, I had students on fire and eager to learn, and learn they did. My four children went to those so-called government schools in central Maine (where I substituted when I was a full-time farmer) and I served on the school board for that large district for 10 years. My kids were well educated within that system, and were afforded opportunities they might not have found elsewhere; they certainly had experiences far richer than any I could have provided at home.

Parents who wish to home-school have my respect. My point is that some public schools truly excel, and what is wrong with pubic education in America has a great deal to do with the contempt in which many of us hold intellectual achievement. "Elitist" has become a dirty word here.

Jonny, you love to attack and tear down, and I agree that in the generic sense our "government" is deeply flawed; but what do you propose? Anarchy? What you tear down you must rebuild. Next time you feel the urge to complain, kindly come up with what is called a viable alternative, k?

 
Islander
Moderator User Moderator User, Joined On 3/2007
Islander  
Replied

Swami Barmi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 10/2006
Swami Barmi  
 
Posted On Oct 18, 2008
Islander: you have an admirable and enviable background. You also have a level of intimacy with "the system" that the rest of us posting here clearly don't. With this post you've done what I've done elsewhere: you've attempted to engage No_Name in meaningful discussion to resolve a disagreement. Your post deserves at least a positive acknowledgment of your experiences, your dedication, and the simple respect of giving you the benefit of the doubt that you arrived at well meditated decisions. And I might add, acknowledging that you are not guilty of abusing your children.

Instead what you get is an unsubstantiated
claim: that he's provided "many viable alternatives", as
though he is the sole arbiter of what is an acceptable path to choose

or that he's even provided “many” alternatives. He's long on claims and insults and short on substance. His
posts offer a bipolar world where education is either homeschooling
OR child abuse, politics is either libertarianism OR fascism, and
other such absolutist dichotomies. Since candor isn't his strong
suit, one is left reading between what few lines he offers. As an
example, he says his kids are homeschooled, yet he tells us that he,
his wife, and friends “play roles” in teaching them, as opposed
to actually telling us what this homeshooled arrangement is. It
sounds like he's got an arrangement that allows himself and his wife
to work while at the same time having his kids "homeschooled". Rather

than recognize his good fortune, he criticizes others for not having
it as well, if they would even find it desirable to begin with.



Swami Barmi
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 10/2006
Swami Barmi  
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2008
"I see the ad hominem attacks have come out yet again from Swami."

My posts pay very particular attention to the things that you say and I address them all. In fact, as far as this goes I pay much more respect to you than you care to acknowledge, because despite the fact that I may disagree with you, I at least will read what you write and address what you write.

I've tried repeatedly to engage you in detailed discussions, but the more detailed I get the more you resort to posts like the above. Even the post that you're ostensibly responding to invites more information from you, but you choose not to respond with anything addressing my points. An ad hominem attack attacks the person's character and does NOT discuss the issues at hand. I am not guilty of this, as everyone else who reads these threads can see, though it does describe you to a tee.


Aaltrude
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 4/2007
Aaltrude  
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2008
"My posts pay very particular attention to the things that you say and I
address them all. In fact, as far as this goes I pay much more respect
to you than you care to acknowledge, because despite the fact that I
may disagree with you, I at least will read what you write and address
what you write".

Well written Swami. I'm glad someone who is more articulate than I am is prepared to put this into words. I have often felt that No Name and another alias who writes in a very similar manner (could they be the same person?) are killing a lot of the discussion on V V. I know that I avoid getting involved in any discussion with these alias's and although I am replying to your post, I will not do so to any posts in this thread or any other to either of these persona's. How many other V V contributor's are feeling the same way? I have noticed that the number of posts and discussions on V V has markedly declined lately .


Reesacat
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 1/2007
Reesacat  
 
Posted On Oct 19, 2008
Aaltrude writes:
 "I know that I avoid getting involved in any discussion with these alias's and although I am replying to your post, I will not do so to any posts in this thread or any other to either of these persona's. How many other V V contributor's are feeling the same way? I have noticed that the number of posts and discussions on V V has markedly declined lately ."

Well said-I feel the same way. 


aziegler_203
Novice User Novice User Joined On 8/2007
aziegler_203  
 
Posted On Nov 02, 2008

Great point about the problem with public education being that intellect is looked down upon in the US, Islander. I totally agree. There's lots wrong with our schools and unless people start thinking outside of the same old box we aren't going to get anywhere fast.

On the topic- I see nothing wrong with birthday treats- it's the school lunches that have to re-vamp to serve REAL food and not fake stuff. They also have milk as the only drink and we all know that low-fat, pasturized and homogonized milk is not healthy.


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 17, 2008
This is not a "law". This is a local school board making a local policy. This is perfectly within the confines and design of constitutional law; a school board should have the autonomy to make whatever rule they see fit without federal or state interference, never mind the interference of public busy-bodies transforming a benign local decision into a national scandal via the internet.

There's little doubt that there are many school boards, public and private, that have similar rules. And I daresay there are many "home schools" that have the same rules as well.

As for the idea that this is a "kill joy" policy: there are many joys in these kids' lives. They have plenty of opportunity to celebrate their birthdays at home and with friends and relatives. Taking the time out to celebrate the birthdays of 20 - 30 kids each year, plus whatever holiday celebrations they may have, is a waste of time anyway. During my time in school in the 1960s - 70s, not only did we walk five miles through tundra, but we never had birthday celebrations either, and I've escaped relatively unscathed.

 
Swami Barmi
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 10/2006
Swami Barmi  
Replied

Islander
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 3/2007
Islander  
 
Posted On Oct 17, 2008
Swami, your point is well taken. The unfortunate choice of the emotionally charged word "banned" in the intro seemed to set a lot of people off.

I raised my children without candy or desserts, except on special occasions.  Yes, they had cake and ice cream on their birthday, and they certainly did not need to have it again in school - which, like you, they did not.  Bad enough they got a sweet dessert with hot lunch. It offends me when well-meaning people interfere with my children's nutrition.

Buying or baking treats for 25-28 kids may present a hardship for a lot of mothers. And that number of kids in a class means a sweet celebration about once every two weeks. Too much sugar, especially for those who are already hyper.

Sorry if I'm repeating some of the earlier comments. I don't have the patience to sort out a string of a dozen or more jumbled replies. I wish someone would explain to me why the software can't sort them chronologically!


stoic
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 3/2007
stoic  
 
Posted On Oct 17, 2008
I wish someone would explain to me why the software can't sort them chronologically!

...
the programmers live on Jolt cola & the stuff in "some peoples'" closets.....


bmc
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 2/2007
bmc  
 
Posted On Oct 18, 2008
Thank you Swami and islander.
My son gets plenty of joy in his life, and doesn't need extra sweets and processed junk in order to have joy. In any case, there are a large number occasions like birthdays where he gets the opportunity to have some treats.  Also, I don't want to have to worry about what's being offered to my son at school that I have no control over.
 
As for home schooling, my husband & I are, and have seriously considered it. One reason my son is in school for now, is because he is extremely social and loves being in class with the other children.


LucyL
Novice User Novice User Joined On 12/2006
LucyL  
 
Posted On Oct 30, 2008

SwamiBarmi wrote: <i>"This is perfectly within the confines and design of constitutional law; a school board should have the autonomy to make whatever rule they see fit without federal or state interference, never mind the interference of public busy-bodies transforming a benign local decision into a national scandal via the internet."</i>

There is one flaw in this logic - children are forced to go to schools.  Certainly any truly private organization can have these rules, but when a citizen is compelled, not as the result of any criminal activity, to attend events, it only compounds the problem to deny basic rights in food or clothing choices.



Islander
Moderator User Moderator User Joined On 3/2007
Islander  
 
Posted On Oct 30, 2008

Lucy, nice try on the html. As you can see, the board won't take it. You can use it in the Vital Votes section, though.

Anyway...I fail to follow your logic. Swami mentioned local control, of which this is an example, and which all parents profess to want. The function of school boards and committees is to set policy for their district. You elect the members of this board. As a parent you can attend their meetings and voice your opinion. If you have issues with the way they do things, run for that office yourself.

Yes, we require that children be educated; we do not force them to attend school. Nor do we value what is free. In some parts of the world, families make financial sacrifices to send their children to be educated; many cannot afford what is for them a luxury. No, our system is not perfect, but at least here every child has the OPPORTUNITY to become educated...an opportunity we take for granted.


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 30, 2008

I work for the school district as a Food Service Assistant.  I see EVERYDAY children eating what is most likely their most nutritional meal of the day.  Our district is very concerned with the obesity problem in America.  There have been many changes the last few years that at first I wasn't quite happy about because as a parent I too, felt that our kids need to be able to induldge from time to time. That being said, what I didn't realize right away was that school is not the place for that!  Schools are for education!  The education shouldn't stop in the classroom.  We have an obligation to these children that do not get properly educated about food (whether it be from cultural, ethnic or financial means) and we are doing a very good job.  We do not sell or even allow sodas, outside sweets (cakes, cupcakes or cakes, candy) into our schools,  There is no need.  We do not deny them sweets either!  We do (in the kitchen) make cakes, brownies and cookies for the children as a treat once in a while.  The difference is that these treats are lower in saturated fats, calories and made from wheat.  

So, I say, "Good Job" to the schools that are trying to help our kids eat and stay healthier.  If parents would take the time to educate themselves and their children about nutrition then this wouldn't be such an issue.  But since parents are always on the go and looking for the quick fixes (not always the healthier ones) it is important that the schools step in and do their part and educate.

*Part of the reason for not allowing outside food in is also because of the food allergies that are on the rise.  Of course, there is the reason of fear of contamination and lack of sanitary conditions with food prep.*


 
mom2mattandtrev
Novice User Novice User, Joined On 9/2008
mom2mattandtrev  
Replied

Reesacat
Savvy User Savvy User Joined On 1/2007
Reesacat  
 
Posted On Oct 30, 2008

Your comment about food allergies makes a lot of sense-one dear friend of mine has a daughter who is deathly allergic to peanuts and just a trace on a plate or the smell sends her to the ER.

Thank you for your service to the children:)



Hathorhetep
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2006
Hathorhetep  
 
Posted On Oct 30, 2008

I sent home baked cupcakes or cookies to my son's school.  I used apple sauce instead of oil, fresh ingredients, etc.   If frosted, never a can of that creepy Franken Nonfood!  That stuff is scarier than uranium!

Fresh ingredients only to make frosting, or cookies, etc.  All things in moderation.  I'll take an extra helping of oxygen, please.



Nebraskamom7
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 11/2007
Nebraskamom7  
 
Posted On Oct 31, 2008

mom2mattandtrev,

I am very interested in knowing how your school has been able to set up a lunch program with a fresh salad bar (fruits and vegetables) and healthier foods being produced in the school kitchen.  What is the program that you have that allows you to introduce a different fruit/vegetable every month?  Can you give a contact name/number or is this something that someone at your school set up?  I would love to be able to enact some change at our school with regards to the meals.  We are a smaller parochial high school and they provide the two parochial grade schools in the county with the daily hot meals.  The one grade school is 1 block from the high school, so those kids just walk to the high school cafeteria for their hot lunch. Our grade school is 8 miles from the high school, so the food has to travel.

We, personally, have been trying to "influence" some of the students into eating healthier foods.  My daughter has been in FCS (Family and Consumer Science-which is Home Ec) and takes squash, pumpkins, tomatoes, peppers, zucchini,and peaches, etc, to the class to prepare and eat.  I sent articles on the hidden dangers of microwaving food for the teacher to read and discuss.  One girl would only try a new fruit or vegetable if it was "good for her hair and skin"!  My daughter would always tell her "Of course it's good for your hair and skin.  It's homegrown, garden fresh fruits and vegetables.  Have I ever brought anything to class that wasn't?"

Now, if we could just get that to carry over to our school lunch program!

Just as a side note, this article was not about the goodness, badness,politics or anything else about public schools.  It was about a school board in Wisconsin that chose to "ban" sharing sweets from home to celebrate birthdays and other occasions as their effort to address the concern over the rising rates of obesity.  This was a local "mandate" and I hope a large number of people/school families were involved in the discussion.  


 
 
 
Posted On Oct 16, 2008
I live in California and the schools here in my area did away with this quite some time ago. I didn't even know until I sent cupcakes with my 2nd grade son on his B'day to share with every one. He's now 18. The cupcakes were sent back home with him and I was told later on by his teacher that possible unsanitary baking conditions had forced the school  to stop taking any home made foods in classrooms and bake sales. If they did let anything come in, it had to be store bought.

It's good that the sweets concern is finally really hitting the schools, but how long did it take them?

 
WellnessMom
Savvy User Savvy User, Joined On 6/2006
WellnessMom  
Replied

LoriSmi
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 1/2008
LoriSmi  
 
Posted On Oct 31, 2008

Unsanitary baking conditions????? Had the school been in any of these homes???

Did any of us get sick from eating foods baked in other people's homes? Even those whose moms didn't clean real well?

Were there cockroaches baked into the treats? Dog hairs? Vomit?

I am truly disgusted by this kind of logic. It automatically assumes people are dirty and unsanitary.

Many people working in licensed stores who sell baked goods do not practice sanitary habits. So this is all nonsense.

I have 5 kids who work in some way with the food industry and I can tell you horror stories of what my kids have heard and witnessed (and sometimes turned in!). Spit in people's food, food dropped on floor and picked up, money handled and then food without washing of hands (I witness this all the time!), and so on. Is this more sanitary than someone's home?

I am also sure that store-bought foods are NOT safer nutritionally than what is often baked in the home! I find this a scary trend!

For at least 10 thousand years man has eaten in what is now considered unsanitary conditions and he has not only survived, but has been stronger for it! Many culures around the world stomp on their food with bare feet, prepare foods outside or in dirt floored huts, and some even eat uncooked meats and other "unsafe" foods.

I sometimes feel like the USA has turned into the Twilight Zone! we have allowed common sense to go out the window and allowed bureacrats to control every aspect of our lives. It is disgusting.

I trust foods made in most any home over many of the things I have seen happen in restaurants! I have worked in restaurants and have seen waitstaff eat foods off of people's plates (scallops), not wash their hands after handling money then doing food prep, touch their hair and then food, blow their nose then touch food and other surfaces, and other disgusting things. And this is considered more sanitary than a mom making food with love?????

I am truly amazed and disheartened. Ridiculous



Keikukaren
Novice User Novice User Joined On 10/2007
Keikukaren  
 
Posted On Oct 31, 2008

I live in Wisconsin and our schools, like yours, do not allow homemade snacks/treats to be shared in the classroom.  They said it was because of allergies and not knowing how foods were prepared. Most kids brought in mass produced baked treats, but I refused to go that route.  I sent my kids with a couple 3 pound bags of organic apples.  Quick and easy and healthy.



Julieanne
Apprentice User Apprentice User Joined On 6/2007
Julieanne  
 
Posted On Nov 03, 2008

Lori, I agree with you wholeheartedly.  But this is probably all to do with litigation - if anyone got sick they could blame it on the 'home baked' food.

We now have laws in Australia that insist all chutneys, jams etc sold at church, school or charity fund-raising events have to be in new jars - no more recycled jars. This has put a lot of people off, as jars are expensive and can only be bought in quantity.

It's a crazy world we are living in!


 
 
 
 
© Copyright 2009 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. If you want to use this article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
* These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your physician before using this product.